· Public charity
Act for Alexandria
Amplify the work of our community by bringing people and resources together.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 108 grants below total $3,450,949 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,884,887 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $433,938 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k34 grants · $232k
- $10k–50k63 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k8 grants · $548k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $788,280 |
| ALEXANDRIA SEAPORT FOUNDATION | $408,250 |
| VIRGINIA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| NUEVA VIDA INC | $82,600 |
| THE CHILD & FAMILY NETWORK CENTERS | $81,100 |
| HAVERFORD COLLEGE | $71,806 |
| CITY OF ALEXANDRIA (OFFICE OF HISTORIC ALEXANDRIA) | $67,544 |
| THE SPITFIRE CLUB | $65,600 |
| CHRIST CHURCH | $64,000 |
| ALIVE | $61,288 |
| CASA CHIRILAGUA | $53,750 |
| COMMUNITY LODGINGS INC | $44,850 |
| CENTER FOR ALEXANDRIA'S CHILDREN | $44,710 |
| WETA | $44,000 |
| THE CAMPAGNA CENTER | $43,950 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
161 repeat relationships — 83 still active in FY2024, 78 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $227k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CAMPAGNA CENTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +33%
- ACAFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC4× · 2020–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +79%
- AIALIVE Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $902k · revenue +81%
Funded once
- KFKids First Yearsone grant, 2022 · $347k · revenue -34%
- ECETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DEV COUNCIL INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $218k · revenue +567%
- RRECOVERYPARKone grant, 2019 · $116k · revenue -76%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Amplify the work of our community by bringing people and resources together.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Acrp promotes excellence in clinical research. we support clinical research professionals through training and development, the exchange of ideas and expertise, and certification. we serve as the preferred source for quality tools,…
The mission of vt-arc is to extend the impact of the virginia tech research and innovation enterprise, delivering superior analytic and technology solutions to government and non-government customers.
The university of virginia law school foundation's primary purpose is to receive, manage and expend funds for the benefit of the university of virginia school of law.
The mission of the school is to provide outstanding legal education in a collegial and supportive environment with attention to newly emerging areas of law, particularly those related to technological development, globalization and the…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Trade association for electric cooperatives
To deliver important healthcare services with exceptional quality and patient-centered care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Alexandria's Children and the most unlike its peers is Chrysalis Development Group Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
218 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 218 of the 301 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CAMPAGNA CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds ALIVE Inc ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TENANTS AND WORKERS UNITED ↗
- Who funds THE CHILD AND FAMILY NETWORK CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Alexandria Seaport Foundation ↗
- Who funds Virginia Health Care Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Community Lodgings Inc ↗
- Who funds Move2Learn ↗
- Who funds NUEVA VIDA INC ↗
- Who funds CARPENTER'S SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds ENDEPENDENCE CENTER OF NORTHERN VA ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL - BASILICA OF ST MARY CONFERENCE ↗
- Who funds CASA CHIRILAGUA ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR ALEXANDRIA'S CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Together We Bake ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Kids First Years ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH ↗
- Who funds WESLEY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DEV COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds Northern Virginia Community College Educational Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds EDU-FUTURO ↗
- Who funds SCAN OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds ALEXANDRIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF ALEXANDRIA ↗
- Who funds AHC INC ↗
- Who funds SPACE OF HER OWN INC ↗
- Who funds Offender Aid & Restoration Arlington Co OAR Arlington Alexandria Falls Church ↗
- Who funds SPITFIRE CLUB ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Bruhn-Morris Family Foundation Inc · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Arlington Community Foundation · Ivakota Assoc Inc · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Calvert and Sally Simmons Foundation · Washington Forrest Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · The Maple Tree Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Act for Alexandria funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Melwood Horticultural Training Center Inc — 73% of income from government
- Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Capital Hospice — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.