Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Bellows Family Foundation

The foundation is exclusively organized to foster, promote, support, develop, encourage and maintain a specific charitable, educational, or religious purpose or function of, or as authorized in the charter of, the jewish federation of metropolitan chicago.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$151k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$2.2MYouth Development$1.0MEducation$598kHuman Services$333kInternational$295kPhilanthropy$279kHealth$207kRecreation & Sports$128kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 25 grants below total $1,066,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,098,755 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $32,755 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $119k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $894k
$12,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEBREW THEOLOGICAL COLLEGE$150,500
PROJECT EXTREME$150,000
YESHIVAT ASHREINU$125,000
AMIT CHILDREN INC$100,000
YESHIVA UNIVERSITY$100,000
ARIE CROWN HEBREW DAY SCHOOL$93,750
HILLEL TORAH NORTH SUBURBAN DAY SCHOOL$75,000
MANHATTAN JEWISH EXPERIENCE SYNAGOGUE$50,000
CAMP MOSHAVA OF WILD ROSE INC$50,000
FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC$23,750
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$18,000
ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD$15,000
CHICAGO CHESED FUND$12,500
THE ARK$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BIMAD ALON MOREH INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $469k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE ARK: $10k → 14%Friends of Refugees of Eastern Europe: $250k → 14%FRIENDS OF REFUGEES OF EASTERN EUROPE: $50k → 14%SoulUMadraigos Midwest: $36k → 14%SOULU DBA UPWARD COMMUNITY: $25k → 14%SoulUMadraigos Midwest: $25k → 14%SoulUMadraigos Midwest: $21k → 14%SoulUMadraigos Midwest: $12k → 14%SoulUMadraigos Midwest: $10k → 14%SOULU DBA UPWARD COMMUNITY: $8k → 14%LIBENU: $10k → 14%Chicago Chesed Fund Inc: $13k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
LA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.5M · 24 repeat orgs$513k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
11

Total granted

$4.5M
$197k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+21%

Still filing today

58%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $316k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthInternationalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME
    8× · 2017–2024 · $894k · revenue +21%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $430k · revenue +59%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF REFUGEES OF EASTERN EUROPE INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $300k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHICAGO MIKVAH ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $43k · revenue -13%
  • MV
    MISHPAT VEHALACHA BEYISRAEL
    one grant, 2017 · $38k · 74% of their budget
  • UC
    UPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $27k · revenue +39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
University of Judaism Foundation
3
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
4
Sherit Isroel
5
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

6
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
7
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
8
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
9
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
10
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
11
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

12
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kollel Torah Mitzion Inc and the most unlike its peers is Camp Extreme D/B/a Project Extreme. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%2%<5yr14%2%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr19%32%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr13%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr19%48%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr13%29%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/47
the rest of the field
13%
10,048/78,371

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/34
Grantees still filing
21/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Kehilat Chovevei Tzion — $491,654 · OtherKehilat Chovevei TzionHEBREW THEOLOGICAL COLLEGE — $341,167 · OtherHEBREW THEOLOGICAL COLLEGEIDA CROWN JEWISH ACADEMY INC — $295,300 · OtherIDA CROWN JEWISH ACADEMY INCARIE CROWN HEBREW DAY SCHOOL — $128,500 · OtherARIE CROWN HEBREW DAY SCHOOLMANHATTAN JEWISH EXPERIENCE SYNAGOGUE — $102,000 · OtherHILLEL TORAH NORTH SUBURBAN DAY SCHOOL — $81,000 · OtherYESHIVA UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · OtherKEHILLAH JEWISH EDUCATION FUND — $74,500 · OtherCAMP MOSHAVA OF WILD ROSE INC — $127,500 · OtherCAMP MOSHAVA OF WILD ROSE INC+13 more — $209,000 · Other+13 moreCAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME — $893,500 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP EXTREME D/B/A P…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC — $430,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS O…JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $210,700 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND…Yeshivat Ashreinu Inc — $125,000 · PhilanthropyYeshivat Ashreinu …JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $41,250 · Philanthropy+1 more — $14,500 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF REFUGEES OF EASTERN EUROPE INC — $300,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF…SOULU — $136,500 · Human ServicesSOULU+3 more — $32,500 · Human Services+3 moreKOLLEL TORAH MITZION INC — $326,643 · ReligionKOLLEL TO…CHICAGO MIKVAH ASSOCIATION INC — $42,500 · ReligionCHICAGO M…HILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC — $20,000 · ReligionMIDRASH FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · ReligionISRALIGHT SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $19,000 · Religion+2 more — $17,500 · ReligionONE ISRAEL FUND LTD — $149,600 · InternationalAMIT CHILDREN INC — $115,036 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC — $10,000 · InternationalCHAI LIFELINE INC — $150,800 · HealthUPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES — $26,750 · HealthFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC — $23,750 · Health+1 more — $5,500 · Health
Other$1,950,621Youth Development$893,500Philanthropy$821,450Human Services$469,000Religion$445,643International$274,636Health$206,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME — $893,500 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC — $430,000 over 7y, 8.7% of budgetKOLLEL TORAH MITZION INC — $326,643 over 7y, 7.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF REFUGEES OF EASTERN EUROPE INC — $300,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $210,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC — $150,800 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetONE ISRAEL FUND LTD — $149,600 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSOULU — $136,500 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetCAMP MOSHAVA OF WILD ROSE INC — $127,500 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetAMIT CHILDREN INC — $115,036 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEHILLAH JEWISH EDUCATION FUND — $74,500 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetCHICAGO MIKVAH ASSOCIATION INC — $42,500 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $41,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISHPAT VEHALACHA BEYISRAEL — $37,500 over 1y, 74% of budgetUPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES — $26,750 over 1y, 24% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC — $23,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BIMAD ALON MOREH INC — $20,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetMIDRASH FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetISRALIGHT SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $19,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY FUND INC — $14,500 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetCHICAGO CHESED FUND — $13,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HAKOTEL INC — $11,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIBENU — $9,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHATZALAH OF THE ROCKAWAYS & NASSAU COUNTY INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS-YAD YESHAYA INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHATZALAH CHICAGO — $5,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC
  • Who funds KOLLEL TORAH MITZION INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF REFUGEES OF EASTERN EUROPE INC
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC
  • Who funds ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD
  • Who funds SOULU
  • Who funds CAMP MOSHAVA OF WILD ROSE INC
  • Who funds Yeshivat Ashreinu Inc
  • Who funds AMIT CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds KEHILLAH JEWISH EDUCATION FUND
  • Who funds CHICAGO MIKVAH ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
  • Who funds MISHPAT VEHALACHA BEYISRAEL
  • Who funds UPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC
  • Who funds HILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BIMAD ALON MOREH INC
  • Who funds MIDRASH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ISRALIGHT SOUTH FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY FUND INC
  • Who funds CHICAGO CHESED FUND
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HAKOTEL INC
  • Who funds Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel
  • Who funds THE ARK
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL51.7× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Bitton Family Foundation Inc · Aj & Sl Stern Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Walder Foundation · Todd a and Raphaela Stern Family Foundation · Noah Wolff Family Foundation Inc · Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago · The Novick Family Foundation · Elliott and Ronni Charitable Fdn · Dennis and Joyce Ruben Foundation · Sheldon and Freda Robinson Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bellows Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bellows Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bellows Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph