How much did MACHON BY CHARITABLE TRUST grant in FY2024?

MACHON BY CHARITABLE TRUST reported 29 grants totaling $1,249,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is MACHON BY CHARITABLE TRUST based?

MACHON BY CHARITABLE TRUST is based in NY.

MACHON BY CHARITABLE TRUST

Foundation Dossiers

· Charitable trust

MACHON BY CHARITABLE TRUST

To carry on charitable, religious, scientific, literary or educational activities and to otherwise help people in need, either directly or via contributions to other tax exempt organizations that conduct similar support activities.

$1.2M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$150k

Largest

01What you fund

01FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $7k
$10k–50k21 grants · $566k
$50k–250k7 grants · $625k

$36,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.5M

Total assets

Largest grants

TIFERETH SHMUEL$150,000
CHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION$100,000
TAL ACADEMY$100,000
BNOT CHAYA ACADEMY$100,000
TAFKID$75,000
MANHATTAN HIGH SCHOOL$50,000
BONIM LAMOKOM$50,000
ZICHRON SHOLOM REFAL$38,000
LEV WITH LOVE$36,000
HATZOLAH FLATBUSH$36,000
MENUCHA SERVICES$36,000
CONGRAGATION EZER YEHUDA$36,000
MACHANANYIM$36,000
YESHIVA SHAAREI ZION$36,000
BNEI AHARON$36,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel

Philanthropy

Birchas Yaakov Inc

Operation of an educational institution, providing post-secondary rabbinical education.

Religion

Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi

Philanthropy

Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc

Education

Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education

Yeshiva of Los Angeles Girls High School

The organization is an accredited high school with a complete curriculum. general and judaic studies are emphasized.

—

Yanivs Shabbat

Shabat Dinner for those who need foods on friday night it is religious for Jewish people

Religion

Ahavat Yisrael Inc

Philanthropy

Yeshiva Birkat Israel Inc

Education services

Religion

Yeshivas Abirey Lev

Provide education for college age students

Religion

Bais Menachem Youth Development Program

Combating juvenille delinquency in jewish troubled youth

Crime & Legal

Bais Medrash Lmorim

To spread Jewish Education

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fresh Start Center and the most unlike its peers is Camp Extreme. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 14% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%1/29

the rest of the field

5,613/60,780

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/17

Grantees still filing

16/17

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$504,000Religion$275,000Education$218,000Human Services$90,000Health$71,000Youth Development$25,000International$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY40.6× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Fjc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · United Jewish Appeal-Federation Of · Cross River Community Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MACHON BY CHARITABLE TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TAL ACADEMY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 2 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.2× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 881917189 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on TAL ACADEMY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Machon by Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Machon by Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MACHON BY CHARITABLE TRUST

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Machon by Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph

MACHON BY CHARITABLE TRUST

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Machon by Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph