· Public charity
American College of Preventive Medicine
Advances the science and practice of disease prevention and health promotion.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $171k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $329k
- $250k+1 grant · $261k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Emory University (DPP) | $260,722 |
| National Board for Health & Wellness Coach | $169,464 |
| Pivot X Coach Traning Ltd | $94,675 |
| Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia | $64,940 |
| American Medical Association | $49,561 |
| Lincoln Community Health Center | $30,000 |
| Association of Black Cardiologists | $25,000 |
| Black Women's Health Imperative | $21,756 |
| Capstone Health Services Foundation | $12,000 |
| Henry Ford Health System | $12,000 |
| Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists | $11,107 |
| Los Angeles Lgbt Center | $10,000 |
| Nevada Public Health Institute | $8,900 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $104k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AMAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION4× · 2021–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +11%
- NBNATIONAL BOARD FOR HEALTH & WELLNESS COACHING INC4× · 2021–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +27% · 33% of their budget
- EUEmory University3× · 2022–2024 · $804k · revenue +15%
Funded once
- CHCommunity Health Cooperativeone grant, 2021 · $37k
- TITelligen Incone grant, 2023 · $9k
- TUTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Educationone grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enhance the health status of those we serve in partnership with medical staff and other community organizations by providing wellness services, health education, training, and access to safe high quality health care services.
The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.
Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.
Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.
The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.
Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.
North shore health system medical faculty group practice (the corporation) functions as an extension of the northwell health hospitals by bringing medical care to community settings, providing care to medicare, medicaid, and other…
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.
Helping everyone live a longer, happier, and healthier life.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Board for Health & Wellness Coaching Inc and the most unlike its peers is The J Moss Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BOARD FOR HEALTH & WELLNESS COACHING INC ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BLACK WOMENS HEALTH PROJECT dba BLACK WOMENS HEALTH IMPERATIVE ↗
- Who funds NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds GRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER ↗
- Who funds ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds CAPSTONE HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION PC ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF BLACK CARDIOLOGISTS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds The J Moss Foundation ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF DIABETES CARE & EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAGNOLIA MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROVENTION HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN NV INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Reach Out and Read Inc · American Heart Association Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · Direct Relief · California Healthcare Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Tides Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American College of Preventive Medicine funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Boston Community Pediatrics Inc — 10% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.