Missouri · Nonprofit
FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC
FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC (Missouri) receives grants from 52 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,987,751 to it, the largest being MATTHEW HILL FOUNDATION INC ($1,678,425). 22 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC is better cushioned than half of the 3,968 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,968 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Give Lively Foundation Incshared funders
- Cancer Support Communityportfolio match
- Tap Cancer Out Incportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2020 4% · 2021 9% · 2023 12%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
95% of FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (51% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 7 funders to 19 funders, grant income fell $572k → $232k.
13 of 52 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 35% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 52 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 56% of grant income and the top three 74%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
93% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 92% · 2018 91% · 2019 83% · 2020 84% · 2021 31% · 2022 29% · 2023 40% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
30% of FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 42% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Missouri, across 18 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.0M arriving through sponsors registered in 10 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 52 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Give Lively Foundation Incshared fundersNY · backs 219 organizations that share your funders
- Cancer Support Communityportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Tap Cancer Out Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- 24 Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Tower Cancer Research Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Center for American Progressportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ambers Antibodies Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Karl Friedman Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Trunk Is Up Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Our American Future Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Tisbest Philanthropyshared fundersWA · backs 121 organizations that share your funders
- Givinga Foundation Incshared fundersMA · backs 132 organizations that share your funders
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Missouri
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
80% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
68%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 9 states
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC?
- FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC (Missouri) receives grants from 52 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,987,751 to it, the largest being MATTHEW HILL FOUNDATION INC ($1,678,425). 22 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC have?
- IRS filings report 52 organizations giving $2,987,751 in grants to FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC, 22 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC?
- MATTHEW HILL FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $1,678,425 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 52funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing