· Private foundation
The Jmg Foundation
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k155 grants · $285k
- $10k–50k40 grants · $842k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+2 grants · $722k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Cong Torah Shlaima Inc | $461,775 |
| Torah Center for Higher Rabbinical Studies | $260,000 |
| Yeshiva Ohavei Torah | $220,000 |
| Darchei Israel | $195,300 |
| Torat Hayim Hebrew Academy | $145,000 |
| Sephardic Heritage Center | $100,000 |
| Kollel International Inc | $91,250 |
| Community Spa Mikveh | $80,000 |
| Bnei Yerushlayim | $75,000 |
| YRSRH | $65,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $57,950 |
| Gesher Inc | $57,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $55,000 |
| Netan Eli Hebrew Academy | $51,000 |
| Yeshiva Ohr Chanoch | $41,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.
455 repeat relationships — 114 still active in FY2023, 341 since wound down; 94 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $765k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTorah Center For Higher Rabbinical Studies Inc4× · 2017–2023 · $760k · revenue +408%
- CECAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME6× · 2017–2023 · $309k · revenue +21%
- BSBMG STUDENT AID FUND7× · 2017–2023 · $167k · revenue +114%
Funded once
- URURBAN REVITALIZATION COALITIONone grant, 2018 · $255k
- YYouthprisegraduatedone grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +70%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $31k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Teaching
Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.
Award grants to promote torah study
Religious School
Support of religious schools in Israel
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Jerusalem Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Keren Torah Vchesed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
233 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 233 of the 1,347 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Torah Center For Higher Rabbinical Studies Inc ↗
- Who funds CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME ↗
- Who funds BEIT MEDRASH OF GREAT NECK INC ↗
- Who funds Ohr HaTorah ↗
- Who funds BMG STUDENT AID FUND ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC ↗
- Who funds Denan Family Foundation ↗
- Who funds Youthprise ↗
- Who funds BAIS YAAKOV MACHON ORA A NJ NON- PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · The Setton Foundation · Chehebar Family Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Foop Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Jmg Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc — 28% of income from government
- Heichal Hatorah — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.