Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Zufall Family Foundation Kathryn a Zufall Md

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0161% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20182025.

Education$66kArts & Culture$49kHealth$13kEnvironment$6kCommunity Improvement$5kHuman Services$3kYouth Development$2kFood & Nutrition$2kPhilanthropy$500Other$92k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$556k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$8,000
AMERICAN STRING TEACHERS ASSOCIATION$6,000
LADIES MUSIC CLUB$2,000
BROADWAY CARES$1,500
BASHA KILL AREA ASSOCIATION$1,000
THALIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$1,000
ARTIST ARCHIVES OF THE WESTERN RESERVE$1,000
SULLIVAN 180$1,000
KUOW$1,000
LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF SULLIVAN COUNTY$1,000
SEATTLE CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY$1,000
RIDGETOP LAKES CONSERVANCY$1,000
RECOVERY CAFE$1,000
MUSIC CENTER OF THE NORTHWEST$1,000
DOCTORS CARE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPELINK: $1k → 9%HOPELINK: $1k → 9%HOPELINK: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$221k · 29 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
7

Total granted

$221k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+58%

Still filing today

86%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    8× · 2018–2025 · $60k · revenue +40%
  • BC
    BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $12k · revenue +12%
  • PN
    Philharmonia Northwest
    7× · 2018–2024 · $10k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • SA
    ST ANTHONY HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • TP
    TABERNACLE PRODUCTIONS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue -43%
  • TB
    THE BAROQUE ORCHESTRA OF NEW JERSEY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +73%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle Chamber Orchestra

Gather diverse and talented musicians, professionals and amateurs, to curate and perform orchestral repertoire that uplifts, inspires, and celebrates live performances, as well as offer educational activities concerning music.

Arts & Culture
2
Pacific Northwest Music Project
Arts & Culture
3
Orchestra Seattle - Seattle Chamber Singer

The mission of Orchestra Seattle | Seattle Chamber Singers is to enrich the quality of life in the Pacific Northwest through performance of great orchestral and choral literature; to introduce Northwest audiences to rarely heard works of…

4
Roanoke Symphony Orchestra

The Roanoke Symphony Orchestra provides a professional symphony orchestra of artistic excellence and integrity to enrich lives, to educate, and to entertain diverse audiences in western Virginia with the highest quality instrumental and…

Arts & Culture
5
Olympia Symphony Orchestra

To provide the highest quality live music to enrich educate and entertain an expanding audience.

6
Seattle Artists

Musical and other cultural performances and music education for youth

7
Auburn Symphony Association

Produce classical music concerts and educational activities related to classical music

Arts & Culture
8
Seattle Pro Musica

Enrich and inspire our audiences, singers and community through the experience of choral artistry, and to increase access to and appreciationn of choral music

9
San Jose Chamber Orchestra

The mission of the San Jose Chamber Orchestra (SJCO) is to share exciting, though-provoking, and vibrant Music by contemporary and time-honored composers reflecting the cultural diversity of our everchanging community, and to support and…

Unclassified
10
Seattle Metropolitan Chamber Orchestra

The Seattle Metropolitan Chamber Orchestra crafts performances that tell the story of the human experience in new ways, providing musical arts education and fulfillment to people of all walks of life. SMCO features music by composers of…

Arts & Culture
11
Yakima Symphony Orchestra

Yakima Symphony Orchestra is a regional nonprofit organization that offers its audiences high quality symphonic and other music. It brings to the Central Washington Community stimulating, entertaining and educational activities related to…

Arts & Culture
12
Concerto Soloists Chamber Orchestra of Philadelphia

To be a sustainable musical institution that brings the intimate experience of a world-class chamber orchestra performance to the greater philadelphia area,enriching the musical life of the city and region by the integrity and excellence…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ladies Musical Club of Seattle and the most unlike its peers is Literacy Volunteers of Sullivan Cou. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Community Arts OrganizationsSubstance Abuse TreatmentElementary Literacy TutoringGovernment Accountability R…Cancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Health CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Public University Foundatio…Land Conservation Organizat…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Food Pantries & AssistanceClassical Music Ensembles
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%34%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,531

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN STRING TEACHERS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATEDNJ — $44,000 · OtherAMERICAN STRING TEACHERS ASSOCIATION INCORPOR…BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC — $11,500 · OtherBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INCMusic Center of the Northwest — $6,500 · OtherMusic Center of the NorthwestBASHA KILL AREA ASSOCIATION INC — $6,000 · OtherBASHA KILL AREA ASSOCIATION INCST ANTHONY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherMT TABOR HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $4,500 · OtherPROJECT KESHO — $4,000 · Other+9 more — $14,000 · Other+9 moreUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $60,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF SULLIVAN COU — $5,000 · EducationLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF SULLIVAN…+1 more — $1,000 · EducationPhilharmonia Northwest — $10,000 · Arts & CulturePhilharmonia NorthwestLADIES MUSICAL CLUB OF SEATTLE — $9,000 · Arts & CultureLADIES MUSICAL CLUB OF …ARTISTS ARCHIVES OF THE WESTERN RES — $7,000 · Arts & CultureARTISTS ARCHIVES OF THE…Orcas Island Chamber Music Festival — $6,000 · Arts & CultureOrcas Island Chamber Mu…Seattle Chamber Music Festival — $4,000 · Arts & CultureSeattle Chamber Music F…TABERNACLE PRODUCTIONS INC — $4,000 · Arts & CultureTABERNACLE PRODUCTIONS …THALIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $3,000 · Arts & CultureTHALIA SYMPHONY ORCHEST…KUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO — $2,000 · Arts & CultureLITTLE MOZART FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $2,000 · Arts & CultureDOCTORS CARE — $7,000 · HealthRECOVERY CAFE — $3,500 · HealthCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE — $2,000 · HealthRIDGETOP LAKES CONSERVANCY INC — $5,000 · EnvironmentPASSAIC RIVER COALITION INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentSullivan 180 Inc — $4,000 · Community ImprovementFAMILYWORKS — $1,000 · Community ImprovementHOPELINK — $2,500 · Human Services
Other$95,500Education$66,000Arts & Culture$49,000Health$12,500Environment$6,000Community Improvement$5,000Human Services$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $60,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN STRING TEACHERS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATEDNJ — $44,000 over 8y, 72% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC — $11,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPhilharmonia Northwest — $10,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetLADIES MUSICAL CLUB OF SEATTLE — $9,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetARTISTS ARCHIVES OF THE WESTERN RES — $7,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetDOCTORS CARE — $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMusic Center of the Northwest — $6,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBASHA KILL AREA ASSOCIATION INC — $6,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetOrcas Island Chamber Music Festival — $6,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF SULLIVAN COU — $5,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetRIDGETOP LAKES CONSERVANCY INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetSeattle Chamber Music Festival — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTABERNACLE PRODUCTIONS INC — $4,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSullivan 180 Inc — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRECOVERY CAFE — $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WHARTON INSTITUTE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHALIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $3,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetHOPELINK — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMaris Place — $1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPASSAIC RIVER COALITION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILYWORKS — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fales Foundation TrustMN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fales Foundation Trust · Seattle Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Artsfund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Zufall Family Foundation Kathryn a Zufall Md funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph