Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

For His Glory Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$261kInternational$54kHuman Services$52kSocial Science$24kFood & Nutrition$21kHealth$19kEducation$15kCivil Rights$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HELP THE PERSECUTED$1,500
THOMAS MORE SOCIETY$1,000
NORTH SALEM CHRISTIAN CHURCH$1,000
SIM$732
CHRISTIAN LEADERS FOR AFRICA$600
MIDWEST FOOD BANK$500
LOVING SHEPHERD MINISTRIES$500
MISSION TO UKRAINE$500
Individual grant recipient$500
HANDS OF HOPE$500
INDIANA RIGHT TO LIFE$400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $500 → 14%MWANA VILLAGES: $10k → 16%GATEWAY WOODS: $2k → 12%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $10k → 15%MWANA VILLAGES: $5k → 16%GATEWAY WOODS: $1k → 12%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $5k → 15%MWANA VILLAGES: $5k → 16%GATEWAY WOODS: $1k → 12%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $760 → 15%GATEWAY WOODS: $1k → 12%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $714 → 15%GATEWAY WOODS: $1k → 12%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $510 → 15%MWANA VILLAGES: $500 → 16%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $900 → 16%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $500 → 16%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $400 → 16%HEART CHANGE MINISTRIES: $25k → 16%WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES: $2k → 16%WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
IN
PA
CO
MO
VA
TN
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$461k · 41 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +93% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
17

Total granted

$461k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
+46%

Still filing today

41%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionEducationHealthInternationalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    WALK THRU THE BIBLE MINISTRIES INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $30k · revenue +61%
  • MV
    MWANA VILLAGES US INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $21k · revenue +132%
  • MF
    MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +249%

Funded once

  • HC
    HEART CHANGE MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -24%
  • SI
    SAGAMORE INSTITUTE (ELEVATE)
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • C
    CRU
    one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Passionlife Ministries Inc

Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.

Religion
3
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
4
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
5
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
6
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
7
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

8
Life Network

Life Network provides support and mentoring to women and men facing unexpected pregnancies; offers parenting support, material resources, and referrals; and promotes sexual risk avoidance through education to foster a culture that values…

Health
9
A Choice for Life Inc

Bsideu for life is committed to presenting the gospel of our lord in word and deed by educating women facing crisis pregnancies, responding to their needs and protecting the lives of unborn children.bsideu for life also equips mothers and…

10
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
11
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
12
Crossroads Christian Counseling

Crossroads combines innovative clinical counseling with a redemptive worldview to restore people to emotional health, relational unity, and a hopeful future.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Evangelism Fellowship Inc and the most unlike its peers is Christian Foundation of Indiana Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPregnancy Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Homeless Services & ShelterCancer Support OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%7%<5yr13%7%5–10yr18%17%10–20yr14%23%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr23%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%8%<5yr13%5%5–10yr18%12%10–20yr14%19%20–35yr13%52%35–55yr23%5%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
10%
4,324/41,960

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
21/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COLLEGE PARK CHURCH INC — $96,315 · OtherCOLLEGE PARK CHURCH INCCOMMUNITY BIBLE FELLOWSHIP — $19,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY BIBLE FELLOWSHIPCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST — $18,500 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRISTSAGAMORE INSTITUTE (ELEVATE)(PURPOSEFUL DESIGN) — $18,000 · OtherSAGAMORE INSTITUTE (ELEVATE)(PURPOSEFUL DESIGN)WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC — $14,200 · OtherHELP THE PERSECUTED INC — $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $12,500 · OtherTEAM — $12,000 · Other+34 more — $126,432 · Other+34 moreHEART CHANGE MINISTRIES INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesHEART CHANGE MIN…MWANA VILLAGES US INC — $20,500 · Human ServicesMWANA VILLAGES U…MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP — $18,784 · Human ServicesMIDWEST FOOD BAN…APOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesAPOSTOLIC CHRIST…WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $2,700 · Human Services+2 more — $2,500 · Human ServicesWALK THRU THE BIBLE MINISTRIES INC — $30,000 · ReligionSAUL TO PAUL MINISTRIES — $7,500 · Religion+2 more — $1,600 · ReligionMISSION TO UKRAINE INC — $11,500 · Education40 DAYS FOR LIFE — $8,500 · EducationCREATING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS INC — $4,500 · EducationThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago — $1,000 · EducationLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC — $16,000 · InternationalHOPE INTERNATIONAL — $1,000 · InternationalLIFE CENTERS INC — $16,000 · Health+1 more — $100 · HealthTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY — $9,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$330,947Human Services$75,484Religion$39,100Education$25,500International$17,000Health$16,100Crime & Legal$9,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWALK THRU THE BIBLE MINISTRIES INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHEART CHANGE MINISTRIES INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMWANA VILLAGES US INC — $20,500 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP — $18,784 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE CENTERS INC — $16,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC — $16,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION TO UKRAINE INC — $11,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCROSSROADS BIBLE COLLEGE INC — $11,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY — $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budget40 DAYS FOR LIFE — $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAUL TO PAUL MINISTRIES — $7,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAPOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN FOUNDATION OF INDIANA INC — $6,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetDayspring Center Inc — $5,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCREATING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS INC — $4,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSusan B Anthony List Education Fund — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA FAMILY INSTITUTE INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $2,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUTH78 — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN LEADERS FOR AFRICA INC — $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA RIGHT TO LIFE INCORPORATED — $400 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WALK THRU THE BIBLE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds HEART CHANGE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds MWANA VILLAGES US INC
  • Who funds MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP
  • Who funds LIFE CENTERS INC
  • Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC
  • Who funds MISSION TO UKRAINE INC
  • Who funds CROSSROADS BIBLE COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds THOMAS MORE SOCIETY
  • Who funds 40 DAYS FOR LIFE
  • Who funds SAUL TO PAUL MINISTRIES
  • Who funds APOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME INC
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION OF INDIANA INC
  • Who funds Dayspring Center Inc
  • Who funds CREATING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS INC
  • Who funds Susan B Anthony List Education Fund
  • Who funds INDIANA FAMILY INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · The Palmer Family Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · 633 Immi Foundation Inc · Word & Deed Foundation of IMMI Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization For His Glory Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to For His Glory Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to For His Glory Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph