Skip to content

Michigan · Nonprofit

BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER

BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER (Michigan) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,400,314 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF BAY COUNTY ($605,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$2.0M
Funders on record
23
Grants received
$1.4M
Net assets
$3.6M
12/23 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 17%
01What it does

What Bay Area Women's Center does

Mission

To end domestic violence and sexual assault in our community.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Domestic violence programin 2025, the organization served as a critical lifeline for survivors escaping domestic violence. Through emergency shelter, counseling, advocacy, and long term support, we provided safety, stability, and hope to individuals facing life threatening situations.- 235 survivors (106 adults and 129 children) found protection and stability in our emergency shelter, totaling 9,661 nights of safe housing.- residents received 28,983 meals, ensuring consistent nourishment during periods of crisis and transition.- our staff provided 2,123 hours of trauma informed counseling, advocacy, and safety planning, helping survivors regain confidence, rebuild their support networks, and pursue independent futures.our comprehensive services helped break cycles of abuse and empowered families to rebuild their lives with dignity and security.

    $864,420 spentof which $158,015 as grants
    69% of program spending
  2. Community services & prevention educationthe organization strengthened community safety by delivering proactive prevention and education programs that address the root causes of domestic violence and sexual assault. By engaging schools, businesses, and civic groups, we increased awareness, reduced stigma, and equipped community members with the tools to identify and prevent abuse.- approximately 2,954 youth and adults participated in interactive prevention education sessions focused on healthy relationships, consent, conflict resolution, and community responsibility.these programs expanded the community's capacity to recognize warning signs, intervene safely, and promote cultures of respect and non violence.

    $85,690 spent
    7% of program spending
  3. Sexual assault and sexual assault nurse examiner (sane) programsour sexual assault and sane programs ensured that survivors received immediate, compassionate, and expert care following an assault. Through a combination of emotional support, medical forensic services, and advocacy, we helped survivors navigate one of the most difficult moments of their lives.- 85 survivors (51 adults and 34 children) received crisis intervention, advocacy, and ongoing emotional support.- 21 survivorsincluding 16 adults/adolescents and 5 children under 12received highly specialized sexual assault nurse exams, providing critical medical care and forensic documentation.- our trained staff delivered 407 hours of trauma informed counseling and advocacy, supporting survivors throughout medical, legal, and emotional recovery.these services upheld the dignity of survivors, improved access to justice, and strengthened the community's response to sexual violence.

    $299,878 spentof which $210 as grants
    24% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,249,988.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.3M) Expenses 100 ($1.2M) Net assets 100 ($2.1M)2018 Revenue 89 ($1.2M) Expenses 100 ($1.2M) Net assets 98 ($2.1M)2019 Revenue 102 ($1.4M) Expenses 100 ($1.2M) Net assets 104 ($2.2M)2020 Revenue 117 ($1.6M) Expenses 109 ($1.4M) Net assets 114 ($2.4M)2021 Revenue 125 ($1.7M) Expenses 100 ($1.2M) Net assets 134 ($2.8M)2022 Revenue 118 ($1.6M) Expenses 110 ($1.4M) Net assets 140 ($3.0M)2023 Revenue 120 ($1.6M) Expenses 120 ($1.5M) Net assets 147 ($3.1M)2024 Revenue 136 ($1.8M) Expenses 133 ($1.6M) Net assets 157 ($3.3M)2025 Revenue 150 ($2.0M) Expenses 137 ($1.7M) Net assets 172 ($3.6M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (150)Expenses (137)Net assets (172)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $2.3M to $2.7M (+17%).

$2.3M
$2.2M
$2.3M
$2.7M
$2.9M
$3.0M
$3.2M
$3.4M
$3.8M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 57% · 2018 57% · 2019 57% · 2020 60% · 2021 54% · 2022 58% · 2023 60% · 2024 60% · 2025 60%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$94k
’17
−$47k
’18
$124k
’19
$210k
’20
$429k
’21
$211k
’22
$116k
’23
$167k
’24
$309k
’25
4.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Jeremy Rick

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed14171520202020912
Joined·+3+6+11+1+1+3+1+3
No longer listed·086113120
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 11 funders, grant income rose $50k → $190k.

3 of 23 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 18% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 71%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

63% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER.

43%
largest funder
71%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 75% · 2019 52% · 2020 54% · 2021 64% · 2022 49% · 2023 69% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

57% of BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 52% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

98% of BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER's grant income comes from Michigan funders.

MI
OH
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Michigan out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $247k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

74% of spending goes to programs.

Program 74%Management 22%Fundraising 4%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

96%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MI

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER?
BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER (Michigan) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,400,314 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF BAY COUNTY ($605,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER have?
IRS filings report 23 organizations giving $1,400,314 in grants to BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER?
UNITED WAY OF BAY COUNTY is the largest funder on record, with $605,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Bay Area Women's Center →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 23 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing