Skip to content

· Private foundation

Walbridge Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$174k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$438kPublic Benefit$195kFood & Nutrition$176kYouth Development$163kAnimals$123kHealth$123kReligion$95kInternational$72kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $145k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE CHEAT RIVER$25,000
FCNL EDUCATION FUND$25,000
TRI-STATE BIRD RESCUE AND RESEARCH$20,000
HOLT ELWELL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$15,000
HOMEOPATHS WITHOUT BORDERS$15,000
AMERICAN WHITEWATER$15,000
PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIAITON FOR$10,000
ISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE$10,000
A SPRING OF HOPE$10,000
THE FINGER LAKES LAND TRUST INC$5,000
FOOD BANK OF SOURTHERN TIER$5,000
PENDLE HILL$5,000
BROOKS SCHOOL$5,000
WEST VIRGINA LAND TRUST INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $4k → 9%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $4k → 9%MITZVAH CIRCLE: $10k → 7%MITZVAH CIRCLE: $5k → 7%MITZVAH CIRCLE: $5k → 7%MITZVAH CIRCLE: $5k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $5k → 22%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $2k → 22%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $6k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
PA
WV
DE
AZ
AR
NC
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Walbridge Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Walbridge Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 25 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against -27% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
11

Total granted

$1.4M
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
-27%

Still filing today

68%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentFood & NutritionHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    HOLT-ELWELL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OPERATING CAMP MOWGLIS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $138k · revenue +71%
  • AW
    American Whitewater
    9× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +44%
  • HW
    HOMEOPATHS WITHOUT BORDERS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $89k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • WT
    WISSAHICKON TRAILS
    one grant, 2022 · $45k
  • MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue ×11
  • IF
    ISLAND FOOD PANTRY OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD INC
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
2
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
3
Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition
4
Food Connect Co

At food connect, we're dedicated to bridging the gaps in our food system, working to end hunger and fostering healthier communities through our innovative initiatives and programs. we build scalable technologies that support last-mile…

Food & Nutrition
5
Field & Fork Network

Field & fork network connects communities to innovative solutions that foster a sustainable food system. the 4 areas of focus include: food access, agriculture economic development, youth development and healthy neighborhoods.

—
6
Franklin Land Trust Inc

The franklin land trust works to conserve farms, forests, wildlands, and other natural resources significant to the quality of the environment, economy, and rural character of western massachusetts.

Environment
7
The Food Alliance

Food alliance works at the juncture of science, business and values to define and promote sustainability in agriculture and the food industry, and to ensure safe and fair working conditions, humane treatment of animals, and careful…

Arts & Culture
8
Westchester Land Trust Inc

The primary mission of the Westchester Land Trust is to conserve, maintain and enhance the natural environment and resources of Westchester County and eastern Putnam County. The Trust acquires interests in land exhibiting important natural…

Environment
9
Maine Appalachian Trail Land Trust

To preserve and protect land surrounding the appalachian trail in maine for public benefit.

Environment
10
The Central New York Land Trust Inc

The central new york land trust seeks to preserve and protect natural areas in order to provide our communities clean water, clean air, wildlife habitat, and a chance to connect with the land.

Environment
11
Coastal Mountains Land Trust

We conserve land permanently to benefit the natural and human communities of western the Penobscot Bay region.

Environment
12
Food Bank of Central New York

Food bank of central new york is a not-for-profit organization: our mission is to lead the effort to eliminate hunger in our region, through partnerships with others in our community, through education, advocacy, and distribution of…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cradles to Crayons Inc; the most unlike its peers is Homeopaths Without Borders. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE CHEAT RIVER WATERSHED: $163,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE CHEAT RIVER WATERSHEDST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF WHITEMARSH: $70,000 · OtherST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF WHITEMARSHTRI-STATE BIRD RESCUE: $70,000 · OtherTRI-STATE BIRD RESCUEPendle Hill: $45,000 · OtherPendle HillWISSAHICKON TRAILS: $45,000 · OtherWISSAHICKON TRAILSBRAVO THEATRE COMPANY: $35,850 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE CHEAT RIVER: $25,000 · OtherTRI-STATE BIRD RESCUE AND RESEARCH INC: $43,000 · OtherTRI-STATE BIRD RESCUE AND RESEARCH INCMITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Other+17 more: $154,500 · Other+17 moreAmerican Whitewater: $135,000 · EnvironmentAmerican Whitewate…The Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc: $58,000 · EnvironmentThe Finger Lakes L…THE WEST VIRGINIA LAND TRUST INC: $42,500 · EnvironmentTHE WEST VIRGINIA …SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $9,000 · Environment+1 more: $5,000 · EnvironmentFCNL EDUCATION FUND: $195,000 · Public BenefitFCNL EDUCATION…HOLT-ELWELL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OPERATING CAMP MOWGLIS: $137,500 · Recreation & SportsHOLT-ELWEL…ISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD: $55,750 · Food & NutritionISLAND GR…PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE: $30,000 · Food & NutritionPENNSYLVA…METROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $22,500 · Food & NutritionMETROPOLI…FRIENDSHIP DONATIONS NETWORK: $17,750 · Food & NutritionFRIENDSHI…HOMEOPATHS WITHOUT BORDERS: $88,500 · Health+2 more: $6,000 · HealthA SPRING OF HOPE INC: $71,500 · International+1 more: $500 · International
Other$676,350Environment$249,500Public Benefit$195,000Recreation & Sports$137,500Food & Nutrition$126,000Health$94,500International$72,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFCNL EDUCATION FUND: $195,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetHOLT-ELWELL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OPERATING CAMP MOWGLIS: $137,500 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetAmerican Whitewater: $135,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetHOMEOPATHS WITHOUT BORDERS: $88,500 over 9y, 13% of budgetA SPRING OF HOPE INC: $71,500 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetThe Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc: $58,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD: $55,750 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPendle Hill: $45,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTRI-STATE BIRD RESCUE AND RESEARCH INC: $43,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHE WEST VIRGINIA LAND TRUST INC: $42,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $22,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE SOUTHERN FINGER LAKES INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDSHIP DONATIONS NETWORK: $17,750 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetBROOKS SCHOOL: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetISLAND FOOD PANTRY OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD INC: $5,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJACKS GALORE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCOCONINO COUNTY HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWissahickon Valley Watershed Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetITHACA HEALTH ALLIANCE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPILLARS OF LIGHT AND LOVE: $3,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FCNL EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds HOLT-ELWELL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OPERATING CAMP MOWGLIS ↗
  • Who funds American Whitewater ↗
  • Who funds HOMEOPATHS WITHOUT BORDERS ↗
  • Who funds A SPRING OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD ↗
  • Who funds Pendle Hill ↗
  • Who funds TRI-STATE BIRD RESCUE AND RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WEST VIRGINIA LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE ↗
  • Who funds MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE SOUTHERN FINGER LAKES INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP DONATIONS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds BROOKS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND FOOD PANTRY OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD INC ↗
  • Who funds JACKS GALORE INC ↗
  • Who funds COCONINO COUNTY HUMANE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Wissahickon Valley Watershed Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ITHACA HEALTH ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds PILLARS OF LIGHT AND LOVE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA11.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walbridge Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walbridge Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • American Whitewater: 5% of income from government
  • Tri-State Bird Rescue and Research Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Island Grown Initiative Ltd: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Walbridge Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph