· Public charity
One Eighty Foundation
Our mission: the ONE EIGHTY FOUNDATION provides grants to non-profit organizations that immediately impact the lives of children and families in our community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $138,312 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $244,198 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $105,886 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $108k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SEATTLE'S UNION GOSPEL MISSION | $33,110 |
| TOYS FOR KIDS | $20,000 |
| THE WRIGHT WAY FOUNDATION | $19,756 |
| HILLSIDE CONNECTION | $12,765 |
| VINE MAPLE PLACE | $12,000 |
| THE CRAYON INITIATIVE | $10,198 |
| DEMENTIA TOGETHER | $7,200 |
| CHAMP'S HEART | $6,500 |
| JOYA CHILD & FAMILY DEVELOPMENT | $6,243 |
| ST FELIX PANTRY | $5,275 |
| DAYSTAR KIDS | $5,265 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $382k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFTOYS FOR KIDS8× · 2017–2024 · $167k · revenue +47%
- VNVFW NATIONAL HOME4× · 2017–2023 · $90k · revenue +107%
- VMVINE MAPLE PLACE3× · 2022–2024 · $33k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- NWNorthwest Wine Benefit Foundation DBA Auction of Washington Winesone grant, 2018 · $44k · revenue -6%
- BBBELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $27k · revenue +43%
- RMRonald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Western Washington & Alaska supports families with seriously ill children by providing a caring home-away-from-home at the SEattle Ronald McDonald House and operating a house and a van service in…
United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.
Restoring hope, building futures, and strengthening our communities through programs with youth, young adults and families. we support the behavioral health of at-risk and in-crisis youth across the greater south king county area. we take…
To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.
Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.
Support people with disabilities and low incomes to realize their purpose, potential and strength.
Seattle children's hospital (seattle children's) will be an innovative leader in pediatric health and wellness through our unsurpassed quality, clinical care, relentless spirit of inquiry, and compassion for all children and their…
To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.
Seattle children's guild association advocates for seattle children's hospital through volunteer, philanthropic and community endeavors to ensure hope, excellent care and advanced cures for children.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Trufant Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
127 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 127 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TOYS FOR KIDS ↗
- Who funds VFW NATIONAL HOME ↗
- Who funds Northwest Wine Benefit Foundation DBA Auction of Washington Wines ↗
- Who funds RUSSELL WILSON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VINE MAPLE PLACE ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC ↗
- Who funds HARMONY HILL OF UNION ↗
- Who funds College Success Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE WRIGHT WAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ENCOMPASS NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds PCC FARMLAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds Hillside Connection ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
- Who funds CAMP KOREY ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY FEEDING PROGRAM OF SEATTLE & KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SONS OF NORWAY ↗
- Who funds The Crayon Initiative ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds LENNY WILKENS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO ↗
- Who funds UPLIFT NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds Sound Foundations NW ↗
- Who funds Dementia Together ↗
- Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds CHAMPS HEART INC ↗
- Who funds PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES ↗
- Who funds Spokane Guilds' School & Neuromuscular Center ↗
- Who funds ROOMS OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds GENESEE HILL SCHOOL PTA SEATTLE COUNCIL 6N-15-320 ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SCHOOL OF THE ARTS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Norcliffe Foundation · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Medina Foundation · Glassybaby White Light Fund · Aven Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Fales Foundation Trust · Moccasin Lake Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization One Eighty Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- High Point Treatment Center Inc — 20% of income from government
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to One Eighty Foundation?
Find your warmest path to One Eighty Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.