Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ruggles Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
94
Grants FY2025still arriving
19
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$2.4MYouth Development$2.0MEducation$1.9MArts & Culture$1.5MScience & Tech$1.3MHuman Services$771kEnvironment$763kPhilanthropy$488kOther$0
02FY2025 · 94 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $127k
  • $10k–50k44 grants · $833k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$10,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE$400,000
RUDY RUGGLES JR FAMILY FUND - BESSEMER GIVING FUND$200,000
J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE$200,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL$75,000
ACT A CONTEMPORARY THEATRE OF CT$75,000
UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND$75,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$60,000
AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC$50,000
AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY$50,000
SIGMA XI THE SCIENTIFIC$50,000
TROUT UNLIMITED$50,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$50,000
SCARBOROUGH LAND TRUST$50,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$45,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DESTIN HARVEST: $10k → 8%SAWUBONA INC: $10k → 9%PREBLE STREET: $5k → 7%SHE'S THE FIRST: $10k → 17%PREBLE STREET: $5k → 7%SHE'S THE FIRST: $5k → 17%SAWUBONA INC: $5k → 9%REGIONAL HOSPICE: $10k → 9%REGIONAL HOSPICE: $10k → 9%PINE STREET INN: $75k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $20k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $20k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $15k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $15k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%PROSPECTS OPPORTUNITY AND ENRICHMENT INC: $20k → 9%ROOM TO GROW: $8k → 16%ROOM TO GROW: $8k → 16%HUDSON GUILD: $15k → 17%DIGNITY MATTERS: $20k → 8%HUDSON GUILD: $15k → 17%DIGNITY MATTERS: $20k → 8%HUDSON GUILD: $15k → 17%DIGNITY MATTERS: $15k → 8%HUDSON GUILD: $10k → 17%DIGNITY MATTERS: $10k → 8%HUDSON GUILD: $10k → 17%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $400k → 10%HUDSON GUILD: $10k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM: $20k → 8%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $150k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM: $20k → 8%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $150k → 10%HUDSON GUILD: $10k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM: $20k → 8%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $150k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM: $20k → 8%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $150k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM: $20k → 8%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $20k → 10%THE PLUMMER HOME FOR BOYS INC: $20k → 10%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $20k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM: $10k → 8%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM: $10k → 8%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM: $10k → 8%WOMEN IN NEED -WIN: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
SC
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 126 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

126 repeat relationships — 84 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

126
35

Total granted

$12M
$650k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+26%

Still filing today

68%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $374k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureScience & TechInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +111%
  • TP
    The Pierpont Morgan Library
    7× · 2017–2025 · $239k · revenue +109%
  • OF
    ORGANIZATION FOR TROPICAL STUDIES INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $215k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • DH
    DANBURY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $140k
  • FO
    FOUNDATIONS OF NUVANCE HEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · $90k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $60k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
7
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
8
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

10
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
11
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
12
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Side Center for Community Life and the most unlike its peers is The 5 Gyres Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Development CentersEnvironmental Conservation …Public Library OperationsFood Banks and PantriesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Elementary Literacy TutoringCommunity Arts CentersAnimal Rescue and ShelterChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Equine Therapy ProgramsImmigrant Worker SupportSchool District FoundationsCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Independent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%32%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%1/119
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,446

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 175 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
118/118
Grantees still filing
82/118
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $482,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $346,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGCS CAPITAL CAMPAIGN — $325,000 · OtherACT A CONTEMPORARY THEATRE OF CT — $300,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL — $280,000 · OtherFRONTLINE JOURNALISM FUND — $225,000 · OtherBOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $220,000 · Other+103 more — $4,018,494 · Other+103 moreUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND — $340,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …The Pierpont Morgan Library — $238,800 · EducationThe Pierpont M…THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY — $175,000 · EducationTHE NEWBERRY L…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $125,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNI…GRACE CHURCH SCHOOL — $125,000 · EducationGRACE CHURCH S…THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL — $105,000 · EducationTHE HOTCHKISS …THE WINSOR SCHOOL — $100,000 · EducationTHE WINSOR SCH…BOZEMAN SUMMIT SCHOOL INC — $85,000 · EducationTHE GO PROJECT INC — $75,000 · EducationAMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY — $75,000 · EducationESPERANZA ACADEMY INC — $70,000 · EducationHord Foundation Inc — $65,000 · EducationThe New School — $60,000 · Education+10 more — $137,084 · Education+10 morePLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC — $1,060,000 · Human ServicesPLUMMER YOUTH …PINE STREET INN INC — $175,000 · Human ServicesPINE STREET IN…The Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children — $130,000 · Human ServicesThe Childrens …HUDSON GUILDINC — $90,000 · Human ServicesDignity Matters Inc — $65,000 · Human Services+10 more — $190,000 · Human Services+10 moreTHE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC — $740,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DREAMY…MUSEUM OF SCIENCE — $190,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF …CHARLES RIVER MUSEUM OF INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION INC — $131,000 · Arts & CultureCHARLES RI…ACT OF CONNECTICUT — $85,000 · Arts & CultureACT OF CON…THE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $50,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more — $45,500 · Arts & CultureDanbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc — $940,000 · HealthDanbury H…Endeavor Health Clinical Operations — $125,000 · HealthEndeavor …THE VINCENT CLUB INC — $50,000 · Health+2 more — $13,500 · HealthJ CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE — $820,000 · Science & TechAMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY — $135,000 · Science & Tech+4 more — $53,500 · Science & TechORGANIZATION FOR TROPICAL STUDIES INC — $215,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $55,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $50,000 · InternationalTHE BILL COOK FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · InternationalHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $20,000 · International+1 more — $7,000 · International
Other$6,197,194Education$1,775,884Human Services$1,710,000Arts & Culture$1,241,500Health$1,128,500Science & Tech$1,008,500International$372,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC — $1,060,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetDanbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc — $940,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetJ CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE — $820,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetTHE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC — $740,000 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND — $340,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pierpont Morgan Library — $238,800 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR TROPICAL STUDIES INC — $215,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetMUSEUM OF SCIENCE — $190,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC — $175,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY — $175,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RIDGEFIELD — $150,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetAMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY — $135,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLES RIVER MUSEUM OF INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION INC — $131,000 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetThe Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children — $130,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $125,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEndeavor Health Clinical Operations — $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I — $125,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetGRACE CHURCH SCHOOL — $125,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC — $120,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL — $105,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WINSOR SCHOOL — $100,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT — $100,000 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetEagle Mount — $90,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetHUDSON GUILDINC — $90,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBOZEMAN LIBRARY FRIENDS AND FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetACT OF CONNECTICUT — $85,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBOZEMAN SUMMIT SCHOOL INC — $85,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC — $83,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $80,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetTHE GO PROJECT INC — $75,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY — $75,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $72,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetESPERANZA ACADEMY INC — $70,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetHord Foundation Inc — $65,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetROOT NS INC — $65,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetDignity Matters Inc — $65,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC — $62,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe New School — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBozeman Deaconess Foundation — $57,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VINCENT CLUB INC — $50,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRVNAHEALTH INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD LINK INC — $47,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCENTER FOR WOMEN & ENTERPRISE INC — $42,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC — $35,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetKIDS IN CRISIS INC — $33,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC
  • Who funds Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc
  • Who funds J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE
  • Who funds THE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND
  • Who funds The Pierpont Morgan Library
  • Who funds ORGANIZATION FOR TROPICAL STUDIES INC
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF SCIENCE
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC
  • Who funds THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RIDGEFIELD
  • Who funds AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds CHARLES RIVER MUSEUM OF INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION INC
  • Who funds The Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Endeavor Health Clinical Operations
  • Who funds BEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I
  • Who funds GRACE CHURCH SCHOOL
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC
  • Who funds THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL
  • Who funds THE WINSOR SCHOOL
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT
  • Who funds Eagle Mount
  • Who funds HUDSON GUILDINC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA27× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Union Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Amelia Peabody Charitable Fund Trust · Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Analog Devices Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ruggles Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 210%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • Abilis Inc74% of income from government
  • Plummer Youth Promise Inc64% of income from government
  • Kids in Crisis Inc49% of income from government
  • Center for Women & Enterprise Inc27% of income from government
  • Root Ns Inc26% of income from government
  • International Institute of New England Inc24% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc22% of income from government
  • Regional Hospice and Home Care of Western Connecticut Inc17% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc11% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc11% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
  • Food Link Inc9% of income from government
  • Wellspring House Inc9% of income from government
  • Watch Inc9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
  • American Antiquarian Society7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Rvnahealth Inc2% of income from government
  • Essex County Community Foundation Inc2% of income from government
  • American Physical Society1% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club1% of income from government
  • Act of Connecticut1% of income from government
  • Beacon Academy Inc1% of income from government
  • The Ridgefield Playhouse for Movies and the Performing Arts Inc1% of income from government
  • Museum of Science0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
21get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 175 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph