Skip to content

· Private foundation

Virginia Friedhofer Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$581k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$636kArts & Culture$520kScience & Tech$493kEducation$310kAnimals$245kFood & Nutrition$240kEnvironment$101kInternational$90kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $320k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION$100,000
UC BERKELEY - RAUSSER COLLEGE OF NATURAL RESOURCES$100,000
SECOND HARVEST SILICON VALLEY$50,000
CANINE COMPANIONS$25,000
OSHMAN FAMILY JCC$25,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$25,000
SAN DIEGO ZOO WILDLIFE ALLIANCE$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$25,000
LUCILLE PACKARD CHILD HEALTH$25,000
SAN FRANCISCO OPERA$25,000
YOUNG MUSICIANS' FOUNDATION$20,000
LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION$15,000
JEWISH FILM INSTITUTE$10,000
CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES$10,000
DISCOVERY EYE CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CANINE COMPANIONS: $25k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $25k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $10k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $10k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $10k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 33 repeat orgs$392k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
9

Total granted

$1.9M
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
-4%

Still filing today

52%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $296k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsHealthFood & NutritionEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +55%
  • WF
    WESTSIDE FOOD BANK
    3× · 2020–2022 · $125k · revenue +127%
  • YM
    YOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • GO
    GRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -4%
  • GL
    GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -7%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
3
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
4
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
5
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
6
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
7
California Association for Research in Astronomy

To advance the frontiers of astronomy and share our discoveries with the world. the two 10-meter telescopes of keck observatory are the world's largest optical and infrared telescopes. they have revolutionized our understanding of the…

Science & Tech
8
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
9
The Contemporary Jewish Museum

The contemporary jewish museum (the cjm) makes the diversity of the jewish experience relevant for a twenty-first-century audience through innovative exhibitions and programs that educate, challenge, and inspire.

Arts & Culture
10
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
11
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
12
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Science Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Opera Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
18/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOS ANGELES OPERA: $150,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES OPERAPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $135,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODGLAZA: $115,000 · OtherGLAZAUC BERKELEY - RAUSSER COLLEGE OF NATURAL RESOURCES: $100,000 · OtherUC BERKELEY - RAUSSER COLLEGE OF NATURAL RESOUR…SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $65,000 · OtherMETROPOLITAN OPERA THE: $60,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES FOOD BANK: $50,000 · OtherBeit T'Shuvah: $45,000 · OtherCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $90,000 · OtherCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC+23 more: $424,500 · Other+23 moreAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $375,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $50,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS …HIAS INC: $30,000 · InternationalHIAS INCYOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION: $120,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG MUSICIA…CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $70,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA SC…CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $60,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER THEATR…SAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO…SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL CULT…LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+3 moreCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $250,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINA…Children's Hospital Los Angeles: $35,000 · HealthChildren's …AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $25,000 · HealthAMERICAN CA…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $250,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationAMERICAN F…+1 more: $5,000 · EducationWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $125,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $50,000 · Food & NutritionOUR BIG KITCHEN LOS ANGELES: $15,000 · Food & NutritionZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $85,000 · AnimalsGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF THE PALO ALTO JUNIOR MUSEUM & ZOO: $10,000 · Animals+1 more: $1,000 · Animals
Other$1,234,500International$455,000Arts & Culture$340,000Health$310,000Education$280,000Food & Nutrition$190,000Animals$121,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $375,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $125,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $85,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER: $35,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetOSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHIAS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR BIG KITCHEN LOS ANGELES: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PALO ALTO JUNIOR MUSEUM & ZOO: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Beit T'Shuvah ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds GRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ahmanson FoundationCA15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ahmanson Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · Schlum Charitable Trust Ua Mar 5 1990 · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Virginia Friedhofer Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Virginia Friedhofer Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Virginia Friedhofer Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Virginia Friedhofer Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Virginia Friedhofer’s filings →

More from the funding graph