Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence

The PENNSYLVANIA COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE (pcadv) is a statewide collaborative membership organization committed to ending intimate partner violence and all forms of violence and oppression.

$41M
Granted FY2025still arriving
59
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.1M
Largest
01What you fund
0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$206MHealth$15MCrime & Legal$2.4MEnvironment$2.3MOther$67M
02FY2025 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k4 grants · $750k
  • $250k+55 grants · $40M
$601,314
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TURNING POINT LEHIGH VALLEY$2,056,427
WOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC$1,934,067
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER SOUTHWESTERN PA$1,573,928
VICTIM'S INTERVENTION PROGRAM$1,386,495
WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH$1,346,523
TRANSITIONS OF PA$1,342,576
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER INC$1,164,485
SAFE BERKS$1,155,829
ALLE-KISKI AREA HOPE CENTER$1,134,818
ARISE$1,051,989
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER$1,047,717
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER CHESTER COUNTY$1,019,455
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER LANCASTER CO$955,367
SCHUYLKILL HOPE CENTER$925,261
YWCA NORTHCENTRAL PA WISE OPTIONS$879,631
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $157.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%VICTIM OUTREACH INTERVENTION CENTER: $929k → 9%ALLE-KISKI AREA HOPE CENTER: $1.1M → 11%TURNING POINT LEHIGH VALLEY: $2.1M → 11%TRANSITIONS OF PA: $1.3M → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER SOUTHWESTERN PA: $1.6M → 12%YWCA NORTHCENTRAL PA WISE OPTIONS: $880k → 12%SCHUYLKILL HOPE CENTER: $1.3M → 12%ARISE: $1.1M → 13%VICTIMS SERVICES INC: $886k → 16%VICTIM OUTREACH INTERVENTION CENTER: $821k → 9%ALLE-KISKI AREA HOPE CENTER: $900k → 11%TURNING POINT LEHIGH VALLEY: $2.0M → 11%TRANSITIONS OF PA: $1.1M → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER SOUTHWESTERN PA: $1.3M → 12%SCHUYLKILL HOPE CENTER: $925k → 12%ARISE: $887k → 13%VICTIMS SERVICES INC: $803k → 16%VICTIM OUTREACH INTERVENTION CENTER: $812k → 9%ALLE-KISKI AREA HOPE CENTER: $835k → 11%TURNING POINT LEHIGH VALLEY: $1.9M → 11%TRANSITIONS OF PA: $1.1M → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER SOUTHWESTERN PA: $1.3M → 12%SCHUYLKILL HOPE CENTER: $764k → 12%TURNING POINT LEHIGH VALLEY: $1.2M → 11%TRANSITIONS OF PA: $995k → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER SOUTHWESTERN PA: $1.2M → 12%TURNING POINT LEHIGH VALLEY: $1.2M → 11%TRANSITIONS OF PA: $909k → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER SOUTHWESTERN PA: $1.0M → 12%TURNING POINT LEHIGH VALLEY: $825k → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER SOUTHWESTERN PA: $823k → 12%TURNING POINT LEHIGH VALLEY: $820k → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER SOUTHWESTERN PA: $813k → 12%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER SOUTHWESTERN PA: $791k → 12%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER SOUTHWESTERN PA: $791k → 12%SAFE BERKS: $1.2M → 11%SAFE BERKS: $1.1M → 11%SAFE BERKS: $1.1M → 11%SAFE BERKS: $806k → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $2.1M → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $1.7M → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $1.6M → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $1.5M → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $1.3M → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER PITTSBURGH: $1.1M → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER PITTSBURGH: $1.0M → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $1.0M → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER PITTSBURGH: $959k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$291M · 63 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

63 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
3

Total granted

$291M
$1.4M

Still filing today

95%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $16M · revenue +35% · 29% of their budget
  • WA
    WOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $15M · revenue +40%
  • TP
    TURNING POINT OF LEHIGH VALLEY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12M · revenue +97% · 55% of their budget

Funded once

  • YO
    YMCA OF YORK ACCES YORK INC
    one grant, 2017 · $501k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR VICTIMS
    one grant, 2017 · $494k
  • DA
    DOMESTIC ABUSE PROJECT BLAIR CO
    one grant, 2017 · $443k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
2
Womens Aid in Crisis Inc

Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.

Human Services
3
Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

Health
4
Women's Aid Service Inc

To provide safety and empowerment to victims of domestic violence and sexual assault and to work to eliminate sexual victimization and domestic violence through shelter, treatment, education and social change.

Crime & Legal
5
Domestic Violence Sexual Assault Center Inc

Our mission is to provide compassionate support, resources, and advocacy for victims of violent crime. we are dedicated to empowering children, teens and adults in their journey to healing by offering a safe place, emotional care, and the…

Human Services
6
Capital Area Family Violence Intervention Center Inc

To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…

Human Services
7
Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

8
Domestic Violence Project

The mission of SafeHouse Center is to empower survivors of both sexual and intimate partner violence by providing advocacy, support, and promoting social change within our community.

Human Services
9
Women's Alliance Inc

Provide servies to victims of domestic violence, sexual assualt and homeless families.

Human Services
10
Domestic Abusesexual Assault Services Inc

To provide free, confidential, and empowering services to victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking while raising awareness and prevention efforts throughout our communities.

Human Services
11
Safe of Columbia County

Domestic and sexual violence intervention, support, and education.

12
Safe Voices

The mission of Safe Voices is to provide person-to-person, individualized advocacy for all survivors of domestic abuse and violence, sex trafficking, and sexual exploitation in Androscoggin, Franklin, and Oxford Counties and engage our…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Women's Center and the most unlike its peers is Havin Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Senior Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Policy Research and AdvocacyImmigrant Worker SupportDomestic Violence Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr17%9%20–35yr15%76%35–55yr17%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr17%5%20–35yr15%83%35–55yr17%12%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/66
the rest of the field
9%
7,128/78,096

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

44
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/62
Grantees still filing
55/62
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $16,377,359 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGHWOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC — $15,326,986 · Human ServicesWOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INCTURNING POINT OF LEHIGH VALLEY INC — $11,502,827 · Human ServicesTURNING POINT OF LEHIGH VALLEY INCDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF SOUTHWESTERN PA — $9,504,289 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICE CENTER INC — $9,017,691 · Human ServicesTRANSITIONS OF PA — $7,605,964 · Human ServicesSAFE BERKS — $7,232,477 · Human ServicesDomestic Violence Center of Chester County — $6,942,558 · Human Services+30 more — $122,814,678 · Human Services+30 moreWRC INC — $6,830,764 · OtherWRC INCA WOMAN'S PLACE — $6,423,862 · OtherA WOMAN'S PLACELUTHERAN SOCIAL MISSION SOCIETY — $5,805,767 · OtherLUTHERAN SOCIAL MISSION S…WOMEN IN NEED INC — $5,609,378 · OtherWOMEN IN NEED INCTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA — $5,543,968 · OtherTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTI…THE WOMEN'S CENTER — $5,006,026 · OtherTHE WOMEN'S CENTERFAMILY SERVICES INCORPORATED — $4,643,103 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES INCORPORA…WOMEN'S SERVICES INC — $4,413,987 · OtherWOMEN'S SERVICES INCYOUR SAFE HAVEN INC — $3,470,166 · OtherAWARE INC — $3,185,203 · OtherCITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL SEXUAL AND EMOTIONAL ABUSE INC — $3,090,579 · OtherYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BRADFORD — $2,809,698 · OtherTHE ABUSE NETWORK INC — $2,762,223 · Other+9 more — $7,403,681 · Other+9 moreVICTIMS INTERVENTION PROGRAM — $7,156,687 · HealthCONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC — $4,516,043 · HealthABUSE & RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC — $3,022,173 · HealthFAMILY SERVICE AND CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY OF VENANGO COUNTY — $1,968,730 · Crime & LegalNORTH PENN LEGAL SERVICES — $439,857 · Crime & LegalYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER PENNSYLVANIA — $2,289,570 · Environment
Human Services$206,324,829Other$66,998,405Health$14,694,903Crime & Legal$2,408,587Environment$2,289,570

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $16,377,359 over 9y, 29% of budgetWOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC — $15,326,986 over 9y, 17% of budgetTURNING POINT OF LEHIGH VALLEY INC — $11,502,827 over 9y, 55% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF SOUTHWESTERN PA — $9,504,289 over 9y, 53% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICE CENTER INC — $9,017,691 over 9y, 46% of budgetTRANSITIONS OF PA — $7,605,964 over 9y, 40% of budgetSAFE BERKS — $7,232,477 over 9y, 28% of budgetVICTIMS INTERVENTION PROGRAM — $7,156,687 over 9y, 59% of budgetDomestic Violence Center of Chester County — $6,942,558 over 9y, 33% of budgetWRC INC — $6,830,764 over 9y, 25% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF LANCASTER COUNTY INC — $6,597,291 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetVICTIM OUTREACH INTERVENTION CENTER — $6,520,605 over 9y, 35% of budgetSCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS — $6,471,271 over 9y, 61% of budgetA WOMAN'S PLACE — $6,423,862 over 9y, 28% of budgetALLE-KISKI AREA HOPE CENTER — $6,226,144 over 9y, 32% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL MISSION SOCIETY — $5,805,767 over 9y, 20% of budgetSAFENET INC — $5,693,500 over 9y, 46% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC — $5,609,378 over 9y, 33% of budgetTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA — $5,543,968 over 8y, 8.9% of budgetDomestic Abuse Project of Delaware County Inc — $5,524,642 over 9y, 32% of budgetARISE LAWRENCE COUNTY — $5,320,880 over 9y, 32% of budgetLAUREL HOUSE — $5,086,533 over 9y, 19% of budgetCENTRE SAFE — $5,016,311 over 9y, 28% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER — $5,006,026 over 9y, 59% of budgetYWCA GREATER HARRISBURG — $4,815,197 over 9y, 9.9% of budgetBLACKBURN CENTER INC — $4,670,411 over 9y, 24% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES INCORPORATED — $4,643,103 over 8y, 8.4% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF CUMBERLAND & PERRY COUNTIES — $4,528,615 over 9y, 48% of budgetCONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC — $4,516,043 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER OF BEAVER COUNTY — $4,496,588 over 9y, 29% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTHCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA — $4,415,353 over 9y, 32% of budgetWOMEN'S SERVICES INC — $4,413,987 over 9y, 38% of budgetCLINTON COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $4,085,346 over 9y, 59% of budgetHUNTINGDON HOUSE — $3,935,863 over 9y, 74% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY — $3,891,269 over 9y, 50% of budgetWOMEN'S RESOURCES OF MONROE CTY INC — $3,815,715 over 9y, 34% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION OF LEBANON COUNTY INC — $3,639,826 over 9y, 78% of budgetYOUR SAFE HAVEN INC — $3,470,166 over 9y, 46% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION INC — $3,353,582 over 9y, 9.3% of budgetAWARE INC — $3,185,203 over 9y, 40% of budgetWOMEN IN TRANSITION — $3,169,294 over 9y, 45% of budgetCITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL SEXUAL AND EMOTIONAL ABUSE INC — $3,090,579 over 9y, 54% of budgetABUSE & RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC — $3,022,173 over 9y, 47% of budgetCRISIS CENTER NORTH INC — $2,957,778 over 9y, 31% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BRADFORD — $2,809,698 over 9y, 22% of budgetVICTIM SERVICES INC — $2,772,089 over 4y, 35% of budgetALICE PAUL HOUSE — $2,771,722 over 9y, 30% of budgetTHE ABUSE NETWORK INC — $2,762,223 over 9y, 49% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds WOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC
  • Who funds TURNING POINT OF LEHIGH VALLEY INC
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF SOUTHWESTERN PA
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICE CENTER INC
  • Who funds TRANSITIONS OF PA
  • Who funds SAFE BERKS
  • Who funds VICTIMS INTERVENTION PROGRAM
  • Who funds Domestic Violence Center of Chester County
  • Who funds WRC INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF LANCASTER COUNTY INC
  • Who funds VICTIM OUTREACH INTERVENTION CENTER
  • Who funds SCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS
  • Who funds A WOMAN'S PLACE
  • Who funds ALLE-KISKI AREA HOPE CENTER
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL MISSION SOCIETY
  • Who funds SAFENET INC
  • Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC
  • Who funds THE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA
  • Who funds Domestic Abuse Project of Delaware County Inc
  • Who funds ARISE LAWRENCE COUNTY
  • Who funds LAUREL HOUSE
  • Who funds CENTRE SAFE
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER
  • Who funds YWCA GREATER HARRISBURG
  • Who funds BLACKBURN CENTER INC
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES INCORPORATED
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF CUMBERLAND & PERRY COUNTIES
  • Who funds CONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER OF BEAVER COUNTY
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTHCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds WOMEN'S SERVICES INC
  • Who funds CLINTON COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTER INC
  • Who funds HUNTINGDON HOUSE
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
  • Who funds WOMEN'S RESOURCES OF MONROE CTY INC
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION OF LEBANON COUNTY INC
  • Who funds YOUR SAFE HAVEN INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION INC
  • Who funds HAVIN FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Respect TogetherPA74× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Respect Together · Mary Kay Ash Foundation · Betty and Leo Balzereit Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Independence Foundation · Northwest Charitable Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Firstenergy Foundation · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · The Gap Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph