· Public charity
Tucson Conquistadores Inc
The Tucson Conquistadores and its members are dedicated to continuing the tradition of professional golf in Tucson, and promoting interest in amateur athletics among youth, particularly disadvantaged and physically and mentally challenged children.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 18 grants below total $321,808 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $392,273 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $70,465 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $158k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Conquistadores Youth Golf Fund First Tee Tucson | $58,650 |
| Colon Cancer Coalition | $51,000 |
| Special Olympics | $30,000 |
| Amphi Foundation | $30,000 |
| Banner Health Foundation | $25,000 |
| Educational Enrichment Foundation | $20,000 |
| YMCA of Southern AZ | $15,000 |
| American Junior Golf Association (AJGA) | $15,000 |
| Pima County Junior Soccer League | $12,500 |
| Boys and Girls Club of Tucson | $10,475 |
| USA Youth Sports | $8,000 |
| Victory Sports Foundation | $7,500 |
| St Paul Methodist Church Basketball League | $7,500 |
| University of AZ Tucson Village Farm | $7,178 |
| Marana Football Boosters Club | $6,800 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $136k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CYConquistadores Youth Golf Fund2× · 2023–2025 · $89k · revenue +25%
- SOSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC2× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +2%
- AJAmerican Junior Golf Association Inc2× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- CCCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +42%
- FCFIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +35%
- YOYMCA OF SOUTHERN ARIZONAone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
It is the mission of asa to foster the physical, mental, and emotional growth and development of the state of arizonas youth through the sport of soccer at all levels, ages, and competition levels.
Tyfsf is a leader in youth sports and the advocate for the advancement of sportsmanship, competitive spirit and recreation by providing educational and developmental opportunities, generating and sharing knowledge with the community, and…
The Tucson Conquistadores and its members are dedicated to continuing the tradition of professional golf in Tucson, and promoting interest in amateur athletics among youth, particularly disadvantaged and physically and mentally challenged…
Dedicated to the development of youth in soccer, providing opportunities to promote healthy living, good sportsmanship, and leadership skills through athletics and most importantly, encouraging our players to use soccer as a vehicle to…
None
Our mission is to promote and develop the growth of tennis in the southwest
To provide world-class experiences for college student-athletes, fans, and the local community, culminating in a nationally recognized college football competition.
The fiesta sports foundation is home to the premier college football playoff postseason game, the vrbo fiesta bowl, the fan-friendly rate bowl and multiple year-round live sports and entertainment events that fuel our mission to deliver…
To promote, govern, oversee, plan and coordinate amateur indoor and outdoor volleyball in the arizona region, in order to provide a variety of opportunities for all interested parties to participate in a safe, positive and appropriately…
The objective of Arizona FC shall be to promote soccer as a sport, to organize soccer teams, to provide training in the sport of soccer, both youth and adult, and to receive gifts or donations to promote the health, welfare and recreation…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Arizona Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pima Association of Governments. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Tucson Conquistadores Foundation ↗
- Who funds COLON CANCER COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds Conquistadores Youth Golf Fund ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds Amphitheater Public Schools Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds American Junior Golf Association Inc ↗
- Who funds EL RIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC ↗
- Who funds COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Banner Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PIMA COUNTY JUNIOR SOCCER LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds PERIMETER BICYCLING ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds GW SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH IMPACT PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds PIMA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS ↗
- Who funds All In Youth Pickleball ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds Marana Football Booster Club ↗
- Who funds LAPAN COLLEGE & CAREER CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds TUCSON SEMINOLES YOUTH SPORTS ↗
- Who funds EL GRUPO YOUTH CYCLING ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tucson Conquistadores Foundation · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Social Venture Partners Tucson · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Tucson Medical Center · Angel Charity for Children Inc · Fiesta Events Inc · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tucson Conquistadores Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.