Skip to content
Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc

Vitamin angels helps at-risk populations in need, specifically pregnant women, new mothers and children under five, gain access to life changing micronutrients.

$127M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$762kInternational$10kHuman Services$10k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $126,692,550 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $126,682,550 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$146M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOU NOUVO NEW DAY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JOU NOUVO NEW DAY: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
PA
CT
CA
AZ
SC
DC
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $120M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$79M · 66% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: NUTRITION · DEWORMING

East Asia and the Pacific$23M · 19% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: NUTRITION · DEWORMING

Central America and the Caribbean$8.8M · 7% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: NUTRITION · DEWORMING

South Asia$4.1M · 3% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: NUTRITION · DEWORMING

North America (Canada and Mexico)$2.7M · 2% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: NUTRITION · DEWORMING

Middle East and North Africa$2.0M · 2% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: NUTRITION · DEWORMING

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$127k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: OPERATIONS

South America$15k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: NUTRITION

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$418k · 3 repeat orgs$364k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$418k
$354k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+42%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHealthEducationInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH PROGRAMS INCORPORATED
    3× · 2021–2023 · $236k · revenue +42%
  • CI
    Central Illinois Foodbank Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $135k · revenue -13%
  • CB
    Community Bridges
    2× · 2022–2023 · $47k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • MF
    Micronutrient Forum
    one grant, 2023 · $145k · revenue -25%
  • IT
    INTER TRIBAL COUNCIL OF ARIZONA INCgraduated
    5× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +56%
  • FH
    FAMILY HEALTH COUNCIL OF CENTRAL PA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +49%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life Choices Pregnancy Care Center Inc

The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…

Health
2
A Woman's Choice

Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.

—
3
Lifechoice Pregnancy Care Center

To provide support to unplanned pregnancies.

—
4
Birthchoice

Consulting for pregnant women. community service referrals.

—
5
Life Choices Medical Clinic

Help women who are pregnant by giving them options to save their baby.

Unclassified
6
Willow Womens Center

The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.

Human Services
7
Life Choices Care Center

To provide support for pregnant women

Health
8
Pregnancy Care Center Inc Dba Life Choices Clinic

Acknowledging that every human life begins at conception and is worthy of protection, Life Choices Clinic offers compassion, hope, and help to anyone considering abortion by presenting them with realistic alternatives and Christ-centered…

Health
9
Alternatives Pregnancy Center

It is our mission to provide women with medical care and alternatives to abortion as we proclaim the hope of the Gospel.

—
10
Wise Choices Pregnancy Resource Center Inc

Assistance to pregnant women in crisis, offering free pregnancy tests, ultrasounds, sti testing, counseling, education and referrals to aid the mother and father as advocates for the unborn. we empower life affirming choices.

Human Services
11
Choices for Women Resource Center Inc

Choices life resource center exists to glorify god by saving babies and empowering families to share in the abundant life god has offered to all his creation. we do this by providing educational opportunities, giving practical support, and…

Human Services
12
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pregnancy Aid Clinic Inc; the most unlike its peers is Womens Resource Center of Natc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

195 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
72
Early backer (in before they grew)
191/195
Grantees still filing
156/195
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY HEALTH PROGRAMS INCORPORATED: $235,610 · OtherCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROGRAMS INCORPORATEDINTER TRIBAL COUNCIL OF ARIZONA INC: $80,315 · OtherINTER TRIBAL COUNCIL OF ARIZONA INCLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $12,350 · OtherCentral Illinois Foodbank Inc: $135,350 · Food & NutritionCentral Illinois Foodbank …Community Bridges: $47,335 · Food & NutritionCommunity BridgesMicronutrient Forum: $145,000 · EducationMicronutrient ForumFAMILY HEALTH COUNCIL OF CENTRAL PA INC: $75,000 · HealthFAMILY HEALTH C…OKEECHOBEE COUNTY HEALTHOKEECHOBEE HEALTHY START COALITION INC: $31,250 · HealthOKEECHOBEE COUN…Jou Nouvo - New Day Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · International
Other$328,275Food & Nutrition$182,685Education$145,000Health$106,250Human Services$10,000International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROGRAMS INCORPORATED: $235,610 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMicronutrient Forum: $145,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCentral Illinois Foodbank Inc: $135,350 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetINTER TRIBAL COUNCIL OF ARIZONA INC: $80,315 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH COUNCIL OF CENTRAL PA INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCommunity Bridges: $47,335 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOKEECHOBEE COUNTY HEALTHOKEECHOBEE HEALTHY START COALITION INC: $31,250 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $12,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJou Nouvo - New Day Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Knights of Columbus C…Mission Pre-Born IncCare NetSave the Storks4 USFlorida K of C Charit…Direct ReliefCouncil for LifeFlorida Pregnancy Car…Vitamin BridgeAmericares Foundation…Essential Access Heal…
Knights of Columbus Charities IncCT85.5× affinity54 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Mission Pre-Born Inc · Care Net · Save the Storks · 4 US · Florida K of C Charities Inc · Direct Relief · Council for Life · Florida Pregnancy Care Network Inc · Vitamin Bridge · Americares Foundation Inc · Essential Access Health

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Community Health Programs Incorporated: 13% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vitamin Angel Alliance’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home