Skip to content

· Private foundation

Umalinda Private Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$94k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$102kHuman Services$76kAnimals$55kInternational$52kFood & Nutrition$47kRecreation & Sports$42kArts & Culture$40kEducation$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$2,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAWS OF WAR$10,000
SOCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION$10,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$10,000
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$10,000
THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$6,000
THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST$5,507
PROJECT K9 HERO$5,000
ASPCA ADOPTION CENTER$5,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$5,000
GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER$5,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$5,000
CURESEARCH$2,500
MET MUSEUM$2,500
K9S FOR WARRIORS$2,500
AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $500 → 6%THE SEEING EYE: $1k → 4%THE SEEING EYE: $1k → 4%SOUTH ASIAN COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $10k → 13%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $1k → 7%SOUTH ASIAN COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
PA
NJ
CA
UT
NE
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$335k · 32 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
43

Total granted

$335k
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+9%

Still filing today

66%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    5× · 2020–2025 · $51k · revenue +106%
  • GL
    GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $34k · revenue +188%
  • CP
    CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR DISEASE DYNAMICS ECONOMICS & POLICY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -77%
  • TI
    The Independence Fund Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +13%
  • U
    UNNELTOTOWERS
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
The New York and Presbyterian Hospital

To be a leader in the provision of world class patient care, teaching, research, and service to local, state, national, and international communities. newyork-presbyterian hospital is one of the nation's most comprehensive, integrated…

Health
6
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
7
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
8
National September 11 Memorial and Museum At the World Trade Center

The national september 11 memorial & museum at the world trade center bears solemn witness to the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001, and february 26, 1993. located at a site made sacred through loss, the memorial & museum remembers…

Arts & Culture
9
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
10
Nyu Langone Hospitals

The board adopted mission statement is: nyu langone hospitals (the "hospital") will operate with new york university's medical schools a health system ("nyu langone health") devoted to excellence in patient care, education and research. in…

Health
11
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
12
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is God's Love We Deliver Inc; the most unlike its peers is New Yankee Stadium Community Benefits Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
34/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOCIAL SERVICES: $10,000 · OtherASPCA ADOPTION CENTER: $10,000 · OtherSOCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $8,000 · OtherSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $9,000 · OtherThe Independence Fund Inc: $20,000 · OtherThe Independence Fund IncThe Billy Mac Fund Inc: $9,300 · Other+53 more: $128,171 · Other+53 moreTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · HealthTHE VALLEY HOSPITA…CENTER FOR DISEASE DYNAMICS ECONOMICS & POLICY INC: $20,000 · HealthCENTER FOR DISEASE…CURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER: $19,500 · HealthCURESEARCH FOR CHI…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS…+5 more: $4,450 · Health+5 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $51,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S…K9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $21,000 · AnimalsK9S FOR WA…PAWS OF WAR INC: $10,000 · AnimalsPAWS OF WA…THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $6,517 · AnimalsTHE DAVID …PROJECT K9 HERO: $5,000 · AnimalsPROJECT K9…HABITAT FOR HORSES INC: $2,008 · AnimalsGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $33,500 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $3,500 · Food & NutritionCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $30,250 · Recreation & SportsSOUTH ASIAN COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING EYE INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human Services
Other$224,471Health$78,950Religion$51,000Animals$44,525Food & Nutrition$37,000Recreation & Sports$30,250Human Services$23,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $51,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $33,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $30,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR DISEASE DYNAMICS ECONOMICS & POLICY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH ASIAN COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetThe Independence Fund Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER: $19,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Billy Mac Fund Inc: $9,300 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROSE: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $6,517 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTHCARE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $5,550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMY TRIBUTE GIFT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST RESPONDERS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMiami Rescue Mission Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HORSES INC: $2,008 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVANCE THE CURE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetNOT ONE MORE VET INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEAD PROGRAM INC: $750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE RIDGEWOOD LIBRARY: $700 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORIC HUDSON VALLEY: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELP HOSPITALIZED VETERANS INC: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER RIDGEWOOD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YANKEE STADIUM COMMUNITY BENEFITS FUND INC: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR DISEASE DYNAMICS ECONOMICS & POLICY INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH ASIAN COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds The Independence Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER ↗
  • Who funds PAWS OF WAR INC ↗
  • Who funds The Billy Mac Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE ROSE ↗
  • Who funds THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds WEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTHCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds MY TRIBUTE GIFT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Bergen County Players Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT K9 HERO ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Umalinda Private Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Umalinda Private Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Center for Disease Dynamics Economics & Policy Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International: 14% of income from government
  • West Bergen Mental Healthcare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Umalinda Private Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Umalinda Private Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Umalinda Private’s filings →

More from the funding graph