· Public charity
Iowa Women's Foundation
The IOWA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION is committed to improving the lives of iowa's women and girls.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $165,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $304,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $139,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GIRLS ON THE RUN EASTERN IOWA | $25,000 |
| CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER | $25,000 |
| EYES OPEN IOWA | $25,000 |
| LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA | $25,000 |
| GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY | $25,000 |
| YWCA OF CLINTON IOWA | $25,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER IOWA | $7,500 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $503k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMCATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER INC5× · 2018–2024 · $61k · revenue +267%
- IJIOWA JOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES INC2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +95%
- GIGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY2× · 2022–2024 · $50k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- YWYOUNG WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTERone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +6%
- SISCKIC Incone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -16%
- ICIOWA CITY SOBER LIVINGone grant, 2022 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Child day care center
Provide childhood daycare.
To ensure that every child has access to high quality early care and education through integrated support and equitable practices.
In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.
Through dynamic partnerships, quality family services, advocacy and education, neicac advances community development and improves social and economic conditions for individuals and families with limited resources.
Child care services
Committed to providing families with the highest standard of child-inspired, professionally-nurtured care and opportunities for learning.
Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…
ICCJ assists children in custody disputes through child focused education and legal services. ICCJ provides education and legal services on a reduced fee or at no charge based on the ability to pay.
To promote the development, growth and utilization of childrens advocacy centers and multidisciplinary teams to better serve Iowas abused and neglected children and their families.
The center strives to provide a range of services that support working parents while fostering the emotional, social, physical and intellectual growth of their children. special consideration is given to low income families and families…
To offer quality child care at affordable prices.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waypoint Services and the most unlike its peers is Leadher. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 55. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 11% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC ↗
- Who funds CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA JOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF EASTERN IOWA ↗
- Who funds HAWKEYE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDN ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF CLINTON IOWA ↗
- Who funds St Mark Youth Enrichment ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds HOMES OF OAKRIDGE HUMAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Future Net Incorporated ↗
- Who funds STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOMEN FOOD & AGRICULTURE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SCKIC Inc ↗
- Who funds IOWA CITY SOBER LIVING ↗
- Who funds LAKE CITY DAY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds NEWBO CITY MARKET ↗
- Who funds GRIN & GROW LTD ↗
- Who funds WAYPOINT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds SUMNER DAYCARE & LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE 4-C S COMMITTEE OF JOHNSON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Williamsburg Community Child Care Center ↗
- Who funds RINGGOLD COUNTY CHILD CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds LATINAS LATINOS AL EXITO INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WAVERLY CHILD CARE & PRESCHOOL ↗
- Who funds LITTLE CHARGER EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NISAA AFRICAN FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NOBLE INITIATIVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL BLUFFS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds MICAH HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LITTLE KNIGHTS LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEAL SOCIETY OF IOWA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Delta Dental of Iowa Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · GreenState Credit Union · Max and Helen Guernsey Charitable Foundation · Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Dupaco RW Hoefer Foundation · Variety - the Children's Charity of Iowa · United Way of Central Iowa · Community Foundation of Johnson County · Lsb Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Iowa Women's Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.