Loading…
Loading…
Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit
HUMAN ANIMAL BOND RESEARCH FOUNDATION (Washington, D.C.) is funded by 13 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $3,107,900 in grants to it, the largest being PETSMART CHARITIES INC ($807,900). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
HUMAN ANIMAL BOND RESEARCH FOUNDATION is better cushioned than half of the 1,477 animals nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,477 animals nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
99% of HUMAN ANIMAL BOND RESEARCH FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (74% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $75k → $135k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
From the IRS filings of HUMAN ANIMAL BOND RESEARCH FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
HUMAN ANIMAL BOND RESEARCH FOUNDATION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 26% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 33% · 2018 40% · 2019 50% · 2020 31% · 2021 37% · 2022 23% · 2023 18% · 2024 18% · 2025 74% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
70% of HUMAN ANIMAL BOND RESEARCH FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 77% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
HUMAN ANIMAL BOND RESEARCH FOUNDATION draws 92% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C. — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 10 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 13 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
89% of spending goes to programs.
56%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 36 states
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 13funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing