· Public charity
Physician Associate Foundation of the American Academy of Physician Associates
The mission of the physician associate foundation (paf) is to empower pas to improve health through philanthropy and service.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 40% of PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATE FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $38,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $202,375 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $164,375 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT NSF | $11,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT SERVICE LEARNING | $10,000 |
| HILLSIDE HEALTH CARE | $9,000 |
| NEW YORK STATE SOCIETY OF PAS | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 9% of Physician Associate Foundation of the American Academy of Physician Associates’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CECOMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT NFP3× · 2019–2025 · $26k · revenue +47%
- TUTOURO UNIVERSITY2× · 2018–2021 · $25k · revenue +26%
- OVOVI & VIOLET INTERNATIONAL INC2× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- JMJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT STUDENT SOCIETYone grant, 2024 · $10k
- MIMAYANZA INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +31%
- TGTHE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HEALING CLINICone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…
Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.
The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…
We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.
The mission of the family health centers at nyu langone is to improve the overall health of the communities it serves by delivering high quality, culturally-competent primary car, and related services within community-based settings.
Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.
University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.
University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…
Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Empowerment Nfp and the most unlike its peers is Proyecto Florecer Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT NFP ↗
- Who funds TOURO UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds OVI & VIOLET INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds COLORECTAL TEAM OVERSEAS ↗
- Who funds WAGNER COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
- Who funds MAYANZA INC ↗
- Who funds Rhode Island Hospital ↗
- Who funds FREE CLINIC OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD STRONG ↗
- Who funds SALUS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST MEDICAL GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE COUNTY FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds TRINITY FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS INC ↗
- Who funds KENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TOMAGWA MINISTRIES INC DBA TOMAGWA HEALTHCARE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Social Medicine International ↗
- Who funds REDWOOD COAST MEDICAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds CLINICA ESPERANZA HOPE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS FOR ANDEAN COMMUNITY HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds HILLSIDE HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds HEALTH HORIZONS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK STATE SOCIETY OF PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL HEALTH EDUCATORS INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION ENDEAVOR INC ↗
- Who funds PROYECTO FLORECER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Bay Path University ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Direct Relief · National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Physician Associate Foundation of the American Academy of Physician Associates funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bay Path University — 3% of income from government
- Northeast Medical Group Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Physician Associate Foundation of the American Academy of Physician Associates?
Find your warmest path to Physician Associate Foundation of the American Academy of Physician Associates through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.