Skip to content
World Education Services Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

World Education Services Inc

Help people thrive in new places and help society see the value of people's education & experience.

$6.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$537k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Employment$7.0MCommunity Improvement$3.1MEducation$3.1MHuman Services$2.6MInternational$1.5MPublic Safety & Disaster$890kCivil Rights$875kPublic Benefit$670kOther$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 40 grants below total $4,027,167, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,912,235 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,885,068 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k27 grants · $3.1M
  • $250k+2 grants · $837k
$100,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$260M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TECHSTARS PARTNERS 2021 LLC$536,667
SORENSON IMPACT INSTITUTE$300,000
LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE$225,000
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INVESTORS ALLIANCE INC$200,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SYSTEM HEADS$200,000
UPWARDLY GLOBAL$160,000
RESILIENCE FORCE$150,000
WORKERS DEFENSE PROJECT$150,000
INCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY$125,000
WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS$110,000
NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS INC$110,000
INDIANA UNDOCUMENTED YOUTH ALLIANCE$100,000
HAVENLY$100,000
INLAND EMPIRE IMMIGRANT YOUTH COLLECTIVE$100,000
ASSET FUNDERS NETWORK$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $3.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Pioneer Valley Workers Center: $100k → 12%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS INC: $100k → 16%Welcoming Center for New Pennsylvanians: $242k → 22%ASIAN IMMIGRANT WOMEN ADVOCATES INC: $10k → 10%MAAC (Met Area Advisory Com on Anti-Poverty): $25k → 11%INLAND EMPIRE IMMIGRANT YOUTH COLLECTIVE: $100k → 11%CENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION COLLABORATIVE: $20k → 19%RUSA LGBTQ CORP: $50k → 6%GRANNIES RESPOND ABUELAS RESPONDEN INC: $20k → 9%CENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE IN SUNSET PARK: $40k → 20%ENCUENTRO (LAPLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE): $240k → 14%HISPANIC SERVICES COUNCIL INC: $10k → 13%REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT VOICES IN ACTION: $100k → 10%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY (COMSA): $120k → 10%Colaborative La Milpa: $25k → 12%THE PIVOT FUND INC: $100k → 13%WELCOMING AMERICA: $25k → 14%PIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER: $40k → 12%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMLESSNESS INC: $75k → 16%Neighborhood Development Center: $200k → 14%the Welcoming center: $21k → 22%RUSA LGBTQ CORP: $20k → 6%GRANNIES RESPONDABUELAS RESPONDEN INC: $20k → 9%LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE: $225k → 14%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY COMSA: $70k → 10%WELCOMING AMERICA: $110k → 13%WOMEN WATCH AFRIKA INC: $10k → 14%WASHINGTON ACADEMY FOR INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GRADUATES: $175k → 9%PIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER: $22k → 12%NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $20k → 14%SCO Family of Services: $200k → 6%CENTER FOR THE INTEGRATION AND ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS INC: $10k → 13%La Plaza de Encuentro: $200k → 14%Welcoming America: $101k → 13%WASHINGTON ACADEMY FOR INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GRADUATES: $20k → 9%FRESH START REFUGEE ASSISTANT CENTER: $10k → 6%PIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER: $20k → 12%PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS: $100k → 11%COMMUNITY CREDIT LAB: $100k → 9%National Partnership for New Americans: $150k → 14%WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $110k → 22%NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS INC: $110k → 14%WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $109k → 22%NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS: $15k → 14%WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $10k → 22%GARMENT WORKER CENTER: $150k → 14%LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO: $15k → 14%IRC'S CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC: $75k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
VA
AZ
NM
NC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $2.4M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$2.4M · 100% · 29 grants

Stated purpose: DONATION - FUND AMBASSADOR · DIRECTLY SOLICITED GRANT · DONATION

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 44 repeat orgs$7.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
66

Total granted

$15M
$5.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+28%

Still filing today

93%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationEmploymentInternationalCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $2.1M · revenue +171%
  • UG
    UPWARDLY GLOBAL
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +323%
  • BS
    Building Skills Partnership
    4× · 2020–2023 · $790k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • EG
    ECHOING GREEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1.1M · revenue -35%
  • VI
    VILCAP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $605k · revenue +53%
  • TS
    THE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Immigrants Rising

We empower people to achieve their educational and career goals through personal, institutional and policy transformation.

Human Services
2
Center for Immigrant Progress

The organizations primary exempt purpose is charitable and educational.

—
3
Justice Action Center

Justice Action Center JAC pilots an innovative model that advances the rights of immigrant communities by connecting cutting-edge impact litigation and compelling narrative and communications content. The purpose of JAC is to advance the…

Civil Rights
4
California Immigrant Policy Center

The california immigrant policy center upholds the humanity of immigrant communities in california by transforming systems to achieve racial, social, and economic justice.

Civil Rights
5
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
6
Refugee & Immigrant Center for Education & Legal Services

To deliver legal and social services to people and families who want to put down roots in the u.s. and cultivate welcoming communities that uphold our collective freedoms.

Civil Rights
7
Refugee Womens Alliance

ReWA is a non-profit, multi-ethnic organization that promotes inclusion, independence, personal leadership, and strong communities by providing refugee and immigrant women and their families with culturally and linguistically appropriate…

Human Services
8
Ayuda Inc

Ayuda's mission is to advocate for low-income immigrants through direct legal, social and language services, training and outreach in washington, d.c., maryland, and virginia. we envision a community where all immigrants succeed and thrive…

Human Services
9
Institute for Sound Public Policy Fka Progressives for Immigration Re

Progressives for immigration reform's mission is to protect low wage american workers from unemployment and wage suppression caused by unfair labor and trade practices, including importation of large numbers of low wage foreign workers who…

Civil Rights
10
Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International
11
Guernica Centre for InternationalJustice

The Guernica Centre for International Justice represents the interests of victims in national and international legal proceedings, putting in place transnational accountability strategies that seek to maximize the protection of victims'…

International
12
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fwdus Education Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sorenson Impact Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

122 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 122 of the 136 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
118/122
Grantees still filing
71/122
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC: $2,093,380 · EmploymentJOBS FOR THE FUTURE INCUPWARDLY GLOBAL: $1,080,000 · EmploymentUPWARDLY GLOBALBuilding Skills Partnership: $790,000 · EmploymentBuilding Skills Partnershi…NATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS: $320,000 · EmploymentNATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORC…FLORECIENDO: $300,000 · EmploymentFLORECIENDOAction Research Collaborative Inc: $270,000 · Employment+5 more: $475,000 · Employment+5 moreLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE: $680,000 · Human ServicesLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTR…WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $491,581 · Human ServicesWELCOMING CENTER FOR…WELCOMING AMERICA INC: $321,000 · Human ServicesWELCOMING AMERICA IN…NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS: $282,500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP…SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $240,000 · Human ServicesSCO FAMILY OF SERVIC…NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $220,000 · Human ServicesWashington Academy for International Medical Gradu: $195,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY INC: $190,000 · Human ServicesPIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER INC: $181,600 · Human ServicesFUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNES: $175,000 · Human ServicesGarment Worker Center: $150,000 · Human Services+20 more: $1,037,632 · Human Services+20 moreTECHSTARS PARTNERS 2021 LLC: $940,000 · OtherTECHSTARS PARTNERS 2021 LLCVILCAP INC: $604,555 · OtherVILCAP INCWORLD EDUCATION INC: $518,931 · OtherWORLD EDUCATION INCMISSION DRIVEN FINANCE: $245,000 · OtherTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC: $500,000 · OtherTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INCCENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY: $325,000 · OtherNEO Philanthropy Inc: $300,000 · OtherONE FAIR WAGE INC: $240,000 · OtherTECHEQUITY COLLABORATIVE: $325,000 · Other+45 more: $2,761,976 · Other+45 moreECHOING GREEN INC: $1,127,260 · EducationECHOING GREEN IN…CODE THE DREAM INC: $565,000 · EducationCODE THE DREAM I…NASH: $530,000 · EducationNASHGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $248,449 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVE…FWDUS EDUCATION FUND INC: $190,000 · EducationFWDUS EDUCATION …WORKERS DEFENSE PROJECT: $175,000 · Education+11 more: $450,000 · Education+11 moreINCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY: $580,000 · Community ImprovementAFRICAN BRIDGE NETWORK: $405,000 · Community ImprovementMISSION ASSET FUND: $220,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMON FUTURE: $200,000 · Community ImprovementSuma: $70,000 · Community ImprovementVENEZUELANS AND IMMIGRANTS AID INC: $70,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $20,000 · Community ImprovementSorenson Impact Foundation: $300,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION: $250,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyASSET FUNDERS NETWORK: $100,000 · PhilanthropyOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION: $90,000 · PhilanthropyThe Chicago Community Trust: $53,000 · PhilanthropyInternational Rescue Committee INC: $565,000 · InternationalAlianza Americas: $100,000 · International+8 more: $95,000 · International
Employment$5,328,380Human Services$4,164,313Other$6,760,462Education$3,285,709Community Improvement$1,565,000Philanthropy$893,000International$760,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC: $2,093,380 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetECHOING GREEN INC: $1,127,260 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetUPWARDLY GLOBAL: $1,080,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetBuilding Skills Partnership: $790,000 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE: $680,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetVILCAP INC: $604,555 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetINCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY: $580,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetCODE THE DREAM INC: $565,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $565,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNASH: $530,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetWORLD EDUCATION INC: $518,931 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC: $500,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $491,581 over 5y, 9.9% of budgetAFRICAN BRIDGE NETWORK: $405,000 over 3y, 90% of budgetTECHEQUITY COLLABORATIVE: $325,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetCENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY: $325,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetWELCOMING AMERICA INC: $321,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetNATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS: $320,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $300,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSorenson Impact Foundation: $300,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetFLORECIENDO: $300,000 over 4y, 45% of budgetNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS: $282,500 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetAction Research Collaborative Inc: $270,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $248,449 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE FAIR WAGE INC: $240,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetSCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $240,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION ASSET FUND: $220,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $220,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INVESTORS ALLIANCE: $200,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetCOMMON FUTURE: $200,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWashington Academy for International Medical Gradu: $195,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetFWDUS EDUCATION FUND INC: $190,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY INC: $190,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetImmigrant Advocate Response Collaborative Inc: $190,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetPIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER INC: $181,600 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetWORKERS DEFENSE PROJECT: $175,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetFUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNES: $175,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetMANY LANGUAGES ONE VOICE: $155,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetRESILIENCE FORCE: $150,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetGarment Worker Center: $150,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCENTER FOR SOUTHEAST ASIANS: $150,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetCenter for Land-Based Learning: $150,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetNEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC: $145,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCircle of Health International: $140,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetCENTREVILLE IMMIGRATION FORUM: $117,132 over 2y, 20% of budgetONLINE NEWS ASSOCIATION: $100,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NEO Philanthropy IncAmalgamated Charitabl…The Ford FoundationImpactassetsincWK Kellogg FoundationFoundation to Promote…GofundmeorgThe Kresge FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…The James Irvine Foun…Tides FoundationRockefeller Philanthr…
NEO Philanthropy IncNY39.7× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Impactassetsinc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Gofundmeorg · The Kresge Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Tides Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization World Education Services Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from World Education Services Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 39%
  • Pioneer Valley Workers Center Inc: 53% of income from government
  • Havenly: 40% of income from government
  • Jewish Vocational Service Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Jobs for the Future Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Verde Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Hope for Haiti Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 136 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on World Education Services’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home