· Private foundation
Russell Colgate Fund Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k63 grants · $231k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $453k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $246k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEW YORK ACADEMY OF ART | $196,000 |
| GREENWICH HOSPITAL | $50,000 |
| MYRIAD USA INC | $34,428 |
| PROJECT BREAD | $30,213 |
| ARLINGTON EATS | $30,000 |
| DENOVA CENTER FOR JUSTICE | $30,000 |
| MEREVILLE FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL | $22,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA | $21,107 |
| PRINCETON UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| COLGATE UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH FDN | $20,000 |
| GUADALUPE CENTER | $15,000 |
| NOMADIC GUARDIANS FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| AUSABLE CLUB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $343k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
169 repeat relationships — 81 still active in FY2025, 88 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NYNEW YORK ACADEMY OF ART9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +14%
- NHNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $929k · revenue +3%
- CUCOLGATE UNIVERSITY9× · 2017–2025 · $380k · revenue +80%
Funded once
- MMMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +30%
- TMTHE METROPOLITAN MUSEUMone grant, 2017 · $15k
- PTPUBLIC THEATREone grant, 2020 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa and the most unlike its peers is Steve Nash Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
154 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 154 of the 261 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW YORK ACADEMY OF ART ↗
- Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLGATE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD ↗
- Who funds University of Santa Monica ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON EATS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE LOUVRE INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSING CORPORATION OF ARLINGTON ↗
- Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
- Who funds THE WELCOME PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds AUSABLE CLUB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RESPOND Inc ↗
- Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗
- Who funds SOMERVILLE HOMELESS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS ↗
- Who funds MYSTIC RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds GLEN COVE HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON LAND TRUST INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Meyer Memorial Trust · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · The Jackson Foundation · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · The Collins Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Mereville Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · John Mirak Foundation · The Stebbins Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Russell Colgate Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Morrison Child and Family Services — 91% of income from government
- Respond Inc — 80% of income from government
- Hacienda Community Development Corporation — 48% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Womanspace Inc — 47% of income from government
- Transition House Inc — 39% of income from government
- Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center Inc — 38% of income from government
- Asian Task Force Against Domestic Violence Inc — 32% of income from government
- Somerville Homeless Coalition Inc — 31% of income from government
- Roxbury Stone House Inc — 29% of income from government
- The Wallace Medical Concern — 27% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Cyrus E Dallin Art Museum Inc — 21% of income from government
- Mystic River Watershed Association Inc — 18% of income from government
- Ecotrust — 14% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- Raphael House of Portland — 10% of income from government
- De Novo Center for Justice and Healing — 9% of income from government
- Shelburne Museum Inc — 9% of income from government
- Impact Nw — 8% of income from government
- Arlington Eats Inc — 6% of income from government
- Arts Council of Princeton — 6% of income from government
- Together We Are Greater Than — 5% of income from government
- The Welcome Project Inc — 4% of income from government
- North By Northeast Community Health Center — 4% of income from government
- Arm in Arm Inc — 4% of income from government
- The Watershed Institute Inc — 3% of income from government
- Trillium Family Services — 2% of income from government
- Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild — 2% of income from government
- Caldera — 1% of income from government
- Bruce Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
- Greenwich Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Guadalupe Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Russell Colgate Fund Inc?
Find your warmest path to Russell Colgate Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.