Skip to content

· Public charity

Wenatchee Rotary Foundation Inc

The mission of the rotary foundation is to support the efforts of rotary international in the fulfillment of the object of rotary, rotarys mission, and the achievement of world understanding and peace through local, national, and international humanitarian, educational, and cultural programs.

$201k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$162k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$278kInternational$79kRecreation & Sports$50kHealth$29kEducation$27kCivil Rights$13kYouth Development$9kEnvironment$9k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $162,073, the rows itemized in this filing. The $201,389 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $39,316 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$162,073
Median grant
1
States reached
$729k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WENATCHEE VALLEY YMCA$162,073
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $283k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WENATCHEE VALLEY YMCA: $162k → 9%WENATCHEE VALLEY YMCA: $64k → 9%ALATHEIA: $29k → 9%CHELAN DOUGLAS COUNTY ACTION COUNCIL: $28k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

—
2
Wenatchee Valley Tread

We collaborate with diverse partners to drive sustainable outdoor recreation initiatives in north central washington. tread is committed to protecting and sustaining north central washington's outdoor spaces so future generations can…

Recreation & Sports
3
Cowlitz-Wahkiakum County Legal Aid Program Inc

Cowlitz Wahkiakum Legal Aid seeks to assure justice for low income people in the civil courts. We provide access to legal help for people whose livelihood, family and wellness are threatened.

Crime & Legal
4
Chelan Valley Hope

Chelan Valley Hope is a gross-roots local social services agency 'hub' for compassionate connections and resources since 2009. We empower people to improve their own lives by giving them a hand up; not just a hand-out. We do this by…

Human Services
5
Cheney Care Community

Cheney Care Community is a not for profit nursing home and assisted living facility that provides a high level of nursing care and retirement living to the elderly. Cheney provides care to medicaid, medicare, va and private residents…

Health
6
Chelan-Douglas Volunteer Attorney Services

We envision a thriving community where every person has fair and equitable access to justice. Our Mission is to bridge the justice gap by facilitating high-quality, equitable, and free civil legal services to people in Chelan and Douglas…

Crime & Legal
7
Center for Environmental Law & Policy

The Center for Environmental Law & Policy is a statewide organization whose mission is to protect, preserve and restore Washington's waters through education, advocacy, policy reform, and public interest litigation.

Environment
8
Wenatchee Valley Senior Activity Center

A private not-for-profit senior center organization that promotes the general welfare of older adults in the Wenatchee Valley through programs, services, activities, and facilities that provide a safe and healthful environment where…

Human Services
9
Re Sources

RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.

Environment
10
Children's Advocacy Centers of Washington

Children's advocacy centers of washington is a membership organization that provides support to communities that have formed or wish to form a children's advocacy center and promotes awareness of the incidence and impact of child abuse in…

Youth Development
11
Cowlitz Economic Development Council

Foster Growth in the Community

—
12
Wenatchee Downtown Association

The mission of the wda is to strengthen and enrich the downtown experience.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chelan-Douglas Land Trust; the most unlike its peers is Chelan- Douglas County Casagal. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WENATCHEE: $226,073 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WENATCHEEALATHEIA RIDING CENTER: $29,000 · Human ServicesALATHEIA RIDING CENTERCHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COU: $27,500 · Human ServicesCHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COURotary Club of Wenatchee WA USA Inc: $78,812 · OtherRotary Club of Wenatchee WA USA IncCITY OF WENATCHEE: $50,000 · OtherCITY OF WENATCHEESAGE ADVOCACY CENTER: $24,000 · OtherSAGE ADVOCACY CENTERCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NCW: $26,500 · PhilanthropyCHELAN- DOUGLAS COUNTY CASAGAL: $12,800 · Civil RightsCAMPFIRE USA NCW COUNCIL: $8,960 · Youth DevelopmentCHELAN-DOUGLAS LAND TRUST: $8,500 · Environment
Human Services$282,573Other$152,812Philanthropy$26,500Civil Rights$12,800Youth Development$8,960Environment$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WENATCHEE: $226,073 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetRotary Club of Wenatchee WA USA Inc: $78,812 over 3y, 25% of budgetALATHEIA RIDING CENTER: $29,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COU: $27,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAGE ADVOCACY CENTER: $24,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCHELAN- DOUGLAS COUNTY CASAGAL: $12,800 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCAMPFIRE USA NCW COUNCIL: $8,960 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCHELAN-DOUGLAS LAND TRUST: $8,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of NcwWA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Ncw · Confluence Health System · Names Family Foundation · United Way of Chelan & Douglas Counties Dba United Way of North Central Wa · Icicle Fund · Numerica Credit Union · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wenatchee Rotary Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wenatchee Rotary Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wenatchee Rotary’s filings →

    More from the funding graph