· Private foundation
Quest Diagnostics Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $48k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $1.0M
- $250k+9 grants · $7.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHOOSE HEALTHY LIFE | $2,800,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $1,400,000 |
| MARCH OF DIMES | $929,128 |
| HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH | $504,408 |
| BALTIMORE CONNECT INC | $490,980 |
| GREEN BRONX MACHINE | $422,487 |
| ST JOSEPHS HOSPITAL & MED CTR FNDTN INC | $421,116 |
| THE Y IN CENTRAL MARYLAND | $289,198 |
| CHASE BREXTON HEALTH SERVICES INC | $274,584 |
| RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER | $229,868 |
| HEALTH COALITION OF PASSAIC | $222,183 |
| COMMUNITY E CONSULT NETWORK INC | $203,779 |
| RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NJ | $100,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS | $100,000 |
| BLACK GIRL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC | $72,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $5.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 14% of Quest Diagnostics Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 4% of the giving stays in NJ; read by stated purpose it is 11% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UWUNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITY4× · 2020–2023 · $7.4M · revenue +42%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $6.1M · revenue +33%
- CHCHOOSE HEALTHY LIFE2× · 2023–2024 · $5.7M · revenue +25% · 29% of their budget
Funded once
- CCOSSMAone grant, 2023 · $823k
- SISalud Integral de la Montana Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $750k · revenue +41%
- PCPRIMARY CARE OF SOUTHWEST GEORGIA INCone grant, 2021 · $366k · revenue +10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.
University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…
Bmhc is a no wrong-door safety net program for men of color. our patients receive a head-to-toe assessment to address all possible concerns which will inform our health care professionals of the current state of your health. any validated…
As a charitable organization, our mission is to enhance the health of the people we serve. lhdcmc's vision is "living healthier together", providing a broad range of inpatient and outpatient services, a number of specialty and subspecialty…
Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…
Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)
To support its member healthcare organizations further innovation and excellence in patient care, teaching, and research.
To increase the number of healthy families in our community by providing high quality, comprehensive health services.
We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.
Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chase Brexton Health Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 18% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds CHOOSE HEALTHY LIFE ↗
- Who funds BREAD OF LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ECONSULT NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds CHASE BREXTON HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE CONNECT INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL AND HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Salud Integral de la Montana Inc ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc ↗
- Who funds GREEN BRONX MACHINE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH COALITION OF PASSAIC COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds PRIMARY CARE OF SOUTHWEST GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds BGH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds EXPERIENCE CAMPS ↗
- Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
- Who funds Healthy NewsWorks ↗
- Who funds LONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE ↗
- Who funds BLUFORD HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds National Black College Alumni Hall of Fame ↗
- Who funds Family Christian Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds THE O'CONNELL HOUSE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Direct Relief · American Heart Association Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Quest Diagnostics Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc — 22% of income from government
- Chase Brexton Health Services Inc — 4% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.