Skip to content
YWCA USA Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

YWCA USA Inc

Ywca usa is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
25
States reached
$139k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$16MEmployment$4.6MYouth Development$977kCommunity Improvement$762kCivil Rights$612kEducation$594kHousing & Shelter$135kCrime & Legal$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 41 grants below total $1,835,411, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,137,973 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $302,562 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $707k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.1M
$40,000
Median grant
25
States reached
$76M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YWCA NORTHWEST INDIANA$138,841
YWCA SOUTH FLORIDA$115,000
YWCA NORTHERN NEW JERSEY$115,000
YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$97,000
YWCA GLENDALE$95,000
YWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA$80,000
YWCA KITSAP COUNTY$80,000
YWCA GREATER ATLANTA$75,000
YWCA METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS$75,000
YWCA EL PASO DEL NORTE REGION$75,000
YWCA CENTRAL INDIANA$64,285
YWCA OF NEW YORK STATE (YWCA YWCA ROCHESTER & MONROE COUNTY)$60,000
YWCA GREATER LAFAYETTE$51,785
YWCA NORTHEAST TENNESSEE AND SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA$47,000
YWCA MCLEAN COUNTY$45,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $14.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YWCA DELAWARE: $99k → 10%YWCA WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS: $105k → 17%YWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $92k → 7%YWCA ALLENTOWN: $85k → 11%YWCA GOLDEN GATE SILICON VALLEY: $90k → 8%YWCA BERKELEYOAKLAND: $171k → 10%YWCA SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $100k → 11%YWCA HOUSTON: $179k → 16%YWCA EL PASO DEL NORTE REGION: $75k → 21%YWCA CENTRAL ALABAMA: $180k → 16%YWCA MADISON: $308k → 10%YWCA NORTHEAST TENNESSEE AND SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA: $100k → 15%YWCA GREATER ATLANTA: $85k → 13%YWCA NORTHEAST INDIANA: $462k → 12%YWCA NORTHWEST INDIANA: $169k → 15%YWCA EVANSVILLE: $461k → 15%YWCA GREATER LAFAYETTE: $408k → 19%YWCA MCLEAN COUNTY: $480k → 11%YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $97k → 14%YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $80k → 15%YWCA DELAWARE: $80k → 10%YWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $81k → 7%YWCA ALLENTOWN: $80k → 11%YWCA BERKELEYOAKLAND: $145k → 10%YWCA HOUSTON: $163k → 16%YWCA EL PASO DEL NORTE REGION: $75k → 21%YWCA SOUTH FLORIDA: $200k → 15%YWCA MADISON: $307k → 10%YWCA GREATER ATLANTA: $75k → 13%YWCA NORTHWEST INDIANA: $154k → 15%YWCA MCLEAN COUNTY: $200k → 11%YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $79k → 15%YWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $80k → 7%YWCA BERKELEYOAKLAND: $124k → 10%YWCA HOUSTON: $161k → 16%YWCA SOUTH FLORIDA: $171k → 15%YWCA MADISON: $189k → 10%YWCA GREATER ATLANTA: $71k → 13%YWCA NORTHWEST INDIANA: $139k → 15%YWCA MCLEAN COUNTY: $189k → 11%YWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $75k → 7%YWCA SOUTH FLORIDA: $119k → 15%YWCA MCLEAN COUNTY: $80k → 11%YWCA SOUTH FLORIDA: $115k → 15%YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $178k → 14%YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $131k → 14%YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $116k → 14%YWCA GREATER LOS ANGELES: $95k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$22M · 148 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

148 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2025, 110 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

148
63

Total granted

$22M
$928k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+11%

Still filing today

98%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $224k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YWCA MCLEAN COUNTY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +63%
  • YM
    YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    7× · 2018–2025 · $669k · revenue +127%
  • YS
    YWCA SOUTH FLORIDA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $667k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • TY
    THE YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION THE CITY OF NEW YORK
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +10%
  • YWCA CLARK COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $55k · revenue +44%
  • YMCA of Metropolitan Detroit
    one grant, 2022 · $55k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Women's Christian Association of Aurora Illinois

Ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

—
2
Young Womens Christian Association of Binghamton and Broome County

The organization's mission is to empower women and girls and to eliinate racism.

—
3
Young Women's Christian Association of Walla Walla

The ywca's mission is to eliminate racism and to empower women. our goal is to enrich the lives of women and their families. our programs and services must all work towards these ends.

Human Services
4
Young Women's Christian Association of Orange County Inc

To create opportunities for womens growth, leadership, and power in order to obtain a common vision: peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all people.

—
5
Ywca of Greater Johnstown

Ywca greater johnstown is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

—
6
Young Women's Christian Association of Hazleton Pa

The ywca of hazleton is a charitable, community service organization dedicated to the creation of opportunities for women's growth and leadership in order to attain a common vision: peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all people. we…

—
7
Young Women's Christian Association of Warren Ohio

The ywca of warren is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

—
8
Young Women's Christian Association of Gettysburg and Adams County

The ywca of gettysburg & adams county is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all. the ywca is adams county's center for personal and community growth - a place to learn,…

—
9
Young Womens Christian Association

To create opportunities for women's group leadership and power in order to attain a common vision of peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all people.

—
10
Ywca Housing Corporation

To encourage the development and operation of affordable residential real estate in downtown columbus for women with limited income and own and/or operate affordable residential real estate in downtown columbus for women with limited…

—
11
Young Women's Resource Center

To empower participants to be strong, self-confident, and resilient. the ywrc serves girls and young women ages 10-24 with groups and individual support, resources, and other services that develop their emotional, mental, physical, and…

Human Services
12
Young Womens Christian Association

Empowering women

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Women's Christian Association of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County; the most unlike its peers is Hanover Area Ymca. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

199 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 199 of the 214 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
41
Early backer (in before they grew)
197/199
Grantees still filing
119/199
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YWCA MCLEAN COUNTY: $1,013,771 · Human ServicesYWCA MCLEAN COUNTYYWCA MADISON INC: $804,579 · Human ServicesYWCA MADISON INCYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $669,100 · Human ServicesYWCA SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $667,183 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $590,967 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area: $502,750 · Human Services+111 more: $10,770,806 · Human Services+111 moreYWCA NORTH CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $1,053,027 · OtherYWCA NORTH CENTRAL INDIANA INCYWCA OF THE QUAD CITIES: $430,850 · OtherYWCA OF THE QUAD CITIESYWCA NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $429,850 · OtherYWCA NORTHERN NEW JERSEYYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO: $335,643 · OtherYWCA OF GLENDALE AND PASADENA: $290,000 · OtherYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $287,850 · OtherYWCA EvanstonNorth Shore: $277,183 · OtherYWCA Dayton: $276,350 · OtherYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE HARBOR AREA: $267,850 · OtherYWCA HARTFORD REGION INC: $263,850 · Other+68 more: $3,846,040 · Other+68 moreYWCA GLA URBAN CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT CORP: $197,000 · Youth DevelopmentYWCA OF KALAMAZOO NONPROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION: $105,000 · Housing & ShelterYWCA CASS CLAY: $80,000 · Housing & ShelterYWCAs of New York State Inc: $60,000 · Civil RightsYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER PENNSYLVANIA: $20,000 · Environment
Human Services$15,019,156Other$7,758,493Youth Development$197,000Housing & Shelter$185,000Civil Rights$60,000Environment$20,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYWCA NORTH CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $1,053,027 over 5y, 17% of budgetYWCA MCLEAN COUNTY: $1,013,771 over 6y, 13% of budgetYWCA MADISON INC: $804,579 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $669,100 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetYWCA SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $667,183 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $590,967 over 6y, 19% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area: $502,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $474,645 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetYWCA OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA INC: $473,857 over 2y, 26% of budgetUniversity YWCA Berkeley California: $455,083 over 4y, 18% of budgetYWCA OF THE QUAD CITIES: $430,850 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetYWCA NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $429,850 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetYWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $394,833 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetYWCA USA INC: $357,349 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO: $335,643 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetYWCA NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA: $322,000 over 7y, 15% of budgetYWCA GOLDEN GATE SILICON VALLEY: $303,250 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $298,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM: $292,850 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetYWCA OF GLENDALE AND PASADENA: $290,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $287,850 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetYWCA DELAWARE INC: $285,850 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetYWCA EvanstonNorth Shore: $277,183 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetYWCA Dayton: $276,350 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ATLANTA: $276,333 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION NORTHEAST TN AND SOUTHWEST VA: $269,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE HARBOR AREA: $267,850 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetYWCA HARTFORD REGION INC: $263,850 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF KAUAI: $249,183 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetYWCA OF GREATER CHARLESTON: $238,250 over 5y, 8.0% of budgetYWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $228,850 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION EL PASO DEL NORTE REGION: $216,850 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA of the Lower Cape Fear Inc: $214,850 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetYoung Women's Christian Association of Greater Austin: $204,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetYWCA ALLENTOWN: $200,183 over 3y, 18% of budgetYWCA GLA URBAN CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT CORP: $197,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $190,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY: $182,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetYWCA OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA: $179,500 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetYWCA RHODE ISLAND: $173,850 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetYWCA OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $167,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI: $165,850 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetYWCA Central Maine: $165,850 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $160,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LUBBOCK: $159,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $155,850 over 3y, 30% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $155,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetYWCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC: $135,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mary Kay Ash Foundati…American Association …Cicatelli Associates …More Than a Phone IncWomen's Foundation of…Otto Bremer TrustPnc FoundationThe Gap FoundationRespect TogetherUnited Animal Nations…Dollar General Litera…Pennsylvania Coalitio…
Mary Kay Ash FoundationTX44.3× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mary Kay Ash Foundation · American Association of University Women Inc · Cicatelli Associates Inc · More Than a Phone Inc · Women's Foundation of California · Otto Bremer Trust · Pnc Foundation · The Gap Foundation · Respect Together · United Animal Nations Dba Redrover · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization YWCA USA Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from YWCA USA Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Ywca of Palm Beach County: 72% of income from government
  • Young Women's Christian Association of L: 53% of income from government
  • Ywca Delaware Inc: 50% of income from government
  • Ywca Northern New Jersey: 42% of income from government
  • Ywca of Southeastern Massachusetts Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Ywca of Greater Portland: 15% of income from government
  • Ywca of Eastern Union County Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Ywca Hartford Region Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Ywca Northeastern Massachusetts Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Ywca Tulsa Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Cambridge Young Women's Christian Association: 3% of income from government
  • Ywca of Vermont Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Ywca South Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
119report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 214 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on YWCA USA’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home