· Public charity
Water Buffalo Club Inc Dba We Benefit Children
Wbc is a charitable organization dedicated to fostering the well being of underserved and at-risk children in los angeles through its members' commitment of their time and financial resources.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $308,439 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $374,360 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $65,921 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $188k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $76k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MAKE GOOD | $75,900 |
| READY SET READ - COMMUNITY PARTNERS | $30,000 |
| FILM2FUTURE | $25,000 |
| HOPE IN A SUITCASE | $18,900 |
| PACTL | $14,989 |
| WHY CAN'T WE MAKE A DIFFERENCE | $14,200 |
| OFF THE WALL GRAFFITI | $12,537 |
| LEND A EAR | $10,920 |
| GET LIT | $10,750 |
| PICO YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER | $10,565 |
| VOLUNTEER LEAGUE OF SFV | $10,500 |
| ARTS BRIDGING THE GAP | $10,000 |
| GIVING A SMILE | $10,000 |
| VARIETY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $10,000 |
| UNITED VOICES OF LITERACY | $9,824 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $380k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ABACCESS BOOKS7× · 2017–2023 · $382k · revenue +92%
- MGMAKE GOOD INC5× · 2020–2024 · $329k · revenue +87%
- FFILM2FUTURE5× · 2020–2024 · $192k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- TJTHE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +164%
- FFFOUNDATION FOR LEARNING ATHLETICS AND GROWTHone grant, 2023 · $33k · revenue +5% · 27% of their budget
- CHCITY HEARTS KIDS SAY YES TO THE ARTS LA FRINGE THEATRE INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $28k · revenue +41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Inner-city arts believes that the arts and creativity are transformational, and we envision a society that honors the human capacity for creativity, and values its cultivation in the education of young people. inner-city arts uses arts…
Los Angeles Team Mentorings (LATM) mission is to guide middle school students growing up in challenging urban environments to recognize and reach their full potential. See Schedule O for more details.
To make positive interventions in the lives of young people by offering alternatives to gangs and violence. legacy la builds the capacity of youth to reach their full potential and equips them with tools to transform their lives and…
Life pieces to masterpieces (lptm) is dedicated to the creative, academic, social-emotional, physical, and citizenship development of black boys and young men living in washington d.c.'s underserved 7th and 8th wards. founded in 1996, lptm…
Urban Compass provides a safe, welcoming, and innovative environment that challenges our youth to envision and navigate a course for a rewarding future characterized by achievement, independent thought, and social responsibility through…
Provide resources, education and services to the underserved African-American youth population in Los Angeles.
Da Vinci Schools: LA County consists of a public charter school, RISE High, which exists to provide our students an individualized education through the coalescence of their personal and professional goals, their interests, and the…
Street poets, inc. is an arts education violence prevention program for system-impacted youth and young adults in the probation facilities and under-served school communities of los angeles county (and occasionally beyond). the program is…
Boys 2 Gentlemen Leadership, Inc.'s mission is to deliver a continuum of prevention, assessment, intervention, and treatment to at-risk boys/girls by assisting in cultivating new dreams. We will empower them to create a roadmap to make…
Working with families and youth to create pathway out of poverty.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Phenomenal Angels of the Community and the most unlike its peers is You Run This Town Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ACCESS BOOKS ↗
- Who funds MAKE GOOD INC ↗
- Who funds FILM2FUTURE ↗
- Who funds THE LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE IN A SUITCASE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY TRUST FUND OF VOLUNTEER LEAGUE OF SAN FERNANDO VALLEY ↗
- Who funds Why Cant We Make A Difference ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BOOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds J TECH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds READING TO KIDS ↗
- Who funds HANDS FOR HOPE ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR LEARNING ATHLETICS AND GROWTH ↗
- Who funds CITY HEARTS KIDS SAY YES TO THE ARTS LA FRINGE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATING STUDENTS TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds Urban Scholar Academy ↗
- Who funds PASADENA - FOOTHILL VALLEY YWCA ↗
- Who funds DANCE AND DIALOGUE ↗
- Who funds AMERICA SCORES LA ↗
- Who funds INNER CITY YOUTH ORCHRSTRA OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY AND AMERICAN GREATNESS ↗
- Who funds PICO YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN DEBATE COMMISSION ↗
- Who funds ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ONCE UPON A ROOM INC ↗
- Who funds 40 LOVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds EMPOWHER INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds AWOKE ↗
- Who funds A CHANCE FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS MUSIC FUND ↗
- Who funds BETTER ANGELS INC ↗
- Who funds PHENOMENAL ANGELS OF THE COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds SHEROS RISE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Muskin Family Foundation · Perenchio Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Women Helping Youth · Frieda C Fox Family Foundation · Joseph Drown Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · Community Partners
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Water Buffalo Club Inc Dba We Benefit Children funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Water Buffalo Club Inc Dba We Benefit Children?
Find your warmest path to Water Buffalo Club Inc Dba We Benefit Children through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.