Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Walter & Donna Conn Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$396k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$947kHuman Services$509kHealth$308kEducation$293kYouth Development$46kArts & Culture$13kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $248k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ANNE'S$90,000
SOCIETY DEVOTED TO SACRED HEART$85,000
CARMELITE SISTERS OF THE MOST SACRED HEART$72,500
MAYFIELD SENIOR SCHOOL$25,000
THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE$20,000
CARMELITE MONASTERY$20,000
CHMC FOUNDATION$20,000
GONZAGA UNIVERSITY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SISTERS OF SOCIAL SERVICES$10,000
SANTA TERESITA$10,000
WALL LAS MEMORIAS$7,500
CHILD FUND$2,500
FIVE ACRES$2,500
GARDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $411k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Drew Child Development: $600 → 14%St Anne's: $125k → 14%ST ANNE'S: $90k → 14%St Anne's: $65k → 14%St Anne's: $40k → 14%St Anne's: $40k → 14%St Anne's: $30k → 14%St Anne's: $15k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES LOS ANGELES: $3k → 14%US Vets: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 15 repeat orgs$238k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$2.3M
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+32%

Still filing today

47%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    St Anne's Family Services
    7× · 2019–2025 · $405k · revenue +63%
  • TA
    THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $145k · revenue +35%
  • CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • CS
    Carmelite Sisters of the Most Sacre
    one grant, 2024 · $73k
  • DE
    Dr Ehresmann's ResrchUSC Advancemt
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • ST
    St Thomas University
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Hillsides

We are a premier provider dedicated to healing children and young adults, strengthening families, and transforming communities through quality comprehensive services and advocacy. we envision a world in which children and young adults,…

Human Services
3
Sacramento Children's Home

At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.

Human Services
4
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
5
Hathaway-Sycamores Child and Family Services

Sycamores nonprofit health organization whose mission is cultivating hope and resilience to enrich the well-being of children, families, and communities through out los angeles and riverside counties.

Human Services
6
Edgewood Center for Children and Families

To be the place to begin for all bay area children, youth and families who need mental health, social services and academic support. edgewood is the premier provider of a full continuum of behavioral health services that transform the…

Health
7
Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness

Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…

Human Services
8
Achievekids

Achievekids schools provide individualized and multi-disciplinary programs that deliver special education, mental health, and family support services for students ages 5 to 22 who have complex and often severe developmental, emotional, and…

Education
9
Union Station Homeless Services

We work to end homelessness through housing solutions, supportive services, and connection to community. we advocate for equitable and just systems that ensure all individuals and families will have a safe place they can call home.

Human Services
10
Family Service Agency of Santa Barbara County

The mission of family service agency is to strengthen and advocate for families and individuals of all ages and diversities, helping to create and preserve a healthy community.

Human Services
11
Palo Alto University Inc

Advancing human understanding through education, research, and practice in behavioral science

Education
12
Stanford Youth Solutions dba Stanford Sierra Youth & Families

To help solve the most challenging issues facing youth and families in northern california by providing tailored services from counseling and therapy to alternative placements with an end result of permanently connecting our young clients…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Los Angeles Inc and the most unlike its peers is United States Veterans Initiative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Society Devoted to Sacred Heart — $600,000 · OtherSociety Devoted to Sacred HeartIndividual grant recipient — $445,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHMC Foundation — $217,500 · OtherCHMC FoundationCarmelite Monastery — $195,000 · OtherCarmelite MonasteryCarmelite Sisters of the Most Sacre — $72,500 · OtherCARMELITE SISTERS OF THE MOST SACRED HEART — $72,500 · OtherSANTA TERESITA INC — $70,000 · Other+14 more — $162,500 · Other+14 moreSt Anne's Family Services — $405,000 · Human ServicesSt Anne's Family S…+4 more — $18,600 · Human ServicesTHOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE — $145,000 · EducationTHOMAS AQUI…CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $95,000 · EducationCORPORATION…PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE — $10,000 · EducationHIGHER GROUND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $32,500 · Youth DevelopmentWALL-LAS MEMORIAS PROJECT — $27,500 · Health
Other$1,835,000Human Services$423,600Education$250,000Youth Development$32,500Health$27,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSt Anne's Family Services — $405,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE — $145,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $95,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA TERESITA INC — $70,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHIGHER GROUND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $32,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetWALL-LAS MEMORIAS PROJECT — $27,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetKARE YOUTH LEAGUE — $13,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDREW CHILD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds St Anne's Family Services
  • Who funds THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SANTA TERESITA INC
  • Who funds HIGHER GROUND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds WALL-LAS MEMORIAS PROJECT
  • Who funds KARE YOUTH LEAGUE
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE
  • Who funds UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC
  • Who funds Five Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County
  • Who funds GARDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DREW CHILD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Rose Hills Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Walter & Donna Conn Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Walter & Donna Conn Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Walter & Donna Conn Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph