Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Massachusetts · Nonprofit

MOVEMENT VOTER FUND

MOVEMENT VOTER FUND (Massachusetts) receives grants from 32 organizations whose IRS filings report $13,617,307 to it, the largest being Tides Foundation ($8,710,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 91% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$11M
Revenue FY2024
32
Funders on record
$14M
Grants received
$7.9M
Net assets
10/32 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year

Against its field

MOVEMENT VOTER FUND runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 658 community improvement nonprofits its size.

Operating margin52% · top quartile
Months of reserve18.2mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)323% · outside the comparable range

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 658 community improvement nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($150k) Expenses 0 ($0) Net assets 100 ($150k)2022 Revenue 115 ($172k) Expenses 100 ($14k) Net assets 206 ($308k)2023 Revenue 4039 ($6.1M) Expenses 31815 ($4.3M) Net assets 1376 ($2.1M)2024 Revenue 7563 ($11M) Expenses 40416 ($5.5M) Net assets 5293 ($7.9M)
2021202220232024
Revenue (7563)Expenses (40416)Net assets (5293)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of MOVEMENT VOTER FUND’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (61% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 696 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.

$150k
21
$158k
22
$1.8M
23
$5.9M
24
18
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2021 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 9 funders, grant income rose $180k → $5.1M.

12 of 32 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)91% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of MOVEMENT VOTER FUND’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 32 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MOVEMENT VOTER FUND leans on a few funders — its largest provides 64% of grant income and the top three 84%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

91% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MOVEMENT VOTER FUND.

64%
largest funder
84%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 83% · 2022 48% · 2023 89%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

91% of MOVEMENT VOTER FUND's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $1.2M that is directly attributable, 86% of it comes from funders outside Massachusetts, across 10 states.

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
CO
DE
SC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

21
22
23
Massachusetts out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $12M arriving through sponsors registered in 10 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 32 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like MOVEMENT VOTER FUND

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Massachusetts

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

57% of spending goes to programs.

Program 57%Management 20%Fundraising 23%

Governance

3
board members
67%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

VA

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • All Hands on Deck Network Inc · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MOVEMENT VOTER FUND: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MOVEMENT VOTER FUND?
MOVEMENT VOTER FUND (Massachusetts) receives grants from 32 organizations whose IRS filings report $13,617,307 to it, the largest being Tides Foundation ($8,710,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 91% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does MOVEMENT VOTER FUND have?
IRS filings report 32 organizations giving $13,617,307 in grants to MOVEMENT VOTER FUND, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MOVEMENT VOTER FUND?
Tides Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $8,710,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MOVEMENT VOTER FUND find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Massachusetts. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2021–2024), and the filings of 32funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing