Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Trio Foundation AKA RITA BLITT FUND AKA STONE BLOSSOM FUND

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$497k
Granted FY2024still arriving
41
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.

Human Services$1.6MInternational$215kArts & Culture$207kEducation$166kPhilanthropy$161kYouth Development$124kCivil Rights$101kHealth$74kCrime & Legal$69kOther$463k
02FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $341k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF MAJAL INC$100,000
ENCAMPMENT FOR CITIZENSHIP$34,000
TIDES FOUNDATION$30,000
PEACE DEVELOPMENT FUND INC$26,000
PARSONS DANCE FOUNDATION INC$25,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$25,000
CAMPS IN COMMON$20,000
OUR FAMILY COALITION$15,000
COCOKIDS INC$15,000
FIERCE ADVOCATES FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS EQUITABL$15,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$15,000
EAST BAY CHILDRENS LAW OFFICES INCORPORATED$15,000
CANTARE CON VIVO$15,000
BANANAS INCORPORATED$15,000
WE CARE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FIERCE ADVOCATES FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS EQUITABL: $15k → 9%SYNERGY SERVICES INC: $10k → 8%AFFECT REAL CHANGE INC: $5k → 24%COCOKIDS INC: $15k → 9%SYNERGY SERVICES INC: $10k → 8%AFFECT REAL CHANGE INC: $1k → 24%COCOKIDS INC: $15k → 9%SYNERGY SERVICES INC: $10k → 8%COUNSELING OPTIONS & PARENT EDUCATION SUPPORT CENT: $10k → 9%JEWISH COMMUNITY CAMPUS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INC: $1.0M → 5%SYNERGY SERVICES INC: $3k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CAMPUS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INC: $100k → 5%WE CARE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN: $15k → 9%WE CARE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 9%CHILD CARE LAW CENTER: $30k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 5%CHILD CARE LAW CENTER: $15k → 10%CHILD CARE LAW CENTER: $15k → 10%VILLAGE SHALOM INC: $250k → 5%VILLAGE SHALOM INC: $3k → 5%ASHBY VILLAGE INC: $3k → 10%CAMPS IN COMMON: $20k → 10%BANANAS INCORPORATED: $15k → 10%BANANAS INCORPORATED: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
MI
NY
MA
CA
CO
MO
WV
VA
AZ
KS
DC
LA
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 35 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

35 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
37

Total granted

$1.1M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+42%

Still filing today

97%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $211k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureInternationalEducationHealthCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VS
    VILLAGE SHALOM INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $253k · revenue +43%
  • UA
    UNIVERSITY ACADEMY
    2× · 2022–2024 · $101k · revenue +16%
  • EF
    ENCAMPMENT FOR CITIZENSHIP
    5× · 2020–2024 · $79k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CAMPUS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1.1M · revenue -28% · 28% of their budget
  • TH
    THE HAROLD GRINSPOON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -34%
  • FF
    Freedom for Immigrants
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -43%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Film Institute

The Jewish Film Institute champions bold films and filmmakers that expand and evolve the Jewish story for audiences everywhere. Through its exhibition and artist development programs, JFI celebrates the spirit of film, inquiry,…

Arts & Culture
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
4
Bay Area Organizing Committee

A broad based network of local institutions - congregations, synagogues, non-profits and civic associations - that serve as a foundation for public relationships, leadership development and action around issues that affect our communities.

Unclassified
5
Jews of Color Initiative

The Jews of Color Initiatives mission is to advance racial equity in the U.S. Jewish community by centering the leadership of Jews of Color and ensuring that our communities and institutions reflect the multiracial reality of the Jewish…

Civil Rights
6
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
7
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
8
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
9
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
10
Family Violence Law Center

FVLC helps diverse communities in Alameda County heal from domestic violence and sexual assault, advocating for justice and healthy relationships. We provide survivor-centered legal and crisis intervention services, offer prevention for…

Crime & Legal
11
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
12
Jewish Family Service

Jewish Family Service is a nonprofit social service organization that supports people of all faiths as they navigate through lifes's challenges - illness, aging , finanical uncertainty, mental health concerns, family problems, or personal…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Community Services East Bay and the most unlike its peers is New Thought Vermont Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Senior Support ServicesYouth Development ServicesChristian Youth CampsLgbtq+ Community SupportFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support ServicesYmca Youth DevelopmentWomen & Girls Leadership De…Pregnancy Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportDance Arts OrganizationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Addiction Recovery ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Local Food System Organizat…Local History MuseumsFood Banks and PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Immigrant Worker SupportCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%54%35–55yr16%6%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/86
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,479

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
84/85
Grantees still filing
57/85
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY CAMPUS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INC — $1,100,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CAMPUS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INCVILLAGE SHALOM INC — $252,500 · Human ServicesVILLAGE SHALOM INCChild Care Law Center — $60,000 · Human Services+11 more — $191,700 · Human Services+11 moreTHE HAROLD GRINSPOON FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherTHE HAROLD GRINSPOON FOUN…GATEWAY FOSTER AND ADOPTIVE CARE ASSOCIATION OF GR — $50,000 · OtherGATEWAY FOSTER AND ADOPTI…YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE EAST BAY — $45,000 · OtherYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSO…JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA — $26,000 · OtherFreedom for Immigrants — $50,000 · OtherFreedom for ImmigrantsAMERICANS FOR DEMOCRACY & HUMAN RIGHTS IN BAHRAIN — $45,345 · OtherAMERICANS FOR DEMOCRACY &…JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY — $36,250 · OtherEAST BAY CHILDRENS LAW OFFICES INC — $60,000 · OtherEAST BAY CHILDRENS LAW OF…NEW THOUGHT VERMONT INC — $35,400 · OtherNYAKA INC — $24,500 · Other+31 more — $234,600 · Other+31 moreFRIENDS OF MAJAL INC — $100,000 · InternationalPeace Development Fund — $66,500 · InternationalMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $10,000 · InternationalBAITULMAAL INC — $10,000 · International+6 more — $28,000 · InternationalPARSONS DANCE FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · Arts & CultureCANTARE CON VIVO — $30,000 · Arts & CultureHabitot Childrens Museum — $30,000 · Arts & CultureKANSAS CITY FRIENDS OF ALVIN AILEY — $25,000 · Arts & CultureCELEBRATE THE BEAT — $25,000 · Arts & CultureCLOSE ENCOUNTERS WITH MUSIC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureBay Area Music Project — $10,000 · Arts & CultureALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE INC — $10,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $6,500 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY ACADEMY — $101,000 · EducationTANDEM PARTNERS IN EARLY LEARNING — $30,000 · EducationBay Area Hispano Institute for Advancement Inc — $15,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $11,000 · Education+4 more — $8,500 · EducationJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $100,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION — $34,700 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $20,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $6,000 · PhilanthropyENCAMPMENT FOR CITIZENSHIP — $79,000 · Youth DevelopmentLOTUS BLOOM — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $15,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$1,604,200Other$707,095International$214,500Arts & Culture$206,500Education$165,500Philanthropy$160,700Youth Development$124,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CAMPUS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INC — $1,100,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetVILLAGE SHALOM INC — $252,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY ACADEMY — $101,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HAROLD GRINSPOON FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF MAJAL INC — $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $100,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetENCAMPMENT FOR CITIZENSHIP — $79,000 over 5y, 9.2% of budgetPeace Development Fund — $66,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetEAST BAY CHILDRENS LAW OFFICES INC — $60,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetChild Care Law Center — $60,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetFreedom for Immigrants — $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICANS FOR DEMOCRACY & HUMAN RIGHTS IN BAHRAIN — $45,345 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetPARSONS DANCE FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY — $36,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNEW THOUGHT VERMONT INC — $35,400 over 4y, 26% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $34,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSYNERGY SERVICES INC — $33,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCANTARE CON VIVO — $30,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetTANDEM PARTNERS IN EARLY LEARNING — $30,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetLOTUS BLOOM — $30,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHabitot Childrens Museum — $30,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetCocoKids Inc — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBANANAS INCORPORATED — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA — $26,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKANSAS CITY FRIENDS OF ALVIN AILEY — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCELEBRATE THE BEAT — $25,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetCLOSE ENCOUNTERS WITH MUSIC — $25,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetNYAKA INC — $24,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCamps in Common — $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWe Care Services For Children — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOUR FAMILY COALITION — $15,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFamily Paths Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPACT AN ADOPTION ALLIANCE — $15,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBay Area Hispano Institute for Advancement Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIERCE Advocates Families & Individuals Equitably Rooted in Collective Empowerme — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF OAKLAND — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN HEALTH SERVICES — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNETROOTS FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAITULMAAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOakland Youth Chorus — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget18 Reasons — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bernard E & Alba Witk…East Bay Community Fo…The San Francisco Fou…The Barrios TrustThe Joseph and Vera L…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Greater Kansas City C…G Kenneth and Ann Bau…The Morris Stulsaft F…McNabb FoundationJewish Community Foun…Sunlight Giving
Bernard E & Alba Witkin Charitable FoundationCA36.3× affinity15 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bernard E & Alba Witkin Charitable Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Barrios Trust · The Joseph and Vera Long Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · G Kenneth and Ann Baum Philanthropic Fund · The Morris Stulsaft Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Sunlight Giving

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Trio Foundation AKA RITA BLITT FUND AKA STONE BLOSSOM FUND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Jacob's Pillow Dance Festival Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Trio Foundation AKA RITA BLITT FUND AKA STONE BLOSSOM FUND?

Find your warmest path to Trio Foundation AKA RITA BLITT FUND AKA STONE BLOSSOM FUND through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines