· Public charity
Respect Together
RESPECT TOGETHER through our divisions of the national sexual violence resource center and the pennsylvania coalition to advance respect, will create lasting change by mobilizing advocates, service providers, leaders, and communities to support survivors, advance victims' rights and prevent sexual abuse, assault, and harassment.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $262k
- $50k–250k26 grants · $3.9M
- $250k+23 grants · $12M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WOAR | $1,803,558 |
| PITTSBURGH ACTION AGAINST RAPE | $1,166,092 |
| DELAWARE COUNTY VICTIM ASSISTANCE CENTER | $868,999 |
| NETWORK OF VICTIM ASSISTANCE | $769,623 |
| THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS | $639,393 |
| VICTIM SERVICES CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC | $635,720 |
| THE CRIME VICTIMS CENTER OF CHESTER COUNTY INC | $567,250 |
| CRIME VICTIMS COUNCIL OF LEHIGH VALLEY INC | $522,909 |
| VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER | $516,307 |
| SEXUAL ASSAULT RESOURCE AND COUNSELING CENTER | $515,866 |
| CRIME VICTIM CENTER OF ERIE COUNTY INC | $492,347 |
| BLACKBURN CENTER | $380,142 |
| SAFE BERKS | $354,777 |
| WOMEN'S CENTER OF BEAVER COUNTY | $354,739 |
| YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG - VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PREVENTION PROGRAM | $340,087 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $49.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
103 repeat relationships — 60 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WPWOAR PHILADELPHIA CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL VIOLENCE9× · 2017–2025 · $14M · revenue +9% · 72% of their budget
- PAPittsburgh Action Against Rape9× · 2017–2025 · $7.9M · revenue +14% · 28% of their budget
- DCDELAWARE COUNTY VICTIM ASSISTANCE CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $6.6M · revenue +106% · 68% of their budget
Funded once
- BCBLACKBURN CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCEone grant, 2017 · $305k
- YBYWCA BRADFORD- VICTIM'S RESOURCE CENTERone grant, 2017 · $91k
- SFSAN FRANCISCO WOMEN AGAINST RAPEone grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.
The mission of the center for sexual assault and domestic violence survivors is to advocate for non-violence through intervention, education, and prevention in order to create a safe environment for all individuals, families and…
Crime victim advocacy center's mission is to pursue a definition of justice which includes the victim. the center serves victims of all types of crime by providing a wide range of services such as counseling, advocacy, and offering…
CSAJ is a national organization dedicated to enhancing advocacy for survivors of intimate partner violence. We develop and promote advocacy approaches that remove systemic barriers enhance organizational responses and improve professional…
To provide immediate & continuing counseling for victims of rape & sexual assault & referral to appropriate medical, legal, & psychological services, upon request of the victim. the organization provides sexual violence prevention…
To provide free, confidential, and empowering services to victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking while raising awareness and prevention efforts throughout our communities.
Educate and assist victims of rape and domestic violence.
The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.
CBV heals the trauma of sexual assault and domestic violence by providing crisis intervention, safety, advocacy, and education to survivors and our community.
To reduce the impact and harm of sexual violence in the communities we serve.
Crisis intervention & advocacy center is an advocacy program designed to respond to victims of domestic abuse, sexual assualt, stalking, dating violence, and homelessness in adair, adams, clarke, dallas, decatur, guthrie, madison,…
To reduce the effects of family violence and sexual assault and to assist victims of these crimes through programs of support, education and advocacy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Women's Center and the most unlike its peers is Effing Foundation for Sex-Positivity Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
120 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 120 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WOAR PHILADELPHIA CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds Pittsburgh Action Against Rape ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE COUNTY VICTIM ASSISTANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Network of Victim Assistance ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR VICTIMS ↗
- Who funds CRIME VICTIMS' CENTER OF CHESTER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds VICTIM SERVICES CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Sexual Assault Resource & Counseling Center of Lebanon & Schuylkill Cou ↗
- Who funds CRIME VICTIMS COUNCIL OF THE LEHIGH ↗
- Who funds CRIME VICTIM CENTER OF ERIE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds VALORUS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END SEXUAL VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds YWCA GREATER HARRISBURG ↗
- Who funds BLACKBURN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER OF BEAVER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SAFE BERKS ↗
- Who funds VICTIM SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA ↗
- Who funds YWCA LANCASTER ↗
- Who funds THE CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds WRC INC ↗
- Who funds TRANSITIONS OF PA ↗
- Who funds PASSAGES INC ↗
- Who funds VICTIM OUTREACH INTERVENTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE ABUSE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds VICTIMS INTERVENTION PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CARLISLE PA ↗
- Who funds ABUSE & RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ARISE LAWRENCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCES OF FAYETTE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRE SAFE ↗
- Who funds ALICE PAUL HOUSE ↗
- Who funds AWARE INC ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL SEXUAL AND EMOTIONAL ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds A SAFE PLACE ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S RESOURCES OF MONROE CTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence · Mary Kay Ash Foundation · Novo Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Nfl Foundation Inc · YWCA USA Inc · Women's Foundation of California · PlusOnePlusOnePlusOne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Respect Together funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- National Organization of Sisters of Color Ending Sexual Assault — 100% of income from government
- Center for Hope & Healing Inc — 73% of income from government
- Impact Inc — 25% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Barry University Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.