Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Westconsin Credit Union

The organization is a cooperative, nonprofit corporation, incorporated under wisconsin state law to encourage thrift among its members, create a source of credit at a fair and reasonable cost, and provide an opportunity for its members to improve their economic and social conditions.

$161k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Philanthropy$186kFood & Nutrition$92kEducation$91kHealth$89kRecreation & Sports$70kHuman Services$60kCommunity Improvement$50kArts & Culture$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $98,825 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $160,966 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $62,141 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$12,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF DUNN COUNTY$16,550
CITY OF RIVER FALLS$15,000
RICE LAKE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION$12,500
CITY OF NEW RICHMOND$12,500
OUR NEIGHBORS PLACE$11,275
FIVE LOAVES FOOD SHELF$11,000
STEPPING STONES OF DUNN COUNTY INC$10,000
CHIPPEWA VALLEY HEALTH COOPERATIVE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNITED WAY OF ST CROIX VALLEY: $21k → 5%EMBRACE SERVICES INC: $6k → 13%UNITED WAY OF ST CROIX VALLEY: $19k → 5%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC: $6k → 10%UNITED WAY OF ST CROIX VALLEY: $12k → 5%UNITED WAY OF ST CROIX VALLEY: $12k → 5%UNITED WAY OF ST CROIX VALLEY: $10k → 5%TURNING POINT FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$547k · 16 repeat orgs$171k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
19

Total granted

$547k
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+17%

Still filing today

81%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    STEPPING STONES OF DUNN COUNTY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $61k · revenue +19%
  • BA
    BALDWIN AREA MEDICAL CENTER INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $33k · revenue +102%
  • NT
    NORTHWOOD TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - RIVER FALLS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +63%
  • DC
    DUNN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +22%
  • BY
    BARRON YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Reedsburg Area Medical Center

Reedsburg area medical center, always there, going beyond the expected to provide compassionate, quality, and efficient health care.

Health
2
United Way of Clinton County Iowa

To provide leadership in our communities to 1) identify our most pressing human care needs, 2) to work together to direct the time, energy and resources towards addressing those needs to improve our quality of life.

—
3
Riverview Healthcare Association

We deliver a healthcare experience that consistently exceeds patients' expectations through exceptional people - our people are our foundation. we employ trusted, dedicated professionals who serve with compassion, empathy and respect.…

Health
4
Heart of the Valley Chamber of Commerce

To promote and foster awareness of economic development and civic issues in the heart of the valley area of wisconsin

Community Improvement
5
Kishwaukee United Way

To improve lives by sharing community resources

Philanthropy
6
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
7
Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation

The mission of the oshkosh area community foundation corporation is to strengthen our communities. the organization accomplishes this through: leadership and funding to address current and emerging needs; collaboration and partnership with…

Philanthropy
8
Racine County Opportunity Center

Our focus is on making shortterm investments which will significantly improve the longterm wellbeing of our clients. we will measure our performance against these standards by continuously communicating with our clients, and will take…

Human Services
9
Kenosha Community Health Center Inc

Kenosha community health center, inc.'s purpose is to provide primary care and referral health services to disadvantaged and underserved populations and promote and ensure that basic primary health services are accessible to uninsured and…

Health
10
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
11
Winona Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote business development and tourism in winona minnesota and the surrounding area

—
12
Help of Door County Inc

The mission of help of door county, inc. is to eliminate domestic abuse through prevention and intervention services and to advocate for social change.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way St Croix and Red Cedar Valleys Inc and the most unlike its peers is Veterans of Foreign Wars-Post 10818. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%6%<5yr12%3%5–10yr22%18%10–20yr14%15%20–35yr18%38%35–55yr17%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%6%<5yr12%0%5–10yr22%11%10–20yr14%14%20–35yr18%47%35–55yr17%22%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/43
the rest of the field
8%
185/2,352

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
19/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF DUNN COUNTY INC — $95,464 · OtherUNITED WAY OF DUNN COUNTY INCSTEPPING STONES OF DUNN COUNTY INC — $61,327 · OtherSTEPPING STONES OF DUNN COUNTY INCRIVER FALLS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $50,000 · OtherRIVER FALLS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONNORTHWOOD TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · OtherNORTHWOOD TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCCity of River Falls — $25,000 · OtherCity of River FallsFIVE LOAVES FOOD & CLOTHING CENTER — $21,000 · OtherCITY OF NEW RICHMOND — $17,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY — $15,025 · Other+12 more — $108,029 · Other+12 moreUNITED WAY ST CROIX AND RED CEDAR VALLEYS INC — $74,600 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY ST C…BOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC — $6,123 · Human ServicesBOLTON REFUGE H…FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER — $6,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT …EMBRACE SERVICES INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesEMBRACE SERVICE…TURNINGPOINT FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesTURNINGPOINT FO…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $34,250 · HealthAMERICAN CANC…BALDWIN AREA MEDICAL CENTER INC — $33,333 · HealthBALDWIN AREA …Chippewa Valley Health Cooperative — $10,000 · HealthChippewa Vall…MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · HealthMARSHFIELD CL…The Free Clinic of the Greater Menomonie Inc — $5,300 · HealthThe Free Clin…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · EducationCHIPPEWA VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $17,700 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - RIVER FALLS FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 · EducationHEALING PLAY INC — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsBARRON YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsST CROIX VALLEY FOUNDATION — $12,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF DUNN COUNTY INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE GREATER CHIPPEWA VALLEY INC — $5,835 · PhilanthropyOUR NEIGHBORS PLACE INC — $21,275 · Housing & Shelter
Other$418,345Human Services$98,723Health$88,883Education$50,200Recreation & Sports$35,000Philanthropy$28,335Housing & Shelter$21,275

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF DUNN COUNTY INC — $95,464 over 9y, 29% of budgetUNITED WAY ST CROIX AND RED CEDAR VALLEYS INC — $74,600 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetSTEPPING STONES OF DUNN COUNTY INC — $61,327 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetRIVER FALLS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $50,000 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $34,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBALDWIN AREA MEDICAL CENTER INC — $33,333 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWOOD TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetHEALING PLAY INC — $25,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetOUR NEIGHBORS PLACE INC — $21,275 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFIVE LOAVES FOOD & CLOTHING CENTER — $21,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHIPPEWA VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $17,700 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetST CROIX VALLEY FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRICE LAKE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC — $12,500 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - RIVER FALLS FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BRIDGE TO HOPE — $11,023 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetDUNN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetBARRON YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS-POST 10818 — $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF DUNN COUNTY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLE PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFILENE RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC — $6,123 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER — $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRACE SERVICES INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTURNINGPOINT FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE GREATER CHIPPEWA VALLEY INC — $5,835 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHIPPEWA VALLEY COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $5,400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Free Clinic of the Greater Menomonie Inc — $5,300 over 1y, 4.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Xcel Energy FoundationOtto Bremer TrustSt Croix Valley Found…Fred C and Katherine …Rcu Foundation IncGreen Bay Packers Fou…Eau Claire Community …Hugh J Andersen Found…Herbert H Kohl Charit…Andersen Corporate Fo…Land O'Lakes Foundati…Royal Credit Union
Xcel Energy FoundationMN39.4× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Xcel Energy Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · St Croix Valley Foundation · Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation · Rcu Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Eau Claire Community Foundation · Hugh J Andersen Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Andersen Corporate Foundation · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Royal Credit Union

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Westconsin Credit Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines