Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Wisconsin · Nonprofit

RICE LAKE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC

RICE LAKE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC (Wisconsin) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $267,844 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($205,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 95% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$406k
Revenue FY2026
4
Funders on record
$268k
Grants received
$1.5M
Net assets
2/4 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($127k) Expenses 100 ($135k) Net assets 100 ($961k)2018 Revenue 92 ($118k) Expenses 101 ($136k) Net assets 98 ($942k)2019 Revenue 141 ($179k) Expenses 138 ($187k) Net assets 97 ($934k)2020 Revenue 376 ($479k) Expenses 146 ($198k) Net assets 126 ($1.2M)2021 Revenue 147 ($187k) Expenses 126 ($170k) Net assets 128 ($1.2M)2022 Revenue 176 ($224k) Expenses 150 ($203k) Net assets 130 ($1.3M)2023 Revenue 188 ($239k) Expenses 180 ($244k) Net assets 130 ($1.2M)2024 Revenue 214 ($272k) Expenses 143 ($194k) Net assets 138 ($1.3M)2025 Revenue 231 ($294k) Expenses 167 ($226k) Net assets 145 ($1.4M)2026 Revenue 319 ($406k) Expenses 192 ($260k) Net assets 160 ($1.5M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Revenue (319)Expenses (192)Net assets (160)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 10 reported years ran a deficit.

$8k
17
$19k
18
$8k
19
$281k
20
$17k
21
$21k
22
$5k
23
$78k
24
$68k
25
$146k
26
6.4
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $205k → $9k.

3 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)95% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of RICE LAKE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

RICE LAKE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 77% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund RICE LAKE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC.

77%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 99% · 2021 99% · 2022 99% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

95% of RICE LAKE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $13k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Wisconsin funders.

WI

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $255k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like RICE LAKE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Wisconsin

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WI

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RICE LAKE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds RICE LAKE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC?
RICE LAKE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC (Wisconsin) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $267,844 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($205,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 95% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does RICE LAKE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $267,844 in grants to RICE LAKE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of RICE LAKE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC?
NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC is the largest funder on record, with $205,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like RICE LAKE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Wisconsin. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2026 (financials across 2017–2026), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing