Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zoetis Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11M
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$3.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$7.6MAnimals$5.5MPublic Safety & Disaster$3.4MFood & Nutrition$3.3MHealth$1.8MInternational$1.6MPhilanthropy$1.5MEnvironment$600kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+16 grants · $9.7M
$250,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$3,000,000
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF VETERINARY MEDICAL COLLEGES$1,875,000
FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC$600,000
AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC$482,221
AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION$400,000
NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$400,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY$383,372
FARM JOURNAL FOUNDATION$350,000
GIVE2ASIA$316,350
Individual grant recipient$300,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$300,000
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$299,900
GIVE2ASIA$277,500
NATIONAL FFA FOUNDATION INC$250,000
NOT ONE MORE VET INC$250,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 89% of grant dollars ($23M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($3.0M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $4.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE AAEP FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 15%THE AAEP FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 15%THE AAEP FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 15%THE AAEP FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 15%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $3.0M → 14%FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $600k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $600k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $244k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $122k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
IA
IN
OH
CA
KY
VA
DE
KS
DC
GA
FL

Beyond the US: 11% of all-years giving ($3.0M)

7 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Brazil$831k · 5 grants
Nigeria$446k · 3 grants
Uganda$440k · 3 grants
United Kingdom$425k · 3 grants
Canada$423k · 3 grants
Australia$229k · 2 grants
Belgium$160k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Zoetis Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Zoetis Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 23% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$22M · 22 repeat orgs$889k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
3

Total granted

$22M
$279k

Still filing today

68%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $610k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF VETERINARY MEDICAL COLLEGES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $6.7M · revenue +34% · 27% of their budget
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3.4M · revenue +23%
  • NF
    NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW
    one grant, 2022 · $125k
  • WS
    WORLD SMALL ANIMAL VETERINARY ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $123k
  • UE
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA
    one grant, 2022 · $31k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine

The mission of the american college of veterinary internal medicine (acvim) is to enhance animal and human health by advancing veterinary internal medicine through training, education, an discovery. the acvim is the american certifying…

—
2
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
3
Student Chapter American Veterinary Medical Assoc

Tufts SAVMA is the Tufts Student Chapter

—
4
American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Foundation

The mission of the acvim foundation is to eliminate animal and human disease by supporting discovery, education, and partnerships throughout the global community of medicine.

—
5
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
6
Texas Veterinary Medical Foundation

The texas veterinary medical foundation is committed to supporting the veterinary profession and our communities in texas by providing resources, education, and programs for the responsible stewardship of animals.

Animals
7
Animal Cancer Foundation

Animal cancer foundation is dedicated to finding new treatments and eventual cures for cancer by funding research in and increasing public awareness of comparative oncology, the study of naturally occurring, similar cancers in people and…

Health
8
Veterinary Medical Association Executives

The mission of the veterinary medical association executives is to help veterinary medical association executives create thriving organizations and provide effective leadership within the veterinary profession.

Community Improvement
9
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
10
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
11
American College of Veterinary Pathologists Inc

The mission of the american college of veterinary pathologists is to promote excellence in veterinary pathology through our members as they protect and improve animal, human, and environmental health to benefit society.

Animals
12
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation

The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Association of Veterinary Medical Colleges; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF VETERINARY MEDICAL COLLEGES: $6,652,500 · EducationAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF VETERINA…KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $594,322 · EducationKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATI…AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF BOVINE PRACTITIONERS FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 · EducationFARM JOURNAL FOUNDATION: $950,000 · OtherFARM JOURNAL FOUNDATIO…Individual grant recipient: $800,000 · OtherIndividual grant recip…THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $600,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYSHANTI PROJECT: $543,000 · OtherSHANTI PROJECTLIVESTOCK INDUSTRY FOUNDATION FOR AFRICA: $445,762 · OtherLIVESTOCK INDUSTRY FOU…UGANDA CRANE CREAMERIES COOPERATIVE UNION LTD: $439,989 · OtherUGANDA CRANE CREAMERIE…VETLIFE: $300,000 · OtherVETLIFEIndividual grant recipient: $300,000 · OtherIndividual grant recip…THE AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY ASSOCIATION LTD: $229,234 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF SWINE VETERINARIANS FOUNDATION: $228,750 · Other+4 more: $439,040 · Other+4 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,371,291 · Human ServicesAmerican National Re…FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $1,200,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD…THE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE FKA THE AAEP FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $1,200,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL FISH …AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $1,100,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN VETER…Wildlife Conservation Society: $550,116 · AnimalsWildlife Conse…HUMAN ANIMAL BOND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $300,000 · AnimalsHUMAN ANIMAL B…DEVELOPING VETERINARY MEDICINE CAREERS: $250,000 · AnimalsDEVELOPING VET…GIVE2ASIA: $1,384,846 · InternationalVETERINARIANS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $200,000 · InternationalDR VERNARD HODGES IT TAKES A VILLAGE CHARITY FOUNDATION: $850,500 · Youth DevelopmentNational FFA Foundation Inc: $700,000 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,493,484 · PhilanthropyNOT ONE MORE VET INC: $510,716 · Health
Education$7,546,822Other$5,275,775Human Services$4,821,291Animals$3,400,116International$1,584,846Youth Development$1,550,500Philanthropy$1,493,484Health$510,716

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF VETERINARY MEDICAL COLLEGES: $6,652,500 over 4y, 27% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,371,291 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,493,484 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE2ASIA: $1,384,846 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetNATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $1,200,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $1,200,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $1,100,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetDR VERNARD HODGES IT TAKES A VILLAGE CHARITY FOUNDATION: $850,500 over 2y, 81% of budgetNational FFA Foundation Inc: $700,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $600,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $594,322 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $550,116 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHANTI PROJECT: $543,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetNOT ONE MORE VET INC: $510,716 over 2y, 19% of budgetHUMAN ANIMAL BOND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF BOVINE PRACTITIONERS FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetDEVELOPING VETERINARY MEDICINE CAREERS: $250,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE FKA THE AAEP FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF SWINE VETERINARIANS FOUNDATION: $228,750 over 3y, 25% of budgetVETERINARIANS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $200,000 over 1y, 48% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cencora Impact FoundationPA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cencora Impact Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zoetis Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zoetis Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Zoetis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph