Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Trisons Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.1M
Granted FY2023
16
Grants FY2023
8
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Youth Development$1.0MInternational$693kEducation$660kHuman Services$380kHealth$105kEnvironment$90kFood & Nutrition$90kCrime & Legal$75kOther$0
02FY2023 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $1,878,083 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,055,583 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $177,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k12 grants · $303k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.4M
$30,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$50M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
New Image Youth Center Inc.$1,000,000
The Clear Fund d/b/a GiveWell$374,881
Baylor University$150,000
Victim Service Center of Central Florida$50,000
Adventist Health International$45,702
Hawaii Community Foundation$42,500
Collective Heritage Institute$30,000
Sky Lakes Medical Center Foundation Inc.$30,000
Operation Smile Inc.$25,000
Smile Train Inc.$25,000
Firefighters United for Safety Ethics & Ecology$25,000
Dayspring Baptist Church$20,000
Agrarian Land Trust$20,000
Palm Coast SDA Church$15,000
SALT Outreach Inc.$15,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 4 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +194% since the first grant, against +50% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
15

Total granted

$1.4M
$590k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+194%
+50%

Still filing today

100%
87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’23
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalInternationalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CLEAR FUND
    2× · 2021–2023 · $647k · revenue +31%
  • BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2021–2023 · $605k · revenue +15%
  • SO
    Salt Outreach Inc
    2× · 2021–2023 · $115k · revenue +194%

Funded once

  • RR
    REZ REFUGE MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue 0% · 51% of their budget
  • SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -19%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue +112%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
2
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

5
Earthenable Inc

Earthenable works to solve the housing crisis in africa by revolutionizing the rural housing industry through innovative, affordable, and sustainable home-building solutions. its mission is to create healthier, safer, and climate-resilient…

International
6
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
7
The Hospice of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Suncoast hospice's mission is to be the center to improve life for those touched by advanced illness, death, dying, grief, bereavement and other end-of-life issues.

Human Services
8
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

9
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
10
Suncoast Partnership to End Homelessness

Lead agency in the community for providers of homeless/prevention services in manatee/sarasota. responsible to plan strategies with community partners, assist with grants, educate the public, advocate with local leadership, administer the…

Human Services
11
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
12
Habitat for Humanity of Orange County Inc

Habitat for humanity's mission is to give witness to the christian gospel by working with god's people to build decent habitats for those who are inadequately sheltered in orange county.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeless Emergency Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is One Heart for Women and Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDomestic Violence and Sexua…Christian Outreach Ministri…Community Hospital SystemsVolunteer Fire & RescueAddiction & Mental Health T…Civil Legal ServicesEnvironmental Advocacy and …Indigenous Community Develo…Food Pantries and AssistanceFaith-Based Homeless Servic…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%36%10–20yr17%43%20–35yr11%14%35–55yr13%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%65%10–20yr17%12%20–35yr11%22%35–55yr13%1%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,948

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
20/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW IMAGE YOUTH CENTER — $1,000,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEW IMAGE YOUTH CENTERTHE CLEAR FUND — $647,319 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEAR FUNDHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $42,500 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDA…BAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $605,000 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITYSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $40,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL …+1 more — $20,000 · EducationREZ REFUGE MINISTRIES INC — $250,000 · Human ServicesREZ REFUGE M…Salt Outreach Inc — $115,000 · Human ServicesSalt Outreac…+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $50,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST…BAPTIST WORLD ALLIANCE — $25,000 · OtherBAPTIST WORLD …SMILE TRAIN INC — $25,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN IN…DAYSPRING BAPTIST CHURCH — $20,000 · OtherPalm Coast SDA Church — $15,000 · OtherUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC — $15,000 · OtherHOMELESS EMERGENCY PROJECT INC — $30,000 · OtherHOMELESS EMERG…LOPEZ COMMUNITY LAND TRUST — $25,000 · OtherLOPEZ COMMUNIT…SKY LAKES MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherSKY LAKES MEDI…MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $15,000 · OtherLOMAKATSI RESTORATION PROJECT — $40,000 · OtherLOMAKATSI REST…FIREFIGHTERS UNITED FOR SAFETY ETHICS AND ECOLOGY — $35,000 · OtherFIREFIGHTERS U…COLLECTIVE HERITAGE INSTITUTE — $30,000 · OtherCOLLECTIVE HER…AGRARIAN LAND TRUST — $20,000 · OtherLIFT ORLANDO INC — $20,000 · OtherYestermorrow Inc — $15,000 · Other+2 more — $20,000 · OtherVictim Service Center of Central Florida Inc — $50,000 · Crime & LegalDESIGNING JUSTICE DESIGNING SPACES — $25,000 · Crime & LegalAdventist Health International — $45,702 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC — $25,000 · International
Youth Development$1,000,000Philanthropy$689,819Education$665,000Human Services$375,000Other$430,000Crime & Legal$75,000International$70,702

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW IMAGE YOUTH CENTER — $1,000,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND — $647,319 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $605,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREZ REFUGE MINISTRIES INC — $250,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetSalt Outreach Inc — $115,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetVictim Service Center of Central Florida Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAdventist Health International — $45,702 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $42,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOMAKATSI RESTORATION PROJECT — $40,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFIREFIGHTERS UNITED FOR SAFETY ETHICS AND ECOLOGY — $35,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetHOMELESS EMERGENCY PROJECT INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSKY LAKES MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOLLECTIVE HERITAGE INSTITUTE — $30,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOPEZ COMMUNITY LAND TRUST — $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetDESIGNING JUSTICE DESIGNING SPACES — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFT ORLANDO INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAGRARIAN LAND TRUST — $20,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE WATERSHED RESEARCH & TRAINING CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYestermorrow Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetOne Heart For Women and Children Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSweet Water Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC18× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Adventist Health SystemSunbelt Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Trisons Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Trisons Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $2.6M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph