Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

EMBRACE WASHINGTON

EMBRACE WASHINGTON (Washington) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $679,014 to it, the largest being M J MURDOCK CHARITABLE TRUST ($162,500). 14 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$463k
Funders on record
23
Grants received
$679k
Net assets
$350k
14/23 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 45%
01What it does

What Embrace Washington does

Mission

Providing support for foster care children and parents

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Providing duffle bags to foster children for their belongings during emergency relocations. Providing an annual christmas party, complete with breakfast, gifts, and picture with santa for foster families. Assisting foster families with items (beds, high-chairs, car seats, etc.) needed in order to have foster children in their homes. This activity impacted over 930 individuals involved in the foster care system.

    $105,824 spent
    59% of program spending
  2. Embrace Washington's wish is a program to grant wishes such as: sports scholarships, educational support and technology, supplies for infants and toddlers, summer camps and extra curricular activities, and beds and bedding for placements for foster children.

    $55,788 spent
    31% of program spending
  3. Embrace Washington's education program allows foster children & foster families to get individual and specialized assistance with their education. Many children in foster care fall behind educationally and because of the trauma they sustain it can be difficult to get them caught up. We work with trauma trained educators to enable children in foster care to have the opportunity to thrive in their education.

    $16,465 spent
    9% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $178,077.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($164k) Expenses 100 ($101k) Net assets 100 ($94k)2018 Revenue 121 ($199k) Expenses 168 ($169k) Net assets 132 ($123k)2019 Revenue 145 ($238k) Expenses 195 ($196k) Net assets 176 ($165k)2020 Revenue 208 ($341k) Expenses 248 ($250k) Net assets 274 ($256k)2021 Revenue 254 ($418k) Expenses 330 ($333k) Net assets 364 ($341k)2022 Revenue 260 ($427k) Expenses 408 ($412k) Net assets 381 ($357k)2023 Revenue 181 ($298k) Expenses 328 ($331k) Net assets 346 ($324k)2024 Revenue 208 ($342k) Expenses 365 ($369k) Net assets 318 ($298k)2025 Revenue 281 ($463k) Expenses 406 ($410k) Net assets 375 ($350k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (281)Expenses (406)Net assets (375)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $166k to $258k (+56%).

$94k
$124k
$166k
$258k
$343k
$363k
$343k
$317k
$363k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

77% of EMBRACE WASHINGTON’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (91% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 23,870 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$64k
’17
$30k
’18
$42k
’19
$91k
’20
$86k
’21
$16k
’22
−$33k
’23
−$26k
’24
$53k
’25
8.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2019 and FY2020, and between the FY2021 and FY2022 filings.

2019202020212022202320242025
Listed12141413161313
Joined·+5+0+5+4+4+3
No longer listed·306173
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 12 funders, grant income rose $6k → $104k.

8 of 23 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 27% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of EMBRACE WASHINGTON’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 22 of 23 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

EMBRACE WASHINGTON has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 24% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

64% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund EMBRACE WASHINGTON.

24%
largest funder
55%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 91% · 2019 100% · 2020 48% · 2021 44% · 2022 30% · 2023 23% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

67% of EMBRACE WASHINGTON's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 61% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

69% of EMBRACE WASHINGTON's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
ID
CA
DE
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $183k arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

EMBRACE WASHINGTON runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 13,062 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin11% · above the median
Months of reserve8.7mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)14% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,062 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like EMBRACE WASHINGTON

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

43% of spending goes to programs.

Program 43%Management 57%Fundraising 0%

Governance

13
board members
62%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for EMBRACE WASHINGTON: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds EMBRACE WASHINGTON?
EMBRACE WASHINGTON (Washington) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $679,014 to it, the largest being M J MURDOCK CHARITABLE TRUST ($162,500). 14 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does EMBRACE WASHINGTON have?
IRS filings report 23 organizations giving $679,014 in grants to EMBRACE WASHINGTON, 14 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of EMBRACE WASHINGTON?
M J MURDOCK CHARITABLE TRUST is the largest funder on record, with $162,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like EMBRACE WASHINGTON find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Embrace Washington →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 23 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing