· Private foundation
The Hilaria and Alec Baldwin Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of THE HILARIA AND ALEC BALDWIN FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k19 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $120k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| USTA FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY | $20,000 |
| NEW YORK PHILHARMONIC | $20,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF BROOKLYN | $15,000 |
| THE ACTORS STUDIO | $15,000 |
| HAMPTONS INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| RADIATION & PUBLIC HEALTH PROJECT | $10,000 |
| THE BALDWIN FUND | $7,200 |
| MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC | $5,000 |
| NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO | $5,000 |
| TRIBECA FILM FESTIVAL NYC LLC | $5,000 |
| JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER | $5,000 |
| AMAGANSETT LS & CG STATION SOCIETY | $3,500 |
| EAST HAMPTON LIBRARY | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TPTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $225k · revenue +5%
- THTHE HAMPTONS INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INC5× · 2020–2024 · $98k · revenue +65%
- ISINTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF BROOKLYN5× · 2020–2024 · $95k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- PFPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAYone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -34%
- NYNew York Universitygraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +30%
- NONYU OFFICE OF GIFT ADMINISTRATIONone grant, 2020 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…
The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…
The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.
A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.
Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…
Mtc's work includes producing and developing new work on and off-broadway, nurturing artists throughout their careers, and positively impacting the lives of many through innovative education programs. we are committed to equity, diversity…
Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Playwrights Horizons Inc and the most unlike its peers is Amagansett Horse Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
110 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 110 of the 163 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC ↗
- Who funds THE HAMPTONS INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF BROOKLYN ↗
- Who funds GUILD HALL OF EAST HAMPTON INC ↗
- Who funds USTA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds ROBERT F KENNEDY CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
- Who funds ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds AMAGANSETT HORSE RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ACTORS' STUDIO INC ↗
- Who funds JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC ↗
- Who funds PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AMBER WAVES FARM INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
- Who funds THE PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds FDNY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EAST HAMPTON LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds AMAGANSETT VILLAGE IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds Housing Opportunities for Musicians and Entertainers ↗
- Who funds GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · The Jct Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Woodward Family Charitable Foundation · Andrew Sabin Family Foundation · The Maryam and Hervey Seley Foundation · The Reba Judith Sandler Foundation Inc · J & Ar Foundation · Kazickas Family Foundation · Muchnic Foundation · The Donald and Barbara Zucker Family Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hilaria and Alec Baldwin Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- LOVE146 Inc — 49% of income from government
- Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc — 3% of income from government
- Sacred Heart University Incorporated — 1% of income from government
- Two River Theatre Company Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Hilaria and Alec Baldwin Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Hilaria and Alec Baldwin Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.