Skip to content

New York · Nonprofit

CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME

CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME (New York) receives grants from 101 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,348,299 to it, the largest being BELLOWS FAMILY FOUNDATION ($893,500). 53 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$1.9M
Funders on record
101
Grants received
$3.3M
Net assets
$-173251
53/101 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 31%
01What it does

What Camp Extreme D/B/A Project Extreme does

Mission

Project extreme provides innovative programming and solutions for teens in -need, their families and communities. Project extreme uses a combination of experiential and intellectual learning opportunities to provide the social, educational and emotional support our teens in need require and benefit from. Project extreme's layered array of year-round programs are designed as life-changing interventions to assist teens break the cycle of their anti social, sometimes dangerous, self-destructive behavior. Project extreme hosts a broad array of short and longer duration programs designed to assist teens in need and their families in addressing and overcoming the various challenges they are facing by providing them with: social support,, life-skills training, positive /healthy environment, self esteem and self worth development, fun and safe activities. Each of the programs in the project extreme portfolio has been designed by a multidisciplinary team of professionals to ensure maximum thera

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. To provide programs to enable the teens to reintegrate with their family and culture as outlined in the mission statement printed in schedule o..

    $1,934,860 spent$151,437 earned by the program
    100% of program spending
  2. Provide a residential facility known as the minnesota girls academy (mga) the minnesota girls academy is a residential treatment facility licensed by the stae of minnesotadepartment of human sercies. Mga assists girls ages 13 to 17 in overcoming the emotional or behavioral struggles that can keep them from living fulfilling lives and having healthy social and familial relationships. Mga is founded upon the belief that every girl is unique. Because each child possesses a distinct compilation of experiences, talents, relationships, and struggles, mga offers a treatment program that is customized to meet her special needs and help her become more confident, secure, and healthy. By combining the best features of a boarding school, a treatment facility, and a transition program, we are able to provide a safe and nurturing environment for our students, giving them the support and tools necessary to thrive. Mga exists in the heart of the quaint community of bricelyn, minnesota. Our location provides the perfect balance of safe and comfortable surroundings with active, involved community living. Mga is a warm and inviting program where girls are made to feel welcome, included, and…

The 2 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,934,860.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.6M) Expenses 100 ($1.6M) Net assets -2 ($-3618)2018 Revenue 100 ($1.6M) Expenses 91 ($1.4M) Net assets 100 ($168k)2019 Revenue 84 ($1.3M) Expenses 90 ($1.4M) Net assets 53 ($89k)2020 Revenue 99 ($1.6M) Expenses 92 ($1.4M) Net assets 127 ($214k)2021 Revenue 142 ($2.3M) Expenses 120 ($1.9M) Net assets 351 ($591k)2022 Revenue 116 ($1.9M) Expenses 129 ($2.0M) Net assets 249 ($418k)2023 Revenue 140 ($2.2M) Expenses 160 ($2.5M) Net assets 84 ($141k)2024 Revenue 121 ($1.9M) Expenses 142 ($2.2M) Net assets -103 ($-173251)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (121)Expenses (142)Net assets (-103)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $790k to $1.4M (+80%).

$670k
$543k
$491k
$790k
$1.4M
$1.3M
$972k
$486k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 1% · 2021 10%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

89% of CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (82% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,035 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$22k
’17
$172k
’18
−$80k
’19
$126k
’20
$376k
’21
−$172k
’22
−$277k
’23
−$315k
’24
0.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed33333343
Joined·+0+0+0+0+0+1+0
No longer listed·0000001
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 18 funders to 37 funders, grant income rose $303k → $496k.

14 of 101 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 42% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 101 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 27% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

71% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME.

27%
largest funder
52%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 41% · 2018 38% · 2019 27% · 2020 26% · 2021 22% · 2022 26% · 2023 32% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

47% of CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 52% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME draws 82% of its grant income from funders outside New York, across 13 states in all.

MN
IL
MI
NY
NV
IN
PA
NJ
CA
MD
DE
NC
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.4M arriving through sponsors registered in 9 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME's funding base is broadening — from 18 funders to 37 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−16% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.8mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)3% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,928 youth development nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 10%Fundraising 9%

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 2 states

IL
NY

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME?
CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME (New York) receives grants from 101 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,348,299 to it, the largest being BELLOWS FAMILY FOUNDATION ($893,500). 53 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME have?
IRS filings report 101 organizations giving $3,348,299 in grants to CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME, 53 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME?
BELLOWS FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $893,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 101 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing