Skip to content

Illinois · Nonprofit

YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY

YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY (Illinois) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $10,925,855 to it, the largest being ILLINOIS COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT ($5,240,513). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$2.8M
Funders on record
10
Grants received
$11M
Net assets
$6.2M
7/10 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 68%
01What it does

What Young Women's Christian Association of the Sauk Valley does

Mission

The ywca of the sauk valley is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

On its FY2024 return the organization reported a significant change in how it conducts a program.

Ywca of the sauk valley closed its thrift store, west end moxie in march 2025.

Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 3).

  1. Domestic violence program: the ywca domestic violence program has served whiteside and lee counties with a full range of domestic violence services since 1982. We serve 600-800 victims of violence per year and provide over 2500 nights of shelter annually (one person staying one night = one night of shelter). The program also annually assists over 200 people in obtaining orders of protection. Our crisis hotline has both sterling and dixon numbers and is answered by trained staff/volunteers at all times.the domestic violence program provides counseling for adults and children, 24-hour hotline, court advocacy, and support groups for adults and children. Caseworkers also work with residential clients to assist them in efforts to become independent and successful, by helping them meet needs for employment, housing, etc. In addition, the program offers/provides healthy relationship groups in area high schools to empower teens and reduce the likelihood of their entering violent relationships.

    $1,402,953 spent$9,901 earned by the program
    54% of program spending
  2. Sexual assault program: established in 1983, the ywca sexual assault program offers a full range of rape crisis services to adults and children. Services include 24-hour crisis response, court and medical advocacy, counseling for adults and children, sexual abuse prevention programs for pre-school through college, and anti-bullying programs in area schools. The program serves 150-200 survivors of sexual assault and abuse per year, and provides abuse prevention services to over 15,000 young people each year. The 24-hour hotline has both dixon and sterling numbers and is answered by trained staff/volunteers at all times.

    $788,725 spent$2,558 earned by the program
    30% of program spending
  3. The association provides services to the broader community that include an immigrant outreach program (300+ clients each year), school-based counseling (200+ students each year), girls' empowerment groups and after school stem clubs (aprox. 90 students per year), diversity training and other activities to meet community needs.

    $341,631 spent$55,707 earned by the program
    13% of program spending
  4. West end moxie thrift shop: this is a resale shop that accepts donations from the public. Ywca clients receive vouchers and can shop for free as they re-establish homes and embark on new careers. Sales from the general public come back to support the west end moxie thrift shop.ywca of the sauk valley closed its thrift store, west end moxie in march 2025.

    $59,006 spent$25,274 earned by the program
    2% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,592,315.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.3M) Expenses 100 ($1.4M) Net assets 100 ($3.6M)2018 Revenue 148 ($1.9M) Expenses 136 ($1.8M) Net assets 101 ($3.6M)2019 Revenue 158 ($2.0M) Expenses 142 ($1.9M) Net assets 104 ($3.7M)2020 Revenue 163 ($2.1M) Expenses 160 ($2.2M) Net assets 103 ($3.7M)2021 Revenue 276 ($3.6M) Expenses 179 ($2.4M) Net assets 146 ($5.2M)2022 Revenue 197 ($2.6M) Expenses 173 ($2.3M) Net assets 140 ($5.0M)2023 Revenue 215 ($2.8M) Expenses 201 ($2.7M) Net assets 149 ($5.3M)2024 Revenue 192 ($2.5M) Expenses 170 ($2.3M) Net assets 162 ($5.8M)2025 Revenue 217 ($2.8M) Expenses 199 ($2.7M) Net assets 172 ($6.2M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (217)Expenses (199)Net assets (172)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $3.8M to $5.4M (+40%).

$3.7M
$3.7M
$3.8M
$3.8M
$5.4M
$5.2M
$5.5M
$5.9M
$6.3M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 70% · 2018 75% · 2019 75% · 2020 80% · 2021 52% · 2022 68% · 2023 80% · 2024 74% · 2025 76%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$57k
’17
$87k
’18
$124k
’19
−$54k
’20
$1.1M
’21
$214k
’22
$59k
’23
$193k
’24
$121k
’25
3.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Rebecca Munoz-Ripley

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed182218191822202119
Joined·+9+4+7+2+7+7+5+4
No longer listed·58633946
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 8 funders, grant income rose $641k → $1.3M.

3 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 9% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 48% of grant income and the top three 86%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY.

48%
largest funder
86%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 46% · 2018 46% · 2019 48% · 2020 48% · 2021 41% · 2022 76% · 2023 49% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

71% of YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 70% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

98% of YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY's grant income comes from Illinois funders.

IL
DC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Illinois out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.0M arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Illinois

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

96% of spending goes to programs.

Program 96%Management 4%Fundraising 0%

Governance

17
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

93%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

IL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY?
YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY (Illinois) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $10,925,855 to it, the largest being ILLINOIS COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT ($5,240,513). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY have?
IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $10,925,855 in grants to YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY, 7 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY?
ILLINOIS COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT is the largest funder on record, with $5,240,513 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Illinois. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Young Women's Christian Association of the Sauk Valley →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 10 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing