Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Chelan & Douglas Counties

United way of chelan and douglas counties creates a more educated, prosperous, and healthy community

$49k
Granted FY2019
4
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of UNITED WAY OF CHELAN & DOUGLAS COUNTIES DBA UNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL WA’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2019 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $41k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOBILE MEALS$15,000
SMALL MIRACLES$15,000
CHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL$11,000
LILAC SERVICES FOR THE BLIND$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WENATCHEE VALLEY YMCA: $29k → 9%CHELAN DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $22k → 9%CHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $11k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$111k · 4 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$111k
$153k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+36%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COU
    2× · 2017–2019 · $33k · revenue +194%
  • MM
    MOBILE MEALS
    2× · 2017–2019 · $32k · revenue +1%
  • SM
    SMALL MIRACLES
    2× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue -4%

Funded once

  • WR
    WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $45k · revenue +122%
  • SA
    SAGE ADVOCACY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $36k · revenue +28%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WENATCHEEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $29k · revenue +409%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lake Chelan Food Bank

The mission of Lake Chelan Food Bank is to treat each person we serve with dignity and respect and to provide balanced and varied options that give each person the liberty to meet the specific food needs for themsevles and/or their family.

Food & Nutrition
2
Westside Neighbor Network

An all volunteer cold weather emergency shelter, providing hot meals, overnight sleeping cots, shower, and laundry services to those in need in the west seattle/southwest corridor.

Human Services
3
Arc of Snohomish County

To serve individuals with developmental disabilities and their families

4
Wenatchee Valley Senior Activity Center

A private not-for-profit senior center organization that promotes the general welfare of older adults in the Wenatchee Valley through programs, services, activities, and facilities that provide a safe and healthful environment where…

Human Services
5
William a Burnard Warming Center

Our community recognizes the inherent dignity and worth of every human being by ensuring that no one spends a single night unsheltered and alone during winter months in Cache Valley.

Human Services
6
Northwest Washington Indian Health Board

Federal grants and contracts were used to provide direct community and public health services within Native American communities in Northwest Washington

7
Women & Children's Free Restaurant & Community Kitchen

We help meet the nutritional and social needs of low-income women and children in Spokane County by providing healthy meals at no charge at the restaurant and through partner agencies.

8
Willits Community Services Inc

The primary goal of Willits Community Services is to provide temporary assistance services to families and individuals in crisis. WCS also provides referrals to other community or regional resources and gives assistance to clients in…

Human Services
9
Valley Meals On Wheels Inc

To deliver meals to shut-ins who cannot or should not prepare meals for themselves.

Food & Nutrition
10
West Contra Costa County Meals On Wheels

Enable frail seniors to maintain their independence at home by providing them with high quality, nutritious meals that are cost effective, prepared in West Contra Costa County, delivered by caring drivers and administered by local…

Food & Nutrition
11
Read Northwest

Read Northwest exists to elevate Early Childhood Literacy in Southwest Washington.

Education
12
Central Washington Disability Resources

To advance the empowerment, inclusion, and wellness of all persons with disabilities through advocacy, community education, peer mentoring, and skill development so that they may realize independence and full participation in all areas of…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's Resource Center of North Central Washington and the most unlike its peers is Together for Youth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON — $45,000 · OtherWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTONSAGE ADVOCACY CENTER — $36,200 · OtherSAGE ADVOCACY CENTERMOBILE MEALS — $32,000 · OtherMOBILE MEALSCHELAN DOUGLAS CASA — $15,500 · OtherCHELAN DOUGLAS CASATogether For Youth — $10,000 · OtherTogether For YouthCHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COU — $33,000 · Human ServicesCHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY A…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WENATCHEE — $28,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSO…SMALL MIRACLES — $30,000 · HealthSMALL MIRACLESLILAC SERVICES FOR THE BLIND — $16,000 · HealthLILAC SERVICES FOR …CAMPFIRE USA NCW COUNCIL — $18,000 · Youth Development
Other$138,700Human Services$61,500Health$46,000Youth Development$18,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON — $45,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetSAGE ADVOCACY CENTER — $36,200 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COU — $33,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMOBILE MEALS — $32,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetSMALL MIRACLES — $30,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WENATCHEE — $28,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCAMPFIRE USA NCW COUNCIL — $18,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTogether For Youth — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of NcwWA24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Ncw · Numerica Credit Union · Wenatchee Rotary Foundation Inc · North Central Accountable Community of Health · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Chelan & Douglas Counties funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2021) is on record and reports $88 of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2019, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph