· Private foundation
Healthspark Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $55k
- $10k–50k31 grants · $757k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $83k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRICOUNTY COMMUNITY NETWORK | $82,750 |
| ACLAMO FAMILY CENTERS | $45,000 |
| CENTRO DE CULTURA ARTE TRABAJO Y EDUCACION (CCATE) | $45,000 |
| POTTSTOWN BEACON OF HOPE | $42,500 |
| THE WELCOME PROJECT PA | $40,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA (DBA INTER-FAITH HOUSING ALLIANCE) | $35,000 |
| ACCESS SERVICES | $35,000 |
| SEACHANGE CAPITAL PARTNERS INC | $30,000 |
| BUCKS-MONT COLLABORATIVE | $30,000 |
| BE REZILIENT HEALING THROUGH THE ARTS | $29,000 |
| GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER COMMUNITY CENTER | $20,000 |
| THE STRIVE INITIATIVE INC | $20,000 |
| CEASEFIREPA | $20,000 |
| HOUSING ALLIANCE OF PENNSYLVANIA | $20,000 |
| THEATRE HORIZON | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $611k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 11% of Healthspark Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 84% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
52 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $189k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PHPENNSYLVANIA HEALTH ACCESS NETWORK6× · 2019–2024 · $573k · revenue +52%
- TCTRICOUNTY COMMUNITY NETWORK INC7× · 2019–2025 · $395k · revenue +59%
- ASACCESS SERVICES INC5× · 2020–2025 · $258k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- MAMONTCO ANTI-HUNGER NETWORKone grant, 2022 · $83k · revenue -31%
Philabundancegraduatedone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +83%- I(INTERNEWS (VOICES FOR CHANGE)one grant, 2022 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Accessmatters' mission is to protect, expand, and enhance access to sexual and reproductive health care and information for all people. accessmatters fulfills its mission by providing services and information directly to people, by…
Public health management corporation (phmc) is a nonprofit public health institute that creates and sustains healthier communities. phmc uses best practices to improve community health through direct service, partnership, innovation,…
Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…
The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.
Driving change from the ground up, the urban affairs coalition (uac) unites government, business, neighborhoods, and individual initiatives to improve the quality of life in the region, build wealth in urban communities, and solve emerging…
The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…
The mission of pennsylvania women work is to empower women to advance in their careers and achieve self-sufficiency through life-changing career development programs and mentorship.
See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…
Vision for equality works each day to serve, support and empower individuals with intellectual disabilities and their families bringing to them the information and tools they need to create the life of meaning they want and to successfully…
As a private non-profit health and human services organization, maternal and family health services (mfhs) works to meet the health and nutrition needs of northeastern pennsylvania's women, children, and families with essential…
Enforcing and protecting the rights of individuals and families by providing accessible, creative, and high quality legal assistance and working collaboratively for systemic change.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maternal and Child Health Consortium of Chester County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Independence Public Media of Philadelphia Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH ACCESS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds TRICOUNTY COMMUNITY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BUCKS-MONT COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds THE PHILIP JAISOHN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ACLAMO ↗
- Who funds Maternity Care Coalition ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS ON THE MAIN LINE INC ↗
- Who funds MANNA ON MAIN STREET ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA ↗
- Who funds MONTCO ANTI-HUNGER NETWORK ↗
- Who funds SHARE FOOD PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION KIDS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Catholic Social Services ↗
- Who funds WELCOME PROJECT PA ↗
- Who funds SEACHANGE CAPITAL PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds Philabundance ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA ↗
- Who funds THEATRE HORIZON INC ↗
- Who funds George Washington Carver Community Center ↗
- Who funds I CHOOSE TO WIN ↗
- Who funds POTTSTOWN BEACON OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENCE PUBLIC MEDIA OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds SENIOR ADULT ACTIVITIES CENTER OF MONTGO ↗
- Who funds DEAF HEARING COMMUNICATION CENTRE ↗
- Who funds KB FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The STRIVE Initiative Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Montgomery County Foundation Inc · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Vna Foundation of Greater North Penn · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Genuardi Family Foundation · The Leo and Peggy Pierce Family Foundation Inc · Pottstown Regional Community Foundation Fka Pottstown Area Health and Wellness · Independence Foundation · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Connelly Foundation · Claneil Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Healthspark Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.