· Private foundation
Frieda C Fox Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $135k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| TIA CHUCHA'S CENTRAL CULTURAL | $15,000 |
| YOUNG STORYTELLERS | $15,000 |
| UNCOMMON GOOD | $10,000 |
| LAS FOTOS PROJECT | $10,000 |
| YOUTH MENTORING ACTION NETWORK | $10,000 |
| CENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERS | $10,000 |
| SAVING INNOCENCE | $10,000 |
| ONE GENERATION | $10,000 |
| LOS ANGELES ROOM BOARD | $10,000 |
| SOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INST | $10,000 |
| LOS ANGELES METRO DEBATE COMM | $10,000 |
| BUSINESS OF STUDENT SUCCESS | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| OLASTEO | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ABACCESS BOOKS3× · 2019–2022 · $45k · revenue +48%
- CCCENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERS3× · 2021–2024 · $34k · revenue +157%
- SISAVING INNOCENCE INC4× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +71%
Funded once
- FCFOUNDATON CENTERone grant, 2017 · $25k
- FIFEAST Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +100%
- FNFOSTER NATIONone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.
To make positive interventions in the lives of young people by offering alternatives to gangs and violence. legacy la builds the capacity of youth to reach their full potential and equips them with tools to transform their lives and…
Youth policy institute (ypi) transforms los angeles neighborhoods, reducing poverty by offering cradle to college & career services.
Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…
The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…
Youth Emerging Stronger (YES) empowers young people, between ages of 12 and 24 within Los Angeles County, including but not limited to run-away and homeless youth. YES mission is to end homelessness one youth at a time to become…
Los Angeles Team Mentorings (LATM) mission is to guide middle school students growing up in challenging urban environments to recognize and reach their full potential. See Schedule O for more details.
Inner-city arts believes that the arts and creativity are transformational, and we envision a society that honors the human capacity for creativity, and values its cultivation in the education of young people. inner-city arts uses arts…
Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…
La's best provides free supervised before and after-school activities to over 15,000 children at 200 schools in los angeles unified school district (lausd).
To advance educational equity. together with families, schools and the community, facilitate access to and opportunities for quality educational and wellness practices so that children thrive from diapers to diplomas.
Hack the Hood provides youth and communities of color with tech skill-building programs and career navigation support that are grounded in justice and ensure economic mobility.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Place for Youth Inc and the most unlike its peers is Access Books. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNCOMMON GOOD ↗
- Who funds ACCESS BOOKS ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds SAVING INNOCENCE INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds FEAST Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUNG STORYTELLERS ↗
- Who funds EMPOWHER INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds The Leaders Readers Network ↗
- Who funds FOSTER NATION ↗
- Who funds READING TO KIDS ↗
- Who funds SHIELDS FOR FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds TIA CHUCHA'S CENTRO CULTURAL INC ↗
- Who funds ONEGENERATION ↗
- Who funds GET LIT - WORDS IGNITE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH MENTORING ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds GIRLS TODAY WOMEN TOMORROW ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS ↗
- Who funds WOODCRAFT RANGERS ↗
- Who funds John Burton Advocates for Youth ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE BUILDERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DREAM A WORLD EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds CASA YOUTH SHELTER ↗
- Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds The Village Family Services Inc ↗
- Who funds TAKING THE REINS ↗
- Who funds KHMER GIRLS IN ACTION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Crail-Johnson Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Carrie Estelle Doheny Foundation · Ccf Community Initiatives Fund · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Frieda C Fox Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Frieda C Fox Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Frieda C Fox Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.