Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Roost Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Youth Development$144kHealth$113kHuman Services$63kRecreation & Sports$33kAnimals$33kPhilanthropy$30kMembership Benefit$15kArts & Culture$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$443k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF SIOUX CITY$50,000
ST JOHN'S CEMETARY ASSOCIATION$15,000
BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
UNITY POINT HEALTH ST LUKES FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%CRITTENTON CENTER: $6k → 13%GOSPEL MISSION: $10k → 13%GOSPEL MISSION: $10k → 13%GOSPEL MISSION: $5k → 13%GOSPEL MISSION: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$338k · 8 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$338k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+100%

Still filing today

63%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsInternationalEducationRecreation & SportsMembership BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SIOUXLAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $33k · revenue +41%
  • TC
    THE CRITTENTON CENTER
    2× · 2021–2023 · $16k · revenue +131%
  • OU
    OPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED
    2× · 2021–2023 · $11k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • NS
    NORTH SOUND FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -78%
  • MR
    MISSOURI RIVER BOAT CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sioux City Lewis & Clark Association
Arts & Culture
2
Sioux Falls Environmental Access Inc
3
Sioux City Housing Trust Fund Inc

To act as the local governing board of sioux city housing trust fund by collecting and disbursing revenue for the purpose of encouraging the development and redevelopment of affordable housing for sioux city's income qualified residents.

Housing & Shelter
4
Siouxland Chamber of Commerce

Improve the quality of the siouxland area

5
Sioux City Jewish Cemetery Association

Cemetery care and maintenance

6
Siouxland Habitat for Humanity

To provide affordable housing for low-income families

7
Siouxland Community Health Foundation

The foundation provides support for community health. it helps eliminate barriers and improves the health of the community.

Health
8
St Francis House of Sioux Falls

Ecumenical not-for-profit transitional living facility for the homeless in sioux falls, south dakota. purpose is to offer hospitality, fellowship and support to those who have nowhere to sleep.

9
Saint Gabriel Communications Ltd

Operation of a radio station to service as a ministry

Religion
10
Sioux Center Christian School

Christian education grade school

Education
11
Southeastern North Dakota Community Action Agency

Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…

Human Services
12
Greater Sioux Community Health Center Inc

The mission of promise community health center is to provide accessible, holistic health care that adapts to the needs of the community to improve the wellbeing of all persons.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Siouxland Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is St John's Cemetery Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF SIOUX CITY — $127,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS HOME OF SIOUX CITYBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA — $15,000 · OtherYELLOW DOG AUCTION CLUB — $11,000 · OtherOPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED — $11,000 · Other+8 more — $47,500 · Other+8 moreTHE GOSPEL MISSION — $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE GOSPEL …THE CRITTENTON CENTER — $16,000 · Human ServicesTHE CRITTEN…SIOUXLAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $32,500 · AnimalsSIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $30,000 · PhilanthropySt John's Cemetery Association — $15,000 · Membership BenefitNORTH SOUND FOUNDATION — $15,000 · InternationalBRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationSIOUX CITY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$312,000Human Services$46,000Animals$32,500Philanthropy$30,000Membership Benefit$15,000International$15,000Education$10,000Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSIOUXLAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $32,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GOSPEL MISSION — $30,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CRITTENTON CENTER — $16,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSt John's Cemetery Association — $15,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetNORTH SOUND FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED — $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIOUXLAND COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN — $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSIOUX CITY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SIOUXLAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds SIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE GOSPEL MISSION
  • Who funds THE CRITTENTON CENTER
  • Who funds St John's Cemetery Association
  • Who funds NORTH SOUND FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED
  • Who funds BRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SIOUXLAND COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN
  • Who funds SIOUX CITY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S HEALTH FOUNDATION OF SIOUX CITY IOWA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Waitt FoundationSD20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Waitt Foundation · Siouxland Community Foundation · Missouri River Historical Development Inc · The Roth & Letch Family Charitable Foundation · The Chesterman Family Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Roost Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Roost Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Roost Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph