· Private foundation
Zoetis Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.5M
- $250k+16 grants · $9.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS | $3,000,000 |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF VETERINARY MEDICAL COLLEGES | $1,875,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC | $600,000 |
| AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC | $482,221 |
| NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION | $400,000 |
| AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION | $400,000 |
| WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY | $383,372 |
| FARM JOURNAL FOUNDATION | $350,000 |
| GIVE2ASIA | $316,350 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $300,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $300,000 |
| KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $299,900 |
| GIVE2ASIA | $277,500 |
| NOT ONE MORE VET INC | $250,000 |
| DIVERSIFY VETERINARY MEDICINE COALITION | $250,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 89% of grant dollars ($23M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($3.0M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $4.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 11% of all-years giving ($3.0M)
7 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 10% of Zoetis Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
22 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $610k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AAAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF VETERINARY MEDICAL COLLEGES4× · 2021–2024 · $6.7M · revenue +34% · 27% of their budget
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches3× · 2022–2024 · $3.4M · revenue +23%
- NFNATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +22%
Funded once
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOWone grant, 2022 · $125k
- WSWORLD SMALL ANIMAL VETERINARY ASSOCIATION FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $123k
- UEUNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTAone grant, 2022 · $31k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the american college of veterinary internal medicine (acvim) is to enhance animal and human health by advancing veterinary internal medicine through training, education, an discovery. the acvim is the american certifying…
Tufts SAVMA is the Tufts Student Chapter
The mission of the acvim foundation is to eliminate animal and human disease by supporting discovery, education, and partnerships throughout the global community of medicine.
Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…
The texas veterinary medical foundation is committed to supporting the veterinary profession and our communities in texas by providing resources, education, and programs for the responsible stewardship of animals.
Animal cancer foundation is dedicated to finding new treatments and eventual cures for cancer by funding research in and increasing public awareness of comparative oncology, the study of naturally occurring, similar cancers in people and…
The mission of the veterinary medical association executives is to help veterinary medical association executives create thriving organizations and provide effective leadership within the veterinary profession.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.
The mission of the american college of veterinary pathologists is to promote excellence in veterinary pathology through our members as they protect and improve animal, human, and environmental health to benefit society.
The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Association of Veterinary Medical Colleges and the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF VETERINARY MEDICAL COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GIVE2ASIA ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DR VERNARD HODGES IT TAKES A VILLAGE CHARITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds National FFA Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds SHANTI PROJECT ↗
- Who funds NOT ONE MORE VET INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN ANIMAL BOND RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF BOVINE PRACTITIONERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE FKA THE AAEP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPING VETERINARY MEDICINE CAREERS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF SWINE VETERINARIANS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VETERINARIANS WITHOUT BORDERS USA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cencora Impact Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Zoetis Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.