· Private foundation
The David W Knapp Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER NEW HAVEN | $855 |
| NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE | $855 |
| ACLU FDN OF CONNECTICUT INC | $855 |
| LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION | $855 |
| CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE | $855 |
| AMERICAN YOUTH HOSTELS INC | $855 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND | $855 |
| HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION | $855 |
| GUILFORD FOUNDATION | $855 |
| SOULFORCE INC | $855 |
| UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST ROWE CAMP CONF | $855 |
| SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC | $855 |
| WNET 13 | $855 |
| NATIONAL AIDS MEMORIAL INC | $855 |
| ST MARTIN DE PORRES ACADEMY | $855 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
70 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $855 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PFPOINT FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +108%
- SHSHINING HOPE FOR COMMUNITIES INC5× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +89%
- SPSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC5× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- GFGUILFORD FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
- YYMCAone grant, 2022 · $2k
- HGHARTFORD GAY MENS CHORUS INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $850 · revenue +141%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To provide a transformative, practical, and excellent liberal arts education that produces critical thinkers in an inclusive, diverse environment, guided by quaker testimonies of community, equality, integrity, peace, and simplicity and…
The hartford foundation for public giving puts philanthropy into action to create lasting solutions that result in vibrant communities within the greater hartford region. as the region's community foundation, it is a public, grantmaking…
Over 9,000 clients are served by gmhc's programs each year. gmhc provides a broad array of programs through the efforts of clinicians, trained volunteers, and professional staff who identify undiagnosed cases on hiv, ensure access and…
Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…
Dedicated to learning, personal growth, knowledge creation, and the betterment of society. the university engages students in aquiring the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to thrive in and contribute to a pluralistic, complex world.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Ccp organizes, inspires, and equips a community of funders to learn, collaborate, and lead together for sustained impact and social change in connecticut.
To secure equal rights and protections for lgbtq utahns and their families.
The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Equality florida institute is the educational arm of the largest civil rights organization in florida dedicated to ending discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advancing Connecticut Together Inc and the most unlike its peers is Guilford Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GLAAD INC ↗
- Who funds POINT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHINING HOPE FOR COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ST MARTIN DE PORRES ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds EASTON MOUNTAIN INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN YOUTH HOSTELS INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE ↗
- Who funds SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds WNET ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL CONNECTICUT COAST YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST ROWE CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Ferry Beach Park Association ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HAVEN GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PFLAG ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
- Who funds SOULFORCE INC ↗
- Who funds National AIDS Memorial Inc ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds GUILFORD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Joe & Cindy Goldberg Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater New Haven Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · The Stoddard Family Foundation · The Guilford Foundation Inc · Newalliance Foundation Inc · MFUND Inc · Eder Family Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Peoples United Community Foundation · Yale University · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The David W Knapp Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Advancing Connecticut Together Inc — 100% of income from government
- Columbus House Inc — 100% of income from government
- Shoreline Greenway Trail Inc — 64% of income from government
- Christian Community Action Inc — 29% of income from government
- Central Connecticut Coast Young Men's Christian Association Inc — 14% of income from government
- Gather New Haven Inc (Formely New Haven Land Trust Inc) — 11% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc — 10% of income from government
- Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc — 3% of income from government
- Sacred Heart University Incorporated — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.