Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

World Education Services Inc

Help people thrive in new places and help society see the value of people's education & experience.

$6.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$537k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Employment$7.0MCommunity Improvement$3.1MEducation$3.1MHuman Services$2.6MInternational$1.5MPublic Safety & Disaster$890kCivil Rights$875kPublic Benefit$670kOther$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 40 grants below total $4,027,167 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,912,235 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,885,068 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k27 grants · $3.1M
  • $250k+2 grants · $837k
$100,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$260M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TECHSTARS PARTNERS 2021 LLC$536,667
SORENSON IMPACT INSTITUTE$300,000
LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE$225,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SYSTEM HEADS$200,000
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INVESTORS ALLIANCE INC$200,000
UPWARDLY GLOBAL$160,000
WORKERS DEFENSE PROJECT$150,000
RESILIENCE FORCE$150,000
INCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY$125,000
WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS$110,000
NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS INC$110,000
INLAND EMPIRE IMMIGRANT YOUTH COLLECTIVE$100,000
FWDUS EDUCATION FUND (GRANTEE NATIONAL DIGNITY FOR FAMILIES FUND)$100,000
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT$100,000
ALIANZA AMERICAS$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $3.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Pioneer Valley Workers Center: $100k → 12%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS INC: $100k → 16%Welcoming Center for New Pennsylvanians: $242k → 22%ASIAN IMMIGRANT WOMEN ADVOCATES INC: $10k → 10%MAAC (Met Area Advisory Com on Anti-Poverty): $25k → 11%INLAND EMPIRE IMMIGRANT YOUTH COLLECTIVE: $100k → 11%CENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION COLLABORATIVE: $20k → 19%RUSA LGBTQ CORP: $50k → 6%GRANNIES RESPOND ABUELAS RESPONDEN INC: $20k → 9%CENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE IN SUNSET PARK: $40k → 20%ENCUENTRO (LAPLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE): $240k → 14%HISPANIC SERVICES COUNCIL INC: $10k → 13%REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT VOICES IN ACTION: $100k → 10%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY (COMSA): $120k → 10%Colaborative La Milpa: $25k → 12%THE PIVOT FUND INC: $100k → 13%WELCOMING AMERICA: $25k → 14%PIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER: $40k → 12%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMLESSNESS INC: $75k → 16%Neighborhood Development Center: $200k → 14%the Welcoming center: $21k → 22%RUSA LGBTQ CORP: $20k → 6%GRANNIES RESPONDABUELAS RESPONDEN INC: $20k → 9%LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE: $225k → 14%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY COMSA: $70k → 10%WELCOMING AMERICA: $110k → 13%WOMEN WATCH AFRIKA INC: $10k → 14%WASHINGTON ACADEMY FOR INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GRADUATES: $175k → 9%PIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER: $22k → 12%NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $20k → 14%SCO Family of Services: $200k → 6%CENTER FOR THE INTEGRATION AND ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS INC: $10k → 13%Welcoming America: $101k → 13%WASHINGTON ACADEMY FOR INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GRADUATES: $20k → 9%FRESH START REFUGEE ASSISTANT CENTER: $10k → 6%PIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER: $20k → 12%PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS: $100k → 11%La Plaza de Encuentro: $200k → 14%COMMUNITY CREDIT LAB: $100k → 9%National Partnership for New Americans: $150k → 14%WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $110k → 22%NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS INC: $110k → 14%WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $109k → 22%NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS: $15k → 14%WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $10k → 22%GARMENT WORKER CENTER: $150k → 14%LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO: $15k → 14%IRC'S CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC: $75k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
VA
AZ
NM
NC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $2.4M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$2.4M · 100% · 29 grants

Stated purpose: DONATION - FUND AMBASSADOR · DIRECTLY SOLICITED GRANT · DONATION

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 44 repeat orgs$7.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

44 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
66

Total granted

$15M
$5.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+28%

Still filing today

93%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationEmploymentInternationalCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $2.1M · revenue +171%
  • UG
    UPWARDLY GLOBAL
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +323%
  • BS
    Building Skills Partnership
    4× · 2020–2023 · $790k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • EG
    ECHOING GREEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1.1M · revenue -35%
  • VI
    VILCAP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $605k · revenue +53%
  • TS
    THE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue -23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Immigrants Rising

We empower people to achieve their educational and career goals through personal, institutional and policy transformation.

Human Services
2
Center for Immigrant Progress

The organizations primary exempt purpose is charitable and educational.

—
3
Justice Action Center

Justice Action Center JAC pilots an innovative model that advances the rights of immigrant communities by connecting cutting-edge impact litigation and compelling narrative and communications content. The purpose of JAC is to advance the…

Civil Rights
4
California Immigrant Policy Center

The california immigrant policy center upholds the humanity of immigrant communities in california by transforming systems to achieve racial, social, and economic justice.

Civil Rights
5
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
6
Refugee & Immigrant Center for Education & Legal Services

To deliver legal and social services to people and families who want to put down roots in the u.s. and cultivate welcoming communities that uphold our collective freedoms.

Civil Rights
7
Refugee Womens Alliance

ReWA is a non-profit, multi-ethnic organization that promotes inclusion, independence, personal leadership, and strong communities by providing refugee and immigrant women and their families with culturally and linguistically appropriate…

Human Services
8
Ayuda Inc

Ayuda's mission is to advocate for low-income immigrants through direct legal, social and language services, training and outreach in washington, d.c., maryland, and virginia. we envision a community where all immigrants succeed and thrive…

Human Services
9
Institute for Sound Public Policy Fka Progressives for Immigration Re

Progressives for immigration reform's mission is to protect low wage american workers from unemployment and wage suppression caused by unfair labor and trade practices, including importation of large numbers of low wage foreign workers who…

Civil Rights
10
Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International
11
Guernica Centre for InternationalJustice

The Guernica Centre for International Justice represents the interests of victims in national and international legal proceedings, putting in place transnational accountability strategies that seek to maximize the protection of victims'…

International
12
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fwdus Education Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sorenson Impact Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Jewish Community Organizati…Community Arts CentersCommunity College Foundatio…Christian Missionary Organi…Local Food System Organizat…Environmental Conservation …Affordable Housing Developm…Immigrant Worker SupportCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr14%25%5–10yr19%34%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%15%5–10yr19%43%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%5%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%4/135
the rest of the field
13%
240,392/1,819,430

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

122 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 122 of the 136 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
118/122
Grantees still filing
69/122
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC — $2,093,380 · EmploymentJOBS FOR THE FUTURE INCUPWARDLY GLOBAL — $1,080,000 · EmploymentUPWARDLY GLOBALBuilding Skills Partnership — $790,000 · EmploymentBuilding Skills Partnershi…NATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS — $320,000 · EmploymentNATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORC…FLORECIENDO — $300,000 · EmploymentFLORECIENDOAction Research Collaborative Inc — $270,000 · Employment+5 more — $475,000 · Employment+5 moreLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE — $680,000 · Human ServicesLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTR…WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS — $491,581 · Human ServicesWELCOMING CENTER FOR…WELCOMING AMERICA INC — $321,000 · Human ServicesWELCOMING AMERICA IN…NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS — $282,500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP…SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES — $240,000 · Human ServicesSCO FAMILY OF SERVIC…NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $220,000 · Human ServicesWashington Academy for International Medical Gradu — $195,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY INC — $190,000 · Human ServicesPIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER INC — $181,600 · Human ServicesFUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNES — $175,000 · Human ServicesGarment Worker Center — $150,000 · Human Services+20 more — $1,037,632 · Human Services+20 moreTECHSTARS PARTNERS 2021 LLC — $940,000 · OtherTECHSTARS PARTNERS 2021 LLCVILCAP INC — $604,555 · OtherVILCAP INCWORLD EDUCATION INC — $518,931 · OtherWORLD EDUCATION INCMISSION DRIVEN FINANCE — $245,000 · OtherTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC — $500,000 · OtherTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INCCENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY — $325,000 · OtherNEO Philanthropy Inc — $300,000 · OtherONE FAIR WAGE INC — $240,000 · OtherTECHEQUITY COLLABORATIVE — $325,000 · Other+45 more — $2,761,976 · Other+45 moreECHOING GREEN INC — $1,127,260 · EducationECHOING GREEN IN…CODE THE DREAM INC — $565,000 · EducationCODE THE DREAM I…NASH — $530,000 · EducationNASHGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $248,449 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVE…FWDUS EDUCATION FUND INC — $190,000 · EducationFWDUS EDUCATION …WORKERS DEFENSE PROJECT — $175,000 · Education+11 more — $450,000 · Education+11 moreINCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY — $580,000 · Community ImprovementAFRICAN BRIDGE NETWORK — $405,000 · Community ImprovementMISSION ASSET FUND — $220,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMON FUTURE — $200,000 · Community ImprovementVENEZUELANS AND IMMIGRANTS AID INC — $70,000 · Community ImprovementSuma — $70,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $20,000 · Community ImprovementSorenson Impact Foundation — $300,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION — $250,000 · PhilanthropyASSET FUNDERS NETWORK — $100,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION — $90,000 · PhilanthropyThe Chicago Community Trust — $53,000 · PhilanthropyInternational Rescue Committee INC — $565,000 · InternationalAlianza Americas — $100,000 · International+8 more — $95,000 · International
Employment$5,328,380Human Services$4,164,313Other$6,760,462Education$3,285,709Community Improvement$1,565,000Philanthropy$893,000International$760,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC — $2,093,380 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetECHOING GREEN INC — $1,127,260 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetUPWARDLY GLOBAL — $1,080,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetBuilding Skills Partnership — $790,000 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE — $680,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetVILCAP INC — $604,555 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetINCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY — $580,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $565,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCODE THE DREAM INC — $565,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetNASH — $530,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetWORLD EDUCATION INC — $518,931 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC — $500,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS — $491,581 over 5y, 9.9% of budgetAFRICAN BRIDGE NETWORK — $405,000 over 3y, 90% of budgetCENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY — $325,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetTECHEQUITY COLLABORATIVE — $325,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetWELCOMING AMERICA INC — $321,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetNATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS — $320,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetSorenson Impact Foundation — $300,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetFLORECIENDO — $300,000 over 4y, 45% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $300,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS — $282,500 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetAction Research Collaborative Inc — $270,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $248,449 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE FAIR WAGE INC — $240,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetSCO FAMILY OF SERVICES — $240,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $220,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMISSION ASSET FUND — $220,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMON FUTURE — $200,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INVESTORS ALLIANCE — $200,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetWashington Academy for International Medical Gradu — $195,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY INC — $190,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetFWDUS EDUCATION FUND INC — $190,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetImmigrant Advocate Response Collaborative Inc — $190,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetPIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER INC — $181,600 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetFUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNES — $175,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetWORKERS DEFENSE PROJECT — $175,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetMANY LANGUAGES ONE VOICE — $155,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetCENTER FOR SOUTHEAST ASIANS — $150,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetRESILIENCE FORCE — $150,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCenter for Land-Based Learning — $150,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGarment Worker Center — $150,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC — $145,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCircle of Health International — $140,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetCENTREVILLE IMMIGRATION FORUM — $117,132 over 2y, 20% of budgetAlianza Americas — $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NEO Philanthropy IncAmalgamated Charitabl…The Ford FoundationImpactassetsincWK Kellogg FoundationFoundation to Promote…GofundmeorgThe Kresge FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…The James Irvine Foun…Tides FoundationRockefeller Philanthr…
NEO Philanthropy IncNY39.7× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Impactassetsinc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Gofundmeorg · The Kresge Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Tides Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization World Education Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 39%
  • Pioneer Valley Workers Center Inc — 53% of income from government
  • Havenly — 40% of income from government
  • Jewish Vocational Service Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Jobs for the Future Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Verde Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Hope for Haiti Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 136 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines