Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

William and Lizabeth Whitehouse Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
0160% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20192024.

Health$41kEducation$2kHuman Services$1kHousing & Shelter$515International$493Public Benefit$250Philanthropy$50Animals$38Other$30k
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$300
Median grant
9
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION$12,855
AMERICAN FUNDRAISING FOUNDATION$9,500
UC GARDNER NERUOSCIENCE INSTITUTE$2,500
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS$600
LUKE'S WINGS$550
OPERATION RESTORED WARRIOR$550
MALTA HOUSE$515
CURE CHILDHOOD CANCER$515
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$493
CHRIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$300
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$300
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$250
MONTGOMERY LODGE 94$250
MEADOWS$250
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$105
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEW HOPE CENTER: $500 → 11%NEW HOPE CENTER: $250 → 11%NEW HOPE CENTER: $100 → 11%NEW HOPE CENTER: $50 → 11%BEECHACRES PARENTING CENTER: $250 → 16%BEECH ACRES PARENTING CENTER: $100 → 16%BEECH ACRES PARENTING CENTER: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OH
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
TN
DC
OK
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$58k · 17 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
14

Total granted

$58k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+29%

Still filing today

47%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterInternationalPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue +112%
  • IP
    Inter Parish Ministry Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $950 · revenue +181%
  • NH
    NEW HOPE CENTER INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $900 · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • UF
    UC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • ES
    EASTER SEALS
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $508 · revenue +25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
7
Trihealth Physician Institute

Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.

Health
8
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
9
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
10
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
11
Conquering Congenital Heart Disease

At conquering chd we exist to conquerin the most common birth defect. we engage, listen, learn, and act. we create visibility and empower all impacted by chd. we accomplish this through awareness, knowledge, community and research.

Health
12
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is Trout Unlimited Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION — $37,105 · HealthTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATIONLUKE'S WINGS — $1,550 · Health+7 more — $2,403 · Health+7 moreAMERICAN FUNDRAISING FOUNDATION INC — $9,500 · OtherAMERICAN FUNDRAISING FOUNDATION INCUC GARDNER NERUOSCIENCE INSTITUTE — $5,000 · OtherUC GARDNER NERUOSCIENCE INSTITUTEUNIIV CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $3,000 · OtherUNIIV CINCINNATI FOUNDATIONLIVING ARR FOR DEVELOP DISABLED — $2,750 · OtherLIVING ARR FOR DEVELOP DISABLEDUC FOUNDATION — $2,500 · OtherUC FOUNDATIONEASTER SEALS — $1,800 · OtherEASTER SEALSOPERATION RESTORED WARRIOR — $1,250 · Other+20 more — $4,551 · Other+20 moreSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $2,346 · EducationNEW HOPE CENTER INC — $900 · Human ServicesBEECH ACRES — $450 · Human ServicesMALTA HOUSE INC — $515 · Housing & ShelterCompassion International Incorporated — $493 · InternationalJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $250 · Public Benefit
Health$41,058Other$30,351Education$2,346Human Services$1,350Housing & Shelter$515International$493Public Benefit$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION — $37,105 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $2,346 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLUKE'S WINGS — $1,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetInter Parish Ministry Inc — $950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HOPE CENTER INC — $900 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $705 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMALTA HOUSE INC — $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCure Childhood Cancer Inc — $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $508 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEECH ACRES — $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Christ Hospital Foundation — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKCASTLE HOSPITAL & RESPIRATORY CARE CENTER INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC — $38 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN FUNDRAISING FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LUKE'S WINGS
  • Who funds Inter Parish Ministry Inc
  • Who funds NEW HOPE CENTER INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds MALTA HOUSE INC
  • Who funds Cure Childhood Cancer Inc
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds BEECH ACRES
  • Who funds The Christ Hospital Foundation
  • Who funds ROCKCASTLE HOSPITAL & RESPIRATORY CARE CENTER INC
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization William and Lizabeth Whitehouse Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William and Lizabeth Whitehouse Family Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to William and Lizabeth Whitehouse Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph