· Private foundation
Fales Foundation Trust
Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2026.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k45 grants · $205k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $66k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FAMILY WORKS | $65,500 |
| MARYS PLACE | $10,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON | $10,000 |
| YWCA SEATTLEKINGSNOHOMISH | $10,000 |
| YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE | $10,000 |
| CONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS | $10,000 |
| COYOTE CENTRAL | $8,000 |
| SEATTLE EDUCATION ACCESS | $7,500 |
| PEDIATRIC INTERIM CARE CENTER INC | $5,000 |
| SEATTLE HUMANE | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| WEST SEATTLE FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| TEENTIX | $5,000 |
| IMAGINE HOUSING | $5,000 |
| SOLID GROUND | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
34 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $109k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFAMILYWORKS3× · 2021–2023 · $74k · revenue +178%
- MPMaris Place2× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +42%
- NBNEW BEGINNINGS3× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- FLFOOD LIFELINEone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +2%
- YSYWCA SEATTLEone grant, 2021 · $10k
- BOBREAD OF LIFE MISSIONone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…
We Heart Seattle is an action-based, boots-on-the-ground movement that organizes trash cleanups in our public spaces and offers resources to those in need. Through our direct civic engagement we lead the way to a more compassionate and…
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…
Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.
Transitions works to end poverty and homelessness for women and children in Spokane, Washington.
Housing Counseling Services
KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…
LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.
RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.
SWYFS partners with youth and families to transform their futures.
DESC helps people with the complex needs of homelessness, substance use disorders, and serious mental illness achieve their highest potential for health and well-being through comprehensive services, treatment, and housing.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Harvest Emm and the most unlike its peers is Teentix. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
119 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 119 of the 141 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILYWORKS ↗
- Who funds COYOTE CENTRAL ↗
- Who funds Maris Place ↗
- Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS ↗
- Who funds Solid Ground Washington ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds Hunger Intervention Program ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE REPERTORY THEATRE ↗
- Who funds Pongo Publishing Inc ↗
- Who funds PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds VINE MAPLE PLACE ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) ↗
- Who funds PIONEER HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH IN FOCUS ↗
- Who funds FOOD LIFELINE ↗
- Who funds STREET YOUTH MINITRIES ↗
- Who funds Elizabeth Home ↗
- Who funds LAKE CITY PARTNERS ENDING HOMELESSNESS ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds BREAD OF LIFE MISSION ↗
- Who funds OPERATION NIGHTWATCH INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS CONNECTIONS ↗
- Who funds RICHARD HUGO HOUSE ↗
- Who funds ROOTS YOUNG ADULT SHELTER ↗
- Who funds Community Roots Housing Foundation ↗
- Who funds Refugee Womens Alliance ↗
- Who funds TEENTIX ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST EDUCATION ACCESS ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds YOUR MONEY MATTERS ↗
- Who funds LOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Medina Foundation · United Way of King County · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Garneau Nicon Family Foundation · Kawabe Memorial Fund · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Washington Federal Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fales Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.