· Private foundation
Ruggles Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k36 grants · $127k
- $10k–50k44 grants · $833k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+1 grant · $400k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE | $400,000 |
| RUDY RUGGLES JR FAMILY FUND - BESSEMER GIVING FUND | $200,000 |
| J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE | $200,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100,000 |
| THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL | $75,000 |
| ACT A CONTEMPORARY THEATRE OF CT | $75,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND | $75,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL | $60,000 |
| AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY | $50,000 |
| SIGMA XI THE SCIENTIFIC | $50,000 |
| TROUT UNLIMITED | $50,000 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER | $50,000 |
| SCARBOROUGH LAND TRUST | $50,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $45,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
126 repeat relationships — 84 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $374k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC8× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +111%- TPThe Pierpont Morgan Library7× · 2017–2025 · $239k · revenue +109%
- OFORGANIZATION FOR TROPICAL STUDIES INC4× · 2017–2024 · $215k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- DHDANBURY HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $140k
- FOFOUNDATIONS OF NUVANCE HEALTHone grant, 2022 · $90k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Education and Research
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Side Center for Community Life and the most unlike its peers is The 5 Gyres Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 175 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC ↗
- Who funds Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds The Pierpont Morgan Library ↗
- Who funds ORGANIZATION FOR TROPICAL STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RIDGEFIELD ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CHARLES RIVER MUSEUM OF INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Endeavor Health Clinical Operations ↗
- Who funds BEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I ↗
- Who funds GRACE CHURCH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE WINSOR SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT ↗
- Who funds Eagle Mount ↗
- Who funds HUDSON GUILDINC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Union Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Amelia Peabody Charitable Fund Trust · Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Analog Devices Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ruggles Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Abilis Inc — 74% of income from government
- Plummer Youth Promise Inc — 64% of income from government
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- Center for Women & Enterprise Inc — 27% of income from government
- Root Ns Inc — 26% of income from government
- International Institute of New England Inc — 24% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Regional Hospice and Home Care of Western Connecticut Inc — 17% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc — 11% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- Food Link Inc — 9% of income from government
- Wellspring House Inc — 9% of income from government
- Watch Inc — 9% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- American Antiquarian Society — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Rvnahealth Inc — 2% of income from government
- Essex County Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- American Physical Society — 1% of income from government
- Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
- Act of Connecticut — 1% of income from government
- Beacon Academy Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Ridgefield Playhouse for Movies and the Performing Arts Inc — 1% of income from government
- Museum of Science — 0% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.