Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education.

$162M
Granted FY2025still arriving
117
Grants FY2025still arriving
38
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Science & Tech$21MHealth$9.7MArts & Culture$6.3MEducation$4.0MReligion$1.1MCommunity Improvement$519kHuman Services$271kPhilanthropy$253kOther$0
02FY2025 · 117 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 117 grants below total $17,210,416 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $161,601,582 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $144,391,166 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k47 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k37 grants · $2.8M
  • $250k+25 grants · $13M
$50,000
Median grant
38
States reached
$3.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Reynolda House Inc$1,346,455
Wake Forest Univ Health Sciences$1,308,253
UNC Chapel Hill$940,591
The Regents of the University of Colorado$734,427
Brigham & Women's Hospital$603,639
Montclair State University$507,500
Virginia Tech$500,000
Purdue University$500,000
University of Virginia$500,000
Catholic University of America The$500,000
University of Notre Dame$500,000
Arizona State University$500,000
University of Mississippi The$500,000
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania$420,400
Belmont University$400,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $800k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Inspiration and Change Inc: $54k → 11%Metropolitan Charities Inc: $100k → 12%Foundations for Living: $60k → 7%Helping Everyone Receive Ongoing Effective Support: $25k → 21%Inspiration and Change Inc: $25k → 11%Metropolitan Charities Inc: $100k → 12%Foundations for Living: $50k → 7%Miracle of Love Inc: $50k → 13%Hight Impacto Inc: $45k → 13%Senior Services Inc: $10k → 15%Foundations for Living: $10k → 7%Miracle of Love Inc: $25k → 13%Hight Impacto Inc: $25k → 13%Freedom Center for Social Justice: $75k → 10%Miracle of Love Inc: $25k → 13%Miracle of Love Inc: $25k → 13%Afiya Center: $25k → 14%YMCA of Northwest NC: $66k → 15%YWCA of Winston-Salem: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$31M · 86 repeat orgs$9.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

86 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 62 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

86
73

Total granted

$31M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+9%

Still filing today

64%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES
    7× · 2019–2025 · $6.9M · revenue +64%
  • RH
    REYNOLDA HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.9M · revenue +5%
  • CM
    Carnegie Mellon University
    6× · 2019–2024 · $581k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • DB
    DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $229k · revenue +18%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FORENSIC ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $135k · revenue +52%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $103k · revenue +33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
7
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
8
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
9
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
10
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
11
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
12
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Campbell University and the most unlike its peers is Love & Hope Fellowship Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLgbtq+ Community SupportCommunity Arts CentersHealth Access Advocacy and …Christian Missionary Organi…United Way AffiliatesImmigrant Worker SupportFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Banks and PantriesAffordable Housing Construc…Community College Foundatio…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%45%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%68%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/229
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,336

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

163 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 163 of the 229 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
159/163
Grantees still filing
72/163
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $6,938,653 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCESTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $867,320 · Education+70 more — $9,413,335 · Education+70 moreUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $3,534,506 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO — $1,297,423 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADOMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $1,220,071 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY — $590,165 · OtherRECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA — $587,977 · OtherCarnegie Mellon University — $580,994 · Other+88 more — $9,079,971 · Other+88 moreREYNOLDA HOUSE INC — $5,903,811 · Arts & CultureREYNOLDA HOUSE I…NORTH CAROLINA BLACK REPERTORY COMPANY INC — $220,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more — $243,332 · Arts & CultureINTERFAITH AMERICA — $350,000 · ReligionTHE VISION COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO — $257,143 · ReligionRESOURCE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND MINISTRY IN THE SOUTH INC — $100,000 · ReligionSAMUEL DEWITT PROCTOR CONFERENCE INC — $100,000 · ReligionLOVE & HOPE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH — $35,000 · Religion+2 more — $50,000 · ReligionMetropolitan Charities Inc — $200,000 · Human ServicesMIRACLE OF LOVE INC — $125,000 · Human ServicesFOUNDATIONS FOR LIVING INC — $120,000 · Human ServicesCOMPASSIONATE ATLANTA INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesINSPIRATION AND CHANGE INC — $78,571 · Human ServicesFreedom Center for Social Justice — $75,000 · Human ServicesHIGHT IMPACTO INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of Northwest North Carolina (4626) — $66,330 · Human Services+2 more — $50,000 · Human ServicesBROWN UNIVERSITY — $138,065 · Community ImprovementRelationship Unleashed — $120,000 · Community ImprovementTOGETHER FOR HOPE — $100,000 · Community ImprovementPIEDMONT TRIAD PARTNERSHIP — $90,000 · Community ImprovementFABRIC — $68,571 · Community ImprovementGREATER WINSTON-SALEM DEVELOPMENT CORP — $45,000 · Community ImprovementAbyssinian Community Services — $25,000 · Community ImprovementThe Winston-Salem Foundation — $512,340 · PhilanthropyNEIGHBORS FOR BETTER NEIGHBORHOODS — $30,000 · Philanthropy
Education$17,219,308Other$16,891,107Arts & Culture$6,367,143Religion$892,143Human Services$884,901Community Improvement$586,636Philanthropy$542,340

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $6,938,653 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetREYNOLDA HOUSE INC — $5,903,811 over 9y, 24% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $867,320 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University — $580,994 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA — $517,811 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Winston-Salem Foundation — $512,340 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH MISSISSIPPI EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC — $500,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $436,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE — $400,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBelmont University — $400,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $400,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERFAITH AMERICA — $350,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY — $333,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $316,632 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMPBELL UNIVERSITY — $300,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe University of Tulsa — $300,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $295,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY — $291,023 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $272,288 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYale University — $269,038 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST COLLEGE BIRTHPLACE SOCIETY INC — $260,618 over 4y, 69% of budgetTHE VISION COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO — $257,143 over 4y, 19% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $252,754 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHEATON COLLEGE — $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $228,880 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA BLACK REPERTORY COMPANY INC — $220,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $209,738 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMetropolitan Charities Inc — $200,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTuskegee University — $195,161 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC — $175,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOld North State Medical Society — $166,563 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $138,065 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $134,281 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMIRACLE OF LOVE INC — $125,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetKING UNIVERSITY — $125,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRelationship Unleashed — $120,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetFOUNDATIONS FOR LIVING INC — $120,000 over 3y, 54% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $111,236 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF FORSYTH COUNTY INC — $110,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $103,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLD HICKORY COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $100,836 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $100,781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSIONATE ATLANTA INC — $100,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetRESOURCE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND MINISTRY IN THE SOUTH INC — $100,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetSAMUEL DEWITT PROCTOR CONFERENCE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF FORSYTH COUNTY INC — $93,250 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPIEDMONT TRIAD PARTNERSHIP — $90,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES
  • Who funds REYNOLDA HOUSE INC
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University
  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA
  • Who funds The Winston-Salem Foundation
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds NORTH MISSISSIPPI EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC
  • Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE
  • Who funds Belmont University
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds INTERFAITH AMERICA
  • Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds The University of Tulsa
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • Who funds WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds University of Chicago
  • Who funds Yale University
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST COLLEGE BIRTHPLACE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds THE VISION COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
  • Who funds WHEATON COLLEGE
  • Who funds DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Collegiate Athletic AssociationIN33.6× affinity16 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · AIDS United · Emory University · Reynolds American Foundation · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Twin City Development Foundation · North Carolina Baptist Hospital · Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc · Folds of Honor Foundation · American Council of Learned Societies · Foundation for the Carolinas · Triangle Community Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wake Forest University funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Yale University12% of income from government
  • Hued Songs Inc12% of income from government
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc11% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
  • Brandeis University9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
  • Florida Institute of Technology Inc5% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa5% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Charities Inc4% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College3% of income from government
  • George Fox University2% of income from government
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University2% of income from government
  • Ramapo College Foundation1% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University1% of income from government
  • Wheaton College0% of income from government
  • Stonehill College Inc0% of income from government
  • Miracle of Love Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
33report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 229 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph