· Private foundation
The Engh Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $210k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $495k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ART | $245,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER TETON | $150,000 |
| ST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF JH WY | $50,000 |
| CONSTELLATION FUND | $50,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE | $35,000 |
| ONE22 INC | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE PRADO MUSEUM | $25,000 |
| WYOMING IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY PROJECT | $25,000 |
| ASTORIA PARK CONSERVANCY | $20,000 |
| GRACE-TRINITY COMMUNITY CHURCH | $15,000 |
| MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC | $15,000 |
| PROJECT SUCCESS | $10,000 |
| JACKSON HOLE FOOD & WINE | $10,000 |
| GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN | $10,000 |
| HOLE FOOD RESCUE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MSMINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS5× · 2020–2024 · $765k · revenue +73%
- HFHabitat for Humanity of the Greater Teton Area4× · 2020–2024 · $300k · revenue +17%
- TCThe Constellation Fund3× · 2022–2024 · $110k · revenue +60%
Funded once
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCone grant, 2023 · $50k
- SJST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF JH NYone grant, 2023 · $50k
- PSPROJECT SUCCESSone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…
The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…
The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Wyofile is an independent, nonprofit news service focused on the people, places and policy of wyoming. recognizing the rapid decline in resources among traditional news outlets, wyofile offers in-depth coverage of complicated subjects and…
To attract, recruit, advance, and retain attorneys of color in the twin cities through education and collaboration with member organizations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Walker Art Center and the most unlike its peers is Project Success. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of the Greater Teton Area ↗
- Who funds One22 Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
- Who funds American Friends of the Prado Museum ↗
- Who funds The Constellation Fund ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SUCCESS ↗
- Who funds Astoria Park Conservancy ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HOLE FOOD & WINE ↗
- Who funds WYOMING IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ALIGHT ↗
- Who funds MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC ↗
- Who funds TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC ↗
- Who funds Hole Food Rescue ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SUCCESS ↗
- Who funds WALKER ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID OF WYOMING INC ↗
- Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE WYOMING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND ↗
- Who funds THE FILM SOCIETY OF MINNEAPOLIS ST PAUL ↗
- Who funds COLGATE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · The Minneapolis Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Ladd Family Foundation · Hughes Charitable Foundation · The Andrew Allen Charitable Foundation · Robins Kaplan Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Engh Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Engh Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Engh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.