· Private foundation
Word & Deed Foundation of IMMI Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k108 grants · $268k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $422k
- $250k+1 grant · $466k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CRU | $465,600 |
| GENESIS CHURCH | $180,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $128,000 |
| ANCHORS AWAY MINISTRIES | $114,000 |
| Josiah Venture | $16,300 |
| ACT | $11,200 |
| Global Service Network | $9,000 |
| YOUTH FOR CHRIST | $8,400 |
| THRU THE BIBLE RADIO | $8,400 |
| MISSION TO UKRAINE | $8,000 |
| BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION | $8,000 |
| LUIS PALAU EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION | $6,800 |
| NEHEMIAH VISION MINISTRIES | $6,560 |
| One Mission Society | $6,200 |
| CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $204k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
147 repeat relationships — 105 still active in FY2024, 42 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSE6× · 2019–2024 · $829k · revenue +151%
- JVJosiah Venture6× · 2019–2024 · $352k · revenue +46%
- MTMISSION TO UKRAINE INC6× · 2019–2024 · $236k · revenue +175%
Funded once
- NCNORTHVIEW CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $50k
- CACross America Incone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -74%
- YFYOUTH FOR CHRISTone grant, 2022 · $21k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.
Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Our mission is proclaiming the message of salvation through the saving power of the Holy Spirit to reach the unreached by evangelizing; motivating, mobilizing and organizing the body of Christ.
Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…
Spread the gospel of jesus christ
To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.
The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Eurasia and the most unlike its peers is Luis Palau Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
93 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 93 of the 188 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds Josiah Venture ↗
- Who funds MISSION TO UKRAINE INC ↗
- Who funds Youth For Christ Inc ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Luis Palau Association ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds WORLD SPORTS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW SONG MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
- Who funds DADCAMP INC ↗
- Who funds NEHEMIAH VISION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds INDIA RURAL EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds THE O'CONNOR HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Mephibosheth Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds Third Phase Christian Center ↗
- Who funds HEART OF AFRICIA INC ↗
- Who funds GRIT INTO GRACE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds MISSION EURASIA ↗
- Who funds LAST BELL MINISTRIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: 633 Immi Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Tyndale House Ministries · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · The Bolick Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Gordon Christian Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Word & Deed Foundation of IMMI Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.